Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T21:39:11.471Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Second Intifada

A Dual Strategy Arena

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 April 2016

Nada Matta  and
René Rojas
Nada Matta
Affiliation:
New York University [nm1100@nyu.edu].
René Rojas
Affiliation:
New York University [rer271@nyu.edu].
Get access

Abstract

Dominant theories fail to explain the use of terror during the Second Palestinian Intifada. Notably, they fail to explain Hamas’s abandonment of suicide attacks by 2005. We classified the universe of fatalities on both sides and examined the conflict’s patterns of lethal violence. Our analysis of fatality ratios and rates of change by fatality category supports a dual-arena theory of terror. Noting a rapid increase of indiscriminate Israeli civilian deaths and a relative evening out within this category in the conflict’s initial phase, we demonstrate that externally Hamas aimed to improve the balance of forces to compel Israel to negotiate on equal terms using the “out-suffering” mechanism. Internally, Hamas used terror to build confrontational capacity by attracting Palestinian factions to a resistance pole and isolating conciliatory elites. When their continued deployment became too costly relative to emerging options, the campaign was swiftly called off. In the end, while based on strategic calculations, Hamas’s use of terror proved to be a failure.

Résumé

Les théories dominantes peinent à expliquer l’usage de la terreur au cours de la seconde Intifada palestinienne. Elles échouent en particulier à expliquer l’abandon par le Hamas du recours aux attaques suicides dès 2005. Cet article est basé sur la classification des décès pour les deux parties du conflit et l’examen de la variété des types de violence léthale. L’étude des ratio de décès et des taux de changement par catégorie vient à l’appui d’une théorie de la terreur dite de la « double arène ». A partir de l’observation des variations des morts civils israéliens indiscriminés durant les différentes phases du conflit, nous démontrons que, d’un point de vue externe, l’objectif du Hamas a été de modifier l’équilibre des forces pour contraindre Israël à négocier dans des termes plus avantageux. D’un point de vue interne, le Hamas a utilisé la terreur pour consolider sa capacité confrontationnelle en unifiant les factions palestiniennes autour d’un pôle de résistance et en isolant les élites les plus conciliantes. Lorsque cette stratégie s’est révélée trop coûteuse, la campagne a rapidement été interrompue. Au final, bien que fondé sur des calculs stratégiques, l’usage de la terreur par le Hamas s’est révélé être un échec.

Zusammenfassung

Der Terroreinsatz während der zweiten Intifada kann nur schwer durch herkömmliche Theorien erklärt werden. Es bleibt vor allen Dingen ungeklärt, weshalb die Hamas seit 2005 auf Selbstmordattentate verzichtet. Diese Untersuchung stützt sich auf die Klassifizierung der Todesursache beider am Konflikt beteiligten Parteien und analysiert die Verschiedenartigkeit der tödlichen Gewaltakte. Die Studie der Todesquoten und der Wechselrate je nach Kategorie verhärtet die Theorie der sogenannten doppelten Arena. Ausgehend von einem rasanten Anstieg der „indiskriminierten“ Todesursache bei israelischen Zivilisten und einem relativen Ausgleich innerhalb dieser Kategorie zu Beginn des Konflikts, zeigen wir, dass die Hamas nach außen versucht hat, das Kräftespiel zu ihren Gunsten zu verändern und günstigere Verhandlungsbedingungen von den Israelis zu erzwingen. Nach innen hat die Hamas den Terror benutzt, um ihre Konfrontationsfähigkeit auszubauen, indem sie palästinensische Faktionen in einem Widerstandspol vereint und konziliante Eliten isoliert hat. Schließlich ist der Terroreinsatz der Hamas gescheitert und dies trotz strategischem Kalkül.

