Anderson, C.J., Blais, A., Bowler, S., Donovan, T.Listhaug, O. (2005), Losers’ Consent: Elections and Democratic Legitimacy, New York: Oxford University Press.
Bohman, J. (2009), ‘Epistemic value and deliberative democracy’, The Good Society 18: 28–34.
Bovens, L.Rabinowicz, W. (2004), ‘Voting procedures for complex collective decisions – an epistemic perspective’, Ratio Juris 17: 241–258.
Bovens, L.Rabinowicz, W. (2006), ‘Democratic answers to complex questions – an epistemic perspective’, Synthese 150: 131–153.
Bowler, S., Donovan, S.Karp, J. (2007), ‘Enraged or engaged? Preferences for direct citizen participation in affluent democracies’, Political Research Quarterly 60: 351–377.
Brockner, J., Siegel, P.A., Martin, D., Reed, D., Heuer, L., Wiesenfeld, B., Grover, S.Bjorgvinsson, S. (1998), ‘The moderating effect of self-esteem in reaction to voice: converging evidence from five studies’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75: 394–407.
Chambers, S. (2003), ‘Deliberative democratic theory’, Annual Review of Political Science 6: 307–326.
Cohen, J. (1997), ‘Deliberation and democratic legitimacy’, in J. Bohman and W. Rehg (eds), Deliberative Democracy, Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 67–91.
Cooke, M. (2000), ‘Five arguments for deliberative democracy’, Political Studies 48: 947–969.
Dahl, R.A. (1989), Democracy and Its Critics, New Haven: Yale University Press.
Delli Carpini, M.X., Cook, F.L.Jacobs, L.R. (2004), ‘Public deliberation, discursive participation and citizen engagement: a review of empirical literature’, Annual Review of Political Science 7: 315–344.
Dryzek, J.S. (2000), Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, and Contestations, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dryzek, J.S.List, C. (2003), ‘Social choice theory and deliberative democracy: a reconciliation’, British Journal of Political Science 33: 1–28.
Duflo, E., Glennerster, R.Kremer, M. (2008), ‘Using randomization in development economics research: a toolkit’, in T.P. Schultz and J. Strauss (eds), Handbook of Development Economics, vol. 4. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 3896–3962.
Esaiasson, P. (2010), ‘Will citizens take no for an answer? What government officials can do to enhance decision acceptance’, European Political Science Review 2: 351–371.
Esaiasson, P., Gilljam, M., Persson, M. (2012), ‘Which decision-making arrangements generate the strongest legitimacy beliefs? Evidence from a randomized field experiment’, European Journal of Political Research. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.02052.x
Estlund, D. (2008), Democratic Authority, Princeton: University Press.
Fearon, J.D. (1998), ‘Deliberation as discussion’, in J. Elster (ed.), Deliberative Democracy, Cambridge: University Press, pp. 44–68.
Folger, R., Rosenfield, D., Grove, J.Corkran, L. (1979), ‘Effects of “voice” and peer opinions on responses to inequity’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37: 2253–2261.
Fishkin, J.S.Luskin, C. (2005), ‘Experiment with a democratic ideal: deliberative polling and public opinion’, Acta Politica 40: 284–298.
Gerber, A., Huber, G.Washington, E. (2010), ‘Party affiliation, partisanship, and political beliefs: a field experiment’, American Political Science Review 104: 720–744.
Gilljam, M., Esaiasson, P.Lindholm, T. (2009), ‘The voice of the pupils: an experimental comparison of decisions made by elected pupil councils, pupils in referenda, and teaching staff’, Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 22: 73–88.
Goodin, R.E. (2008), Innovating Democracy: Democratic Theory and Practice After the Deliberative Turn, Oxford: University Press.
Grimes, M. (2008), ‘Consent, political trust and compliance: rejoinder to Kaina's remarks on “Organizing Consent” ’, European Journal of Political Research 47: 522–535.
Grönlund, K., Setälä, M.Herne, K. (2010), ‘Deliberation and civic virtue – lessons from a citizen deliberation experiment’, European Political Science Review 2: 95–117.
Helwig, C.C., Arnold, M.L., Tan, D.Boyd, D. (2007), ‘Mainland Chinese and Canadian adolescents’ judgments and reasoning about the fairness of democratic and other forms of government’, Cognitive Development 22: 96–109.
Karpowitz, C.F.Mendelberg, T. (2011), ‘An experimental approach to citizen deliberation’, in J.N. Druckman, D.P. Green, J.H. Kuklinski and A. Lupia (eds), Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 258–272.
