Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T00:25:55.349Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Framing Serbia: the effects of news framing on public support for EU enlargement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2010

Sophie Lecheler  and
Claes H. De Vreese
Sophie Lecheler*
Affiliation:
Amsterdam School of Communications Research, University of Amsterdam, Kloveniersburgwal 48, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Claes H. De Vreese
Affiliation:
Amsterdam School of Communications Research, University of Amsterdam, Kloveniersburgwal 48, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
*
* E-mail: S.K.Lecheler@uva.nl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

One of the most important activities of the European Union (EU) has been widening the Union, that is, enlargement. Tapping to what extent and why EU citizens support future enlargement rounds has become a popular endeavour among researchers and EU officials. During recent years, a number of studies have indicated that public support for EU integration is likely to also depend on how the national news media portray the EU. Based on an experimental survey design, we test the effects of two news frames on support for future Serbian EU candidacy. We find that exposure to news frames has considerable impact on general understanding of Serbian EU candidacy, issue interpretation, and policy support. This effect is moderated by political knowledge. Knowledgeable participants were able to express their thoughts on Serbian EU candidacy more elaborately, whereas low-knowledge individuals were overall more susceptible to framing effects. We discuss the implications of our findings for current debates such as Euroskepticism and decreasing public support for EU integration.

Keywords

mediaEU public opinionEU enlargementSerbiaframing effects
Type
Research Article
Information
European Political Science Review , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , March 2010 , pp. 73 - 93
Copyright
Copyright © European Consortium for Political Research 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, C.J. Reichert, M.S. (1996), ‘Economic benefits and support for membership in the European Union: a cross-national analysis’, Journal of Public Policy 15(3): 231–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berinsky, A.J. Kinder, D.R. (2006), ‘Making sense of issues through media frames: understanding the Kosovo Crisis’, Journal of Politics 68(3): 640–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullock, J.G. (2006), ‘Party cues and policy information: real and perceived effects’. Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 31–September 3, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Cappella, J.N. Jamieson, K.H. (1997), Spiral of Cynicism: The Press and the Public Good, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chong, D. Druckman, J.N. (2007a), ‘Framing public opinion in competitive democracies’, American Political Science Review 101(4): 637–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chong, D. Druckman, J.N. (2007b), ‘Framing theory’, Annual Review of Political Science 10: 103–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delli Carpini, M.X. Keeter, S. (1993), ‘Measuring political knowledge: putting first things first’, American Journal of Political Science 37(4): 1179–1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vreese, C.H. (2002), Framing Europe: Television News and European Integration, Amsterdam: Aksant Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
de Vreese, C.H. (2007), ‘A spiral of Euroskepticism: the media’s fault?’, Acta Politica 42: 271–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Vreese, C.H. (2004), ‘The effects of frames in political television news on audience perceptions of routine political news’, Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 81(1): 36–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vreese, C.H. Boomgaarden, H.G. (2005), ‘Projecting EU referendums: fear of immigration and support for european integration’, European Union Politics 6(1): 59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Vreese, C.H. Boomgaarden, H.G. (2006), ‘Media effects on public opinion about the enlargement of the European Union’, Journal of Common Market Studies 44(2): 419–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vreese, C.H., Boomgaarden, H.G., Semetko, H.A. (2006), ‘Effects of issue news framing on public support for Turkish membership in the EU’. Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association, June 19–23, Dresden, Germany.Google Scholar
de Vreese, C.H., Peter, J. Semetko, H.A. (2001), ‘Framing politics at the launch of the Euro: a cross-national comparative study of frames in the news’, Political Communication 18(2): 107–122.Google Scholar