Keywords

TerrorismResistancePolitical Opportunity StructureOccupationStrategic ActionDomestic ContentionHamasIntifadaTerrorismeRésistanceStructure d'opportunité politiqueStratégie d'occupationContention domestiqueHamasIntifadaTerrorismusWiderstandPolitische GelegenheitsstrukturBerufStrategische ActionDomestic ContentionHamasIntifada
Type
Structures of Violence
Information
European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie , Volume 57 , Issue 1 , April 2016 , pp. 65 - 113
Copyright
Copyright © A.E.S. 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Aljazeera, 2004. “Haniyeh Speech” October 3. Accessed February 23, 2012, www.aljazeera.net/portal/templates/postings/pocketpcdetail.Google Scholar
Alwatan Voice, 2004. “Mishaal: We Suggested a Hudna In Exchange For Evacuating Gaza and The West Bank”, February 22, 2004. ّAccessed August 25, 2015, http://www.alwatanvoice.com/arabic/content/print/3468.html.Google Scholar
B’Tselem. Accessed January 20, 2012, http://www.btselem.org/statistics. Institute For Economics and Peace, 2014. “Global Terrorism Index 2014.” Accessed November 15, 2014, http://www.visionofhumanity.org/#/page/our-gti-findings.Google Scholar
Global Security, 2013. “Mohammad Dahlan”. Accessed September 1, 2013, http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/palestine/mohammed_dahlan.htm\.Google Scholar
Institute For Economics and Peace. “Global Terrorism Index 2014.” Accessed November 15, 2014, http://www.visionofhumanity.org/#/page/our-gti-findings.Google Scholar
Israeli Government, 2015. “Reports”. Accessed September 10, http://www.shabak.gov.il/English/EnTerrorData/Reports/Pages/default.aspx.Google Scholar
Jerusalem Media and Communication Centre. “On Palestinian Attitudes Towards Politics”, No. 33 October, 1999. Accessed March 20, 2012, http://www.jmcc.org/documentsandmaps.aspx?id=469.Google Scholar
Jerusalem Media and Communication Centre, 2000a. “On Palestinian Attitudes Towards Final Status Negotiations and the Declaration of the State”, No. 37 June, 2000. Accessed March 20, 2012, http://www.jmcc.org/documentsandmaps.aspx?id=463.Google Scholar
Jerusalem Media and Communication Centre, 2000b. “On Palestinian Attitudes Towards Politics including the Current Intifada”, Part 1, No. 39 December, 2000. Accessed February 15, 2012, http://www.jmcc.org/documentsandmaps.aspx?id=460.Google Scholar
Jerusalem Media and Communication Centre, 2000c. “Four Months After the Beginning of the Palestinian Intifada: Attitudes of the Israeli and Palestinian Publics towards the Peace Process”, Part 2, No. 39 December, 2000. Accessed March 19, 2012, http://www.jmcc.org/documentsandmaps.aspx?id=461.Google Scholar
Jerusalem Media and Communication Centre, 2001a. “On Palestinian Attitudes Towards Politics Including the Current Intifada”, No. 40 April 2001. Accessed October 13, 2012, http://www.jmcc.org/documentsandmaps.aspx?id=459.Google Scholar
Jerusalem Media and Communication Centre, 2001b. “On Palestinian Attitudes Towards Politics Including the Current Intifada”, No. 41 June, 2001. Accessed November 15, 2012, http://www.jmcc.org/documentsandmaps.aspx?id=458.Google Scholar
Jerusalem Media and Communication Centre, 2001c. Untitled. No. 42 September 2001. Accessed October 13, 2012, http://www.jmcc.org/documentsandmaps.aspx?id=457.Google Scholar
Jerusalem Media and Communication Centre, 2001d. “On Palestinian Attitudes Towards Politics Including the Current Intifada”, No. 43 December, 2001. Accessed November 15, 2012, http://www.jmcc.org/documentsandmaps.aspx?id=456.Google Scholar
Jerusalem Media and Communication Centre, 2002a. “On Palestinian Attitudes Towards the Palestinian Situation in General”, No. 44 March, 2002. Accessed November 15, 2012, http://www.jmcc.org/documentsandmaps.aspx?id=455.Google Scholar
Jerusalem Media and Communication Centre, 2002b. “On The Palestinian Attitudes Towards the Palestinian Situation in General”, No. 45 May 29-June 2, 2002. Accessed October 14, 2012, http://www.jmcc.org/documentsandmaps.aspx?id=454.Google Scholar
Jerusalem Media and Communication Centre, 2002c. “On Palestinian Attitudes Towards the Palestinian Situation and the Second Anniversary of the Intifada”, No. 46 September 21-25, 2002. Accessed October 14, 2012, http://www.jmcc.org/documentsandmaps.aspx?id=453.Google Scholar
Jerusalem Media and Communication Centre, 2002d. “Poll Results On Palestinian Attitudes Towards the Palestinian Situation in General”, No. 47 December, 2002. Accessed October 14, 2012, http://www.jmcc.org/documentsandmaps.aspx?id=452.Google Scholar
Jerusalem Media and Communication Centre, 2003a. “On Palestinian Attitudes to the Palestinian Situation in General”, No. 48 April, 2003. Accessed November 15, 2012, http://www.jmcc.org/documentsandmaps.aspx?id=451.Google Scholar
Jerusalem Media and Communication Centre, 2003b. “Public Opinion Poll on Palestinian Attitudes Towards the Palestinian Situation after the Third Anniversary of the Intifada”, No. 49 October, 2003. Accessed November 15, 2012, http://www.jmcc.org/documentsandmaps.aspx?id=450.Google Scholar
Jerusalem Media and Communication Centre, 2004a. “On Palestinian Attitudes Towards the Palestinian Political Issues and the Intifada”, No. 51 June, 2004. Accessed October 10, 2012. http://www.jmcc.org/documentsandmaps.aspx?id=449.Google Scholar
Jerusalem Media and Communication Centre, 2004b. “On Palestinian Attitudes to the Palestinian Political Issues”, No. 52 December, 2004. Accessed November 15, 2012, http://www.jmcc.org/documentsandmaps.aspx?id=448.Google Scholar
Jerusalem Media and Communication Centre, 2005. “On Palestinian Attitudes Towards the Upcoming Legislative Elections and other Political Issues”, No. 55 December, 2005. Accessed November 15, 2012, http://www.jmcc.org/documentsandmaps.aspx?id=445.Google Scholar
Jerusalem Media and Communication Centre, 2006. “On Palestinian Attitudes towards the Results of the PLC Elections Held on January 25, 2006”, No. 57 February, 2006. Accessed November 15, 2012, http://www.jmcc.org/documentsandmaps.aspx?id=443.Google Scholar
Palestinian Discussion Forum (paldf), 2004. “Mr Khalid Mishaal: Reform Should be Comprehensive, in the Monetary, Security and Political Spheres, and By Ending Autocratic Palestinian Decision Making”, August 1. Accessed August 4, 2015, https://www.paldf.net/forum/showthread.php?t=19244.Google Scholar
Palestinian Information Center, 2001. “Committed to Martyrdom Operations and the Harmony with Fateh Helped Widen Confrontations”, March 14. Accessed March 20, 2012, http://www.palestine-info.com/arabic/hamas/statements/interviews/14_3_ghosheh.htm.Google Scholar
Palestinian Information Center, 2003a. “Discussion with Khalid Mishaal in (What Comes After) On Al-Manar TV”, March 12. Accessed March 20, 2012, http://www.palestine-info.com/arabic/hamas/hewar/mashal_manar.htm.Google Scholar
Palestinian Information Center, 2003b. “Inclusive Discussion with Dr Abedl Aziz Rantisi”, March 30. Accessed March 20, 2012, http://www.palestine-info.com/arabic/hamas/hewar/rantesi%281%29.htm.Google Scholar
Palestinian Information Center, 2003c. “They Hoped for Internal Strife But With God’s Help We United”, March 30. Accessed September 20, 2013, http://www.palestine-info.com/arabic/hamas/statements/2003/11_6_03.htm.Google Scholar
Palestinian Information Center, 2003d. “Rafat Nasif Hamas Representative in TulKarem”, June 8 Accessed April 10, 2012, http://www.palestine-info.com/arabic/hamas/hewar/nasef.htm.Google Scholar
Palestinian Information Center, 2003e. “We Will Not Drop Our Weapons Before the Occupation Ends”, June 10. Accessed September 20, 2013, http://www.palestine-info.com/arabic/hamas/statements/2003/30_4_03.htm.Google Scholar
Palestinian Information Center, 2003f. “Khalid Mishaal Speaks About the Relationship Between Hamas and The Palestinian Authority”, August 25. Accessed March 11, 2012, http://www.palestine-info.com/arabic/hamas/hewar/kalide.htm.Google Scholar
Palestinian Information Center, 2003g. “Debate with Sheikh Ahamd Yassin: The Martyrdom of Abu Shanab Benefits Hamas”, August 28. Accessed May 21, 2012, http://www.palestine-info.com/arabic/hamas/hewar/yaseen2.htm.Google Scholar
Palestinian Information Center, 2003h. “Khalid Mishaal in a Discussion with Al-Hayat Journal”, December 7. Accessed March 15, 2012, http://www.palestine-info.com/arabic/hamas/hewar/khalied_meshaal.htm.Google Scholar
Palestinian Information Center, 2004a. “Haniyeh: Hamas has Many Leaders and Our Operations are Conducted Based on Considerations of Liberation. We Do Not Submit to Retaliation or Revenge Impulses”, April 20. Accessed March 12, 2012, http://www.palestine-info.com/arabic/hamas/hewar/2004/haneyah.htm.Google Scholar
Palestinian Information Center, 2004b. “Head of Hamas Political Bureau on Arafat’s Death and on the Current Political Situation”, November 20. Accessed February 10, 2012, http://www.palestine-info.com/arabic/hamas/hewar/2004/mishal2.htm.Google Scholar
Palestinian Information Center, 2005. “Mishaal’s Speech at the Founding Conference of the International Campaign to Resist Assaults”, February 23. Accessed February 20, 2012, http://www.palestine-info.com/arabic/hamas/hewar/2005/mesh3al05.htm.Google Scholar
Palestinian Information Center, 2010a. “Mishaal Speaks About the Strategies of Managing the Struggle with the Zionist Enemy”, July 21. Accessed March 10, 2012, https://www.palinfo.com/site/pic/newsdetails.aspx?ItemId=39723.Google Scholar
Palestinian Information Center, 2010b. “Zahar: Arafat Instructed Hamas to Conduct Military Operations”, September 28. Accessed September 5 2015, https://www.palinfo.com/site/pic/newsdetails.aspx?ItemId=67.Google Scholar
United Nations, 2015. “Report of the Independent Commission of Inquiry on the 2014 Gaza Conflict”, Accessed September 10, 2015, http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/HRC/CoIGazaConflict/Pages/ReportCoIGaza.aspx.Google Scholar
Abrahms, Max, 2008. “What Terrorists Really Want: Terrorist Motives and Counterterrorism Strategy”, International Security, 32 (4): 78-105.Google Scholar
Alimi, Eitan, 2009. “Mobilizing under the Gun: Theorizing Political Opportunity Structure in a Highly Repressive Setting”, Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 14 (2): 219-237.Google Scholar
Amayreh, Khaled, 2005. “Is the Hudna Over?” Al-Ahram Weekly, (14–20 August, 651). Accessed February 4, 2014, http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2003/651/re1.htm.Google Scholar
Araj, Bader, 2008. “Harsh State Repression As a Cause of Suicide Bombing: The Case of The Palestinian-Israeli Conflict”, Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 31 (4): 284-303.Google Scholar
Asal, Victor and Rethemeyer, R. Karl, 2008. “The Nature of the Beast: Organizational Structures and the Lethality of Terrorist Attacks”, The Journal of Politics, 70 (02): 437-449.Google Scholar
Benmelech, Efraim, Berrebi, Claude and Klor, Esteban, 2012. “Economic Conditions and the Quality of Suicide Terrorism”, The Journal of Politics, 74 (1): 113-128.Google Scholar
Bloom, Mia M., 2004. “Palestinian Suicide Bombing: Public Support, Market Share, and Outbidding”, Political Science Quarterly, 119 (1): 61-88.Google Scholar
Brym, Robert J. and Araj, Bader, 2006. “Suicide Bombing as Strategy and Interaction: The Case of the Second Intifada”, Social Forces, 84 (4): 1969-1986.Google Scholar
Brym, Robert J. and Araj, Bader, 2008. “Palestinian Suicide Bombing Revisited: A Critique of the Outbidding Thesis”, Political Science Quarterly, 123 (3): 485-500.Google Scholar
Byman, Daniel, 2012. “Curious Victory: Explaining Israel’s Suppression of the Second Intifada”, Terrorism and Political Violence, 24 (5): 825-852.Google Scholar
Craner, Lorne, 2006. “Will U.S. Democratization Policy Work? Democracy in the Middle East”, Middle East Quarterly, 13 (3): 3-10. Accessed August 2, 2015, http://www.meforum.org/942/will-us-democratization-policy-work.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, Martha, 1981. “The Causes of Terrorism”, Comparative Politics, 13 (4): 379-399.Google Scholar
Dale, Stephen F., 1988. “Religious Suicide in Islamic Asia: Anticolonial Terrorism in India, Indonesia, and the Philippines”, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 32 (1): 37-59.Google Scholar
Della Porta, Donatella, 2013. Clandestine Political Violence (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Della Porta, Donatella and Tarrow, Sidney, 1986. “Unwanted Children: Political Violence and the Cycle of Protest in Italy, 1966-173”, European Journal of Political Research, 14 (2-6): 607-632.Google Scholar
Gambetta, Diego and Steffen, Herto, 2009. “Why Are There So Many Engineers Among Islamic Radicals”, European Journal of Sociology, 50 (2): 201-230.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Jeff, 2004. “Review Essay: What Must We Explain to Explain Terrorism? Terror in the Name of God: Why Religious Militants Kill by Jessica Stern”, Social Movement Studies, 4: 259-261.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Jeff, 2006. “A Theory of Categorical Terrorism”, Social Forces, 84 (4): 2027-2046.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Jeff, 2007. “ ‘The Struggle Made me a Noracialist’: Why there was so Little Terrorism in the Apartheid Struggle”, Mobilizations: An International Quarterly Review, 12 (2): 193-203.Google Scholar
Gordon, Neve, 2008. “From Colonization to Separation: Exploring the Structure of Israel's Occupation”, Third World Quarterly, 29 (1): 25-44.Google Scholar
Gunning, Jeroen, 2009. Hamas in Politics: Democracy, Religion, Violence (New York, Columbia University Press).Google Scholar
Haeuveni, Eyal, 2012 (October). “Asserted Development: The Long Term Impact of Israeli’s Separation Barrier in the West Bank”, B’Tselem. Accessed October 15, 2014, http://www.btselem.org/sites/default/files2/201210_arrested_development_eng.pdf.Google Scholar
Hafez, Mohammed M., 2006. “Rationality, Culture, and Structure in the Making of Suicide Bombers: A Preliminary Theoretical Synthesis”, Studies In Conflict And Terrorism, 29 (2): 165-185.Google Scholar
Hammami, Rema and Tamari, Salim, 2001. “The Second Uprising: End or New Beginning?”, Journal of Palestine Studies, 30 (2): 5-25.Google Scholar
Hatuqa, Dalia, 2014. “Jerusalem Attacks Likely do not Portend a Third Palestinian Intifada”, Aljazeera (November 18), Accessed September 3, 2015, http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2014/11/18/why-talk-of-a-thirdpalestinianintifadaispremature.html.Google Scholar
Herzog, Michael, 2006 (March/April). “Can Hamas Be Tamed?” Foreign Affairs, Accessed August 2, 2015, https://www.foreignaffairs.org/articles/israel/2006-03-01/can-hamas-be-tamed.Google Scholar
Hroub, Khalid, 2004. “Hamas After Shaykh Yasinand Rantisi”, Journal of Palestine Studies, 33 (4): 21-38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johannsen, Margret, 2009. “From resistance to State Building: Dealing with The Ambiguities of the Hamas Takeover”, Security and Peace, 27 (3): 180-185.Google Scholar
Kapsit, Ben, 2002. “Jewish New Year 2002: The Second Anniversary of the Intifada”, Part I. Ma’ariv, September 6.Google Scholar
Kimhi, Shaul and Even, Shemuel, 2004. “Who Are the Palestinian Suicide Bombers?”, Terrorism and Political Violence, 16 (4): 815-840.Google Scholar
Kydd, Andrew and Walter, Barbara F., 2002. “Sabotaging the Peace: The Politics of Extremist Violence”, International Organization, 56 (2): 263-296.Google Scholar
Li, Darryl, 2006. “The Gaza Strip as Laboratory: Notes in the Wake of Disengagement”, Journal of Palestine Studies, 25 (2): 38-55.Google Scholar
Lyall, Jason, 2009. “Does Indiscriminate Violence Incite Insurgent Attacks? Evidence from Chechnya”, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 53 (3): 331-362.Google Scholar
Maoz, Zeev, 2009. Defending the Holy Land (Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press).Google Scholar
McGirk, Tim, 2009. “Rift Between Hamas and Fateh Grows After Gaza”, Time World, February 7. Accessed September 1, 2013, http://content.time.com/time/world/article/0, 8599, 1877640,00.html.Google Scholar
Moghadam, Assaf, 2006. “Suicide Terrorism, Occupation, and the Globalization of Martyrdom: A Critique of Dying to Win”, Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 29 (8): 707-729.Google Scholar
Pape, Robert, 2003. “The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism”, American Political Science Review, 97 (03): 343-361.Google Scholar
Pape, Robert, 2005. Dying to Win: The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism (New York, Random House).Google Scholar
Pape, Robert A. and Feldman, James K, 2010. Cutting the Fuse: The Explosion of Global Suicide Terrorism and How to Stop it (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Pearlman, Wendy, 2011. Violence, Nonviolence, and the Palestinian National Movement (New York, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Pehahzur, Ami, and Perliger, Arie, 2006. “The Changing Nature of Suicide Attacks: A Social Network Perspective”, Social Forces, 84 (4): 1987-2008.Google Scholar
Pedahzur, Ami, Perliger, Arie and Weinberg, Leonard, 2003. “Altruism and Fatalism: The Characteristics of Palestinian Suicide Terrorists”, Deviant Behavior, 24 (4): 405-423.Google Scholar
Pressman, Jeremy, 2003. “The Second Intifada: Background and Causes of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict”, Journal of Conflict Studies, 23 (2): 114-141.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert, 1988. “Diplomacy And Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games”, International Organization, 42 (3): 427-460.Google Scholar
Shamir, Jacob and Shikaki, Khalil, 2010. Palestinian and Israeli Public Opinion, The Public Imperative in the Second Intifada (Bloomington, Indiana University Press).Google Scholar
Shatz, Adam, 2011. “Is Palestine Next”, London Review of Books, 33 (14): 8-14.Google Scholar
Johannsen, Margret, 2009. “From resistance to State Building: Dealing with The Ambiguities of the Hamas Takeover”, Security and Peace, 27 (3): 180-185.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles, 1978. From Mobilization to Revolution (Reading Mass., Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.).Google Scholar
Usher, Graham, 2005a (March 24-30). “The Calm Before the Storm”, Al-Ahram Weekly, Accessed June 1, 2012, http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/Archive/2005/735/re1.htm.Google Scholar