Knight, J.Johnson, J. (1994), ‘Aggregation and deliberation: on the possibility of democratic legitimacy’, Political Theory 22.
Lind, E.A.Tyler, T.R. (1988), The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice, New York: Plenum.
Lind, E.A., Kanfer, R.Earley, P.C. (1990), ‘Voice, control, and procedural justice: instrumental and non-instrumental concerns in fairness judgments’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59: 952–959.
List, C.Goodin, R.E. (2001), ‘Epistemic democracy: generalizing the Condorcet jury theorem’, Journal of Political Philosophy 9(3): 277–306.
Luskin, R.C., Fishkin, J.S.Jowell, R. (2002), ‘Considered opinions: deliberative polling Britain’, British Journal of Political Science 32: 455–487.
Manin, B. (1987), ‘On legitimacy and political deliberation’, Political Theory 15: 338–368.
Mansbridge, J., Bohman, J., Chambers, S., Estlund, D., Føllesdal, A., Fung, A., Lafont, C., Manin, B.Marti, J.I. (2010), ‘The place of self-interest and the role of power in deliberative democracy’, The Journal of Political Philosophy 18: 64–100.
Morrell, M.E. (1999), ‘Citizen's evaluations of participatory democratic procedures: normative theory meets empirical science’, Political Research Quarterly 52: 293–322.
Morrell, M.E. (2005), ‘Deliberation, democratic decision-making and internal political efficacy’, Political Behavior 27: 49–69.
Mutz, D.C. (2006), Hearing the Other Side, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Mutz, D.C. (2008), ‘Is deliberative democracy a falsifiable theory?’, Annual Review of Political Science 11: 521–538.
Palfrey, T.R. (2009), ‘Laboratory experiment in political economy’, Annual Review of Political Science 12: 379–388.
Pateman, C. (1970), Participation and Democratic Theory, London: Cambridge University Press.
Przeworski, A. (1998), ‘Deliberation and ideological domination’, in Elster J. (ed.), Deliberative Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 140–160.
Raudenbush, S.W. (1997), ‘Statistical analysis and optimal design for cluster randomized trials’, Psychological Methods 2: 173–185.
Rosenberg, S.W. (2007), ‘Introduction’, in Rosenberg S.W. (ed.), Deliberation, Participation and Democracy: Can the People Govern?. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–22.
Sanders, L.M. (1997), ‘Against deliberation’, Political Theory 25: 347–376.
Simon, A.F.Sulkin, T. (2002), ‘Discussion's impact on political allocations: an experimental approach’, Political Analysis 10: 403–412.
Shapiro, I. (1999), ‘Enough of deliberation: politics is about interests and power’, in Macedo S. (ed.), Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Scharpf, F.W. (2009), ‘Legitimacy in the multilevel European polity’, European Political Science Review 1: 173–204.
Sulkin, T.Simon, A.F. (2001), ‘Habermas in the lab: a study of deliberation in an experimental setting’, Political Psychology 22: 809–826.
Setälä, M., Grönlund, K.Herne, K. (2010), ‘Citizen deliberation on nuclear power: a comparison of two decision-making methods’, Political Studies 58: 688–714.
Skitka, L.J., Winquist, J.Hutchinson, S. (2003), ‘Are outcome fairness and outcome favorability distinguishable psychological constructs? A meta-analytic review’, Social Justice Research 16: 309–341.
Teorell, J. (2008), ‘Samtalsdemokrati med förhinder – en kritik av Fishkins medborgarpaneler’, in J. Hermansson, C. Karlsson and H. Montgomery (eds), Samtalets mekanismer, Liber: Malmö, pp. 277–296.
Thompson, D.F. (2008), ‘Deliberative democratic theory and empirical political science’, The Annual Review of Political Science 11: 497–520.
Tyler, T.R. (1990), Why People Obey the Law: Procedural Justice, Legitimacy and Compliance, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Tyler, T.R. (2006), ‘Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation’, Annual Review of Psychology 57: 375–400.
van den Bos, K. (1999), What are we talking about when we talk about no-voice procedures? On the psychology of the fair outcome effect, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 35: 560–577.
van den Bos, K., Lind, E.A., Vermunt, R.Wilke, H.A.M. (1997), ‘How do I judge my outcome when I do not know the outcome of others? The psychology of the fair process effect’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72: 1034–1046.
Warren, M. (1992), ‘Democratic theory and self-transformation’, American Political Science Review 86: 8–23.
Young, I.M. (2000), Inclusion and Democracy, New York: Oxford University Press.