Doyle, O. Fidrmuc, J. (2006), ‘Who favors enlargement? Determinants of support for EU membership in the candidate countries’ referenda’, European Journal of Political Economy 22(2): 520–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, J.N. (2001), ‘On the limits of framing effects: who can frame?’, Journal of Politics 63(4): 1041–1066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, J.N. McDermott, R. (2008), ‘Emotion and the framing of risky choice’, Political Behaviour 30(3): 297–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, J.N. Nelson, K.R. (2003), ‘Framing and deliberation: how citizens’ conversations limit elite influence’, American Journal of Political Science 47(4): 729–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Entman, R.M. (2004), Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and US Foreign Policy, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Entman, R.M. (1993), ‘Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm’, Journal of Communication 43(4): 51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Commission (2005a), Eurobarometer 63, Brussels: DG Press and Communication, European Commission.Google Scholar
European Commission (2005b), Eurobarometer 64, Brussels: DG Press and Communication, European Commission.Google Scholar
European Commission (2006), Eurobarometer 66, Brussels: DG Press and Communication, European Commission.Google Scholar
Gabel, M. (1998), ‘Public support for European integration: an empirical test of five theories’, Journal of Politics 60(2): 333–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabel, M. Palmer, H.D. (1995), ‘Understanding variation in public support for European integration’, European Journal of Political Research 27(1): 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaines, B.J., Kuklinski, J.H. Quirk, P.J. (2007), ‘The logic of the survey experiment reexamined’, Political Analysis 15(1): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerhards, J. (1993), ‘Westeuropäische Integration und die Schwierigkeiten der Entstehung einer Europäischen Öffentlichkeit’, Zeitschrift für Soziologie 22(2): 96–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, A.F. Krippendorff, K. (2007), ‘Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data’, Communication Methods and Measures 1(1): 77–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hix, S. (2002), Linking National Politics to Europe, London: Foreign Policy Centre.Google Scholar
Hobolt, S.B. (2007), ‘Taking cues on Europe? Voter competence and party endorsements in referendums on European integration’, European Journal of Political Research 46(2): 151–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooghe, L. (2003), ‘Elite versus public opinion on European integration’, European Union Politics 4(3): 281–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooghe, L. Marks, G. (2004), ‘Does identity or economic rationality drive public opinion on European integration?’, PS: Political Science and Politics 37(3): 415–420.Google Scholar
Hooghe, L. Marks, G. (2005), ‘Calculation, community and cues: public opinion on European integration’, European Union Politics 6(4): 419–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooghe, L. Marks, G. (2007), ‘Crossvalidating data on party positioning on European integration’, Electoral Studies 26(1): 23–38.Google Scholar
Iyengar, S. (1991), Is Anyone Responsible? How Television Frames Political Issues, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, E. van der Bijl, N. (2004), ‘Public opinion and enlargement: a gravity approach’, European Union Politics 5(3): 331–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaltenthaler, K.C. Anderson, C.J. (2001), ‘Europeans and their money: explaining public support for the common European currency’, European Journal of Political Research 40(2): 139–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karp, J.A. Bowler, S. (2006), ‘Broadening and deepening or broadening versus deepening: the question of enlargement and Europe’s hesitant Europeans’, European Journal of Political Research 45(3): 369–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karp, J., Banducci, S.A. Bowler, S. (2003), ‘To know it is to love it? Satisfaction with democracy in the European Union’, Comparative Political Studies 36(3): 271–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinder, D.R. Sanders, L.M. (1990), ‘Mimicking political debate with survey questions: the case of White opinion on affirmative action for Blacks’, Social Cognition 8(1): 73–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiousis, S. McCombs, M. (2004), ‘Agenda-setting effects and attitude strength. Political figures during the 1996 Presidential Election’, Communication Research 31(1): 36–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krosnick, J.A. Brannon, L.A. (1993), ‘The impact of the Gulf War on the ingredients of presidential evaluations: multidimensional effects of political involvement’, American Political Science Review 87(4): 963–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krosnick, J.A., Boninger, D.S., Chuang, Y.C., Berent, M.K. Carnot, C.G. (1993), ‘Attitude strength: one construct or many related constructs?’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65(6): 1132–1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lecheler, S., de Vreese, C.H. Slothuus, R. (2009), ‘Issue importance as a moderator of framing effects’, Communication Research 36(3): 400–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J. Campanella Bracken, C. (2002), ‘Content analysis in mass communication. Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability’, Human Communication Research 28(4): 587–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maier, J. Rittberger, B. (2008), ‘Shifting Europe’s boundaries: mass media, public opinion and the enlargement of the EU’, European Union Politics 9(2): 243–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthes, J. (2007), ‘Beyond accessibility? Toward an on-line and memory-based model of framing effects’, Communications 32(1): 51–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCombs, M.E. Shaw, D.L. (1972), ‘The agenda-setting function of mass media’, Public Opinion Quarterly 36(2): 176–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, R. (2002), ‘Experimental methodology in Political Science’, Political Analysis 10(4): 325–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaren, L. (2007), ‘Explaining opposition to Turkish membership of the EU’, European Union Politics 8(2): 251–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLeod, D.N. Detenber, B.H. (1999), ‘Framing effects of television news coverage of social protest’, Journal of Communication 49(3): 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, C. (1999), ‘Political legitimacy in the invisibility of politics: exploring the European Union’s communication deficit’, Journal of Common Market Studies 37(4): 617–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, T.E. Oxley, Z.M. (1999), ‘Issue framing effects on belief importance and opinion’, The Journal of Politics 61(4): 1040–1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, T.E., Oxley, Z.M. Clawson, R.A. (1997), ‘Toward a psychology of framing effects’, Political Behavior 19(3): 221–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, P. (2000), A Virtuous Circle. Political Communications in Postindustrial Societies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peter, J de Vreese, C.H. (2004), ‘In search of Europe. A cross-national comparative study of the European Union in national television news’, The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 9(4): 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petty, R.E. Cacioppo, J.T. (1981), Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches, Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown.Google Scholar
Price, V., Tewkbury, D. Powers, E. (1997), ‘Switching trains of thought: the impact of news frames on readers’ cognitive responses’, Communication Research 24(5): 481–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Princen, S. Rhinard, M. (2006), ‘Crashing and creeping: agenda-setting dynamic in the European Union’, Journal of European Public Policy 13(7): 1119–1132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheufele, D.A. (2000), ‘Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: another look at cognitive effects of political communication’, Mass Communication and Society 3(2): 297–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuck, A.R.T. de Vreese, C.H. (2006), ‘Between risk and opportunity: news framing and its effects on public support for EU enlargement’, European Journal of Communication 21(1): 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuck, A.R.T. de Vreese, C.H. (2009), ‘When good News is bad news: explicating the moderated mediation dynamics behind the reversed mobilization effect’. Paper presented to the Etmaal voor de Communicatiewetenschap, 12–13 February 2009, Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Semetko, H.A. Valkenburg, P.M. (2000), ‘Framing European politics: a content analysis of press and television news’, Journal of Communication 50(2): 93–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah, D., Kwak, N., Schmierbach, M. Zubric, J. (2004), ‘The interplay of news frames on cognitive complexity’, Human Communication Research 30(1): 102–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, F. Edwards, H.H. (2005), ‘Economic individualism, humanitarianism, and welfare reform: a value-based account of framing effects’, Journal of Communication 55(4): 795–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slothuus, R. (2008), ‘More than weighting cognitive importance: a dual-process model of issue framing effects’, Political Psychology 29(1): 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. (2005), Reinvigorating the European Elections. The Implications of Electing the European Commission, London: RIIA.Google Scholar
Sniderman, P.M. Theriault, S.M. (2004), ‘The structure of political argument and the logic of issue framing’, in W.E. Saris and P.M. Sniderman (eds), Studies in Public Opinion, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 133–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tao, C.C. Bucy, E. (2007), ‘Conceptualizing media stimuli in experimental research: psychological versus attribute-based definitions’, Human Communication Research 33(4): 397–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valkenburg, P.M., Semetko, H.A. de Vreese, C.H. (1999), ‘The effects of news frames on readers’ thoughts and recall’, Communication Research 26(5): 550–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walgrave, S., Soroka, S. Nuytemans, M. (2008), ‘The mass media’s political agenda-setting power’, Comparative Political Studies 41(6): 814–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaller, J.R. (1992), The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaller, J. Feldman, S. (1992), ‘A simple theory of the survey response. Answering questions versus revealing preferences’, American Journal of Political Science 36(3): 579–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar