Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T12:04:46.221Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

International organizations and organizational fields: explaining policy change in the IMF

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2013

Antje Vetterlein  and
Manuela Moschella
Antje Vetterlein*
Affiliation:
Department of Business and Politics, Copenhagen Business School, Steen Blichers Vej 22 Frederiksberg 2000, Denmark
Manuela Moschella
Affiliation:
Department of Culture, Politics and Society, Turin, Italy
*
*E-mails: av.dbp@cbs.dk, manuela.moschella@unito.it
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to account for varieties of organizational change. In particular, we contend that in order to explain change in international organizations (IOs) we cannot simply dichotomize between change and the lack thereof. Rather, change is best conceptualized as made up of two dimensions: speed and scope. The combination of the two dimensions leads to a taxonomy with four distinct types of policy change. The paper evaluates the emergence of different types of change by focusing on the relationship between IOs and their fields. Specifically, the position of the organization in the field helps to account for the speed of change (slow vs. rapid), whereas the openness of the organization to the inputs coming from the field helps to explain the scope of change (incremental vs. radical). We illustrate our argument by comparing the changes in the International Monetary Fund's policies in the areas of financial sector surveillance and poverty reduction.

Keywords

international organizationspolicy changeinstitutionalismorganizational fieldIMF
Type
Research Article
Information
European Political Science Review , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , February 2014 , pp. 143 - 165
Copyright
Copyright © European Consortium for Political Research 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, K. Snidal, D. (2010), ‘International regulation without international government: improving IO performance through orchestration’, Review of International Organizations 5(3): 315–344.Google Scholar
Barnett, M.N. Finnemore, M. (1999), ‘The politics, power, and pathologies of international organizations’, International Organization 53(4): 699–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, M.N. Finnemore, M. (2004), Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics, Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Barnett, M.N. Coleman, L. (2005), ‘Designing police: interpol and the study of change in international organizations’, International Studies Quarterly 49(4): 593–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, F.R. Jones, B.D. (1991), ‘Agenda dynamics and policy subsystems’, Journal of Politics 53(4): 1044–1075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bebbington, A.J., Woolcock, M., Guggenheim, S. Olson, E.A. (2006), The Search for Empowerment: Social Capital as Idea and Practice at the World Bank, Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
Botchwey, K., Collier, P., Gunning, J.W. Hamada, K. (1998), Report of the Group of Independent Persons Appointed to Conduct an Evaluation of Certain Aspects of the Enhanced Structural Adjustment Facility, Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
Boughton, J. (2001), Silent Revolution: The International Monetary Fund, 1979–1989, Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1993), ‘Some properties of fields’, in R. Nice (ed.), Sociology in Question, London: Sage, pp. 72–77.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. Wacquant, L. (1992), An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Broome, A. (2010), The Currency of Power: The IMF and Monetary Reform in Central Asia, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Capano, G. Howlett, M. (2009), ‘Introduction: the multidimensional world of policy dynamics’, in G. Capano, M. and Howlett (eds), European and North American Policy Change: Drivers and dynamics, London: Routledge, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
Chwieroth, J.M. (2010), Capital Ideas: The IMF and the Rise of Financial Liberalization, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Clegg, L. (2010), ‘In the loop: multilevel feedback and the politics of change at the IMF and World Bank’, Journal of International Relations and Development 13(1): 59–84.Google Scholar
Cortell, A.P. Peterson, S. (2006), ‘Dutiful agents, rogue actors, or both? Staffing, voting, rules, and slack in WHO e WTO’, in D.G. Hawkins, D.A. Lake, D.L. Nielson and M.J. Tierney (eds), Delegation and Agency in International Organizations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 255–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dannreuther, R. (2010), ‘Understanding the Middle East process: a historical institutionalist approach’, European Journal of International Relations 17(2): 187–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Development Committee. (1990), Development Issues, Presentations to the 39th Meeting of the Development Committee. Development Committee Pamphlet No. 26. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P. Powell, W.W. (1983), ‘The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields’, American Sociological Review 48: 147–160.Google Scholar
Dingwerth, K. Pattberg, P. (2009), ‘World politics and organizational fields: the case of transnational sustainability governance’, European Journal of International Relations 15(4): 707–744.Google Scholar
Elsig, M. (2011), ‘Principal–agent theory and the World Trade Organization: complex agency and ‘missing delegation’, European Journal of International Relations 17(3): 495–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fioretos, O. (2011), ‘Historical institutionalism in international relations’, International Organization 65(2): 367–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fligstein, N. (2008), ‘Fields, power and social skill: a critical analysis of the new institutionalisms’, International Public Management Review 9: 227–253.Google Scholar
G7 (1995), ‘Ministers of the Group of Seven’. Halifax Summit Communiqué, 21th Meeting, 16 June 1995.Google Scholar
Gerster, R. (1982), ‘The IMF and basic needs conditionality’, Journal of World Trade Law 16: 497–517.Google Scholar
Gola, C., Spadafora, F. (2009). ‘Financial Sector Surveillance and the IMF’. IMF Working Paper No. 247, Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
Gorges, M.J. (2001), ‘New Institutionalist explanations for institutional change: a note of caution’, Politics and Society 21(2): 137–145.Google Scholar
Guitiàn, M. (1992), The Unique Nature of the Responsibilities of the International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
Gupta, S. Nashashibi, K. (1990), ‘Poverty concerns in fund-supported programs’, Finance & Development 27: 12–14.Google Scholar
Gupta, S., Dicks-Mireaux, L., Khemani, R., McDonald, C., Verhoeven, M. (2000), Social Issues in IMF-Supported Programs. Occasional Paper No. 191, Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
Gutner, T. Thompson, A. (2010), ‘The politics of IO performance: a framework’, Review of International Organizations 5(3): 227–248.Google Scholar
Hacker, J.S. (2004), ‘Privatizing risk without privatizing the welfare state: the hidden politics of social policy retrenchment in the United States’, American Political Science Review 98(2): 243–260.Google Scholar
Hall, P.A. (1993), ‘Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain’, Comparative Politics 25(3): 275–296.Google Scholar
Hawkins, D.G., Lake, D.A., Nielson, D.L. Tierney, M.J. (eds) (2006), Delegation and Agency in International Organizations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller, P.S., Bovenberg, A.L., Catsambas, Th., Chu, K-y., Shome, P. (1988), The Implications of Fund-Supported Adjustment Programs for Poverty: Experiences in Selected Countries. Occasional Paper No. 58, Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
Hopf, T. (2010), ‘The logic of habit in international relations’, European Journal of International Relations 16(4): 539–561.Google Scholar
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (1976), Intragenerational Equity Under Social Security. Internal Document DM/76/23, Washington, DC: IMF, Fiscal Affairs Department.Google Scholar
IMF (1979a), Inflation, Taxes and Welfare in LDCs. Internal Document DM/79/42, Washington, DC: IMF, Research Department.Google Scholar
IMF (1979b), The Influence of Social Security on Household Savings: A Cross-Country Investigation. Internal Document DM/79/64, Washington, DC: IMF, Fiscal Affairs Department.Google Scholar
IMF (1986), Fund-Supported Programs, Fiscal Policy, and Income Distribution. IMF Occasional Paper No. 46, Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
IMF (1995), Reviews of Surveillance – Staff Operational Guidance Note. IMF Archives, Staff Memorandum SM/95/22, Sup. 3, Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
IMF (1997a), Biennial Review of the Implementation of the Fund's Surveillance over Members’ Exchange Rate Policies, and of the 1977 Surveillance Decision. IMF Archives, SM/97/53, Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
IMF (1997b), Toward a Framework for Sound Banking. IMF Archives, EBS/97/38, Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
IMF (1999), External Evaluation of IMF Surveillance: Report by a Group of Independent Expert. IMF Archives, EBAP/99/86, Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
IMF (2000), Biennial Review of the Implementation of the Fund's Surveillance and of the 1977 Surveillance Decision. IMF Archives, SM/00/40, Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
IMF (2003), Financial Sector Assessment Program – Review, Lessons, and Issues Going Forward. IMF Archives, SM/03/77, Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
IMF/FAD (1998) The IMF and the Poor, Pamphlet Series No. 52, Washington, DC: IMF, Fiscal Affairs Department.Google Scholar
Independent Evaluation Office (IEO) (2005), The IMF's Approach to Capital Account Liberalization: Evaluation Report, Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
IEO (2011), IMF Performance in the Run-Up to the Financial and Economic Crisis: IMF Surveillance in 2004–07, Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
Koremenos, B., Lipson, C. Snidal, D. (2001), ‘The rational design of international institutions’, International Organization 55(4): 761–800.Google Scholar
Krasner, S.D. (1983), International Regimes, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Leander, A. (2010), ‘Habitus and field’, in The International Studies Encyclopedia, Vol. V, John Wiley & Sons, pp. 3255–3270.Google Scholar
Lipson, M. (2007), ‘Peacekeeping: organized hypocrisy?’, European Journal of International Relations 13(1): 5–34.Google Scholar
Mahoney, J. Thelen, K. (2010), ‘A theory of gradual institutional change’, in J. Mahoney and K. Thelen (eds), Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–37.Google Scholar
Momani, B. (2005), ‘Limits on streamlining fund conditionality: the international monetary fund's organizational culture’, Journal of International Relations and Development 8(2): 142–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moschella, M. (2009), ‘When Ideas Fail to Influence Policy Outcomes: Orderly Liberalization and the International Monetary Fund.’, Review of International Political Economy, 16: 5, 854–882.Google Scholar
Moschella, M. (2010), Governing Risk: The IMF and Global Financial Crises, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Moschella, M. (2011), ‘Lagged learning and the response to equilibrium shock: the global financial crisis and IMF surveillance’, Journal of Public Policy 31(2): 1–21.Google Scholar
Neumann, I.B. (2007), ‘A speech that the entire ministry may stand for’, International Political Sociology 1(2): 183–200.Google Scholar
Nielson, D.L. Tierney, M.J. (2003), ‘Delegation to international organizations: agency theory and World Bank environmental reform’, International Organization 57(2): 241–276.Google Scholar
Nielson, D.L., Tierney, M.J. Weaver, C.A. (2006), ‘Bridging the rationalist–constructivist divide: re-engineering the culture of the World Bank’, Journal of International Relations and Development 9(2): 107–139.Google Scholar
Nsouli, S.M. (1999), ‘A decade of transition: an overview of the achievements and challenges’, Finance & Development 36(2), available at http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/1999/06/nsouli.htm Google Scholar
Park, S. (2010), The World Bank Group and Environmentalists: Changing International Organisation Identities, London: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Park, S. Vetterlein, A. (eds) (2010), Owning Development: Creating Global Policy Norms in the World Bank and the IMF, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (2000), ‘Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics’, American Political Science Review 94(2): 251–267.Google Scholar
Porter, T. (2005), Globalization and Finance, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Radelet, S. Sachs, J.D. (1998), ‘The east Asian financial crisis: diagnosis, remedies, prospects’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1: 1–74.Google Scholar
Sabatier, P. (1998), ‘The advocacy coalition framework: revisions and relevance for Europe’, Journal of European Public Policy 5(1): 98–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schinasi, G.J., Truman, E.M. (2010), ‘Reform of the Global Financial Architecture’. Working Paper Series of the Peterson Institute for International Economics WP 10–14.Google Scholar
Steffek, J. (2010), ‘Explaining patterns of transnational participation: the role of policy fields’, in C. Jonsson and J. Tallberg (eds), Transnational Actors in Global Governance: Patterns, Explanations, and Implications, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 67–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, W. Thelen, K. (eds) (2005), Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thelen, K. (2003), ‘How institutions evolve: insights from comparative historical analysis’, in J. Mahoney and D. Rueschemeyer (eds), Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 208–240.Google Scholar
Thelen, K. (2004), How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vetterlein, A. (2007), ‘Economic growth, poverty reduction and the role of social policies. The evolution of the World Bank's social development approach’, Global Governance 13(4): 513–533.Google Scholar
Walter, A. (2008), Governing Finance: East Asia's Adoption of International Standards, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Weaver, C. (2008), Hypocrisy Trap: The World Bank and the Poverty of Reform, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Willets, P. (2000), ‘From ‘Consultative arrangements’ to ‘Partnership’: the changing status of NGOs in diplomacy at the UN’, Global Governance 6(2): 191–212.Google Scholar