Usher, Graham, 2005b (August 22). “The New Hamas”, Middle East Report Online, Accessed May 13, 2012, http://www.merip.org/mero/mero082105.html.Google Scholar
Usher, Graham, 2006. “The Democratic Resistance: Hamas, Fatah and the Palestinian Elections”, Journal of Palestine Studies, 25 (3): 20-36.Google Scholar
Wood, Elisabeth Jean, 2000. Forging Democracy from Below: Insurgent Transitions in South Africa and El Salvador (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Aljazeera, 2004. “Haniyeh Speech” October 3. Accessed February 23, 2012, www.aljazeera.net/portal/templates/postings/pocketpcdetail.Google Scholar
Alwatan Voice, 2004. “Mishaal: We Suggested a Hudna In Exchange For Evacuating Gaza and The West Bank”, February 22, 2004. ّAccessed August 25, 2015, http://www.alwatanvoice.com/arabic/content/print/3468.html.Google Scholar
B’Tselem. Accessed January 20, 2012, http://www.btselem.org/statistics. Institute For Economics and Peace, 2014. “Global Terrorism Index 2014.” Accessed November 15, 2014, http://www.visionofhumanity.org/#/page/our-gti-findings.Google Scholar
Global Security, 2013. “Mohammad Dahlan”. Accessed September 1, 2013, http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/palestine/mohammed_dahlan.htm\.Google Scholar
Institute For Economics and Peace. “Global Terrorism Index 2014.” Accessed November 15, 2014, http://www.visionofhumanity.org/#/page/our-gti-findings.Google Scholar
Israeli Government, 2015. “Reports”. Accessed September 10, http://www.shabak.gov.il/English/EnTerrorData/Reports/Pages/default.aspx.Google Scholar
Jerusalem Media and Communication Centre. “On Palestinian Attitudes Towards Politics”, No. 33 October, 1999. Accessed March 20, 2012, http://www.jmcc.org/documentsandmaps.aspx?id=469.Google Scholar
Jerusalem Media and Communication Centre, 2000a. “On Palestinian Attitudes Towards Final Status Negotiations and the Declaration of the State”, No. 37 June, 2000. Accessed March 20, 2012, http://www.jmcc.org/documentsandmaps.aspx?id=463.Google Scholar
Jerusalem Media and Communication Centre, 2000b. “On Palestinian Attitudes Towards Politics including the Current Intifada”, Part 1, No. 39 December, 2000. Accessed February 15, 2012, http://www.jmcc.org/documentsandmaps.aspx?id=460.Google Scholar
Jerusalem Media and Communication Centre, 2000c. “Four Months After the Beginning of the Palestinian Intifada: Attitudes of the Israeli and Palestinian Publics towards the Peace Process”, Part 2, No. 39 December, 2000. Accessed March 19, 2012, http://www.jmcc.org/documentsandmaps.aspx?id=461.Google Scholar
Jerusalem Media and Communication Centre, 2001a. “On Palestinian Attitudes Towards Politics Including the Current Intifada”, No. 40 April 2001. Accessed October 13, 2012, http://www.jmcc.org/documentsandmaps.aspx?id=459.Google Scholar
Jerusalem Media and Communication Centre, 2001b. “On Palestinian Attitudes Towards Politics Including the Current Intifada”, No. 41 June, 2001. Accessed November 15, 2012, http://www.jmcc.org/documentsandmaps.aspx?id=458.Google Scholar
Jerusalem Media and Communication Centre, 2001c. Untitled. No. 42 September 2001. Accessed October 13, 2012, http://www.jmcc.org/documentsandmaps.aspx?id=457.Google Scholar
Jerusalem Media and Communication Centre, 2001d. “On Palestinian Attitudes Towards Politics Including the Current Intifada”, No. 43 December, 2001. Accessed November 15, 2012, http://www.jmcc.org/documentsandmaps.aspx?id=456.Google Scholar
Jerusalem Media and Communication Centre, 2002a. “On Palestinian Attitudes Towards the Palestinian Situation in General”, No. 44 March, 2002. Accessed November 15, 2012, http://www.jmcc.org/documentsandmaps.aspx?id=455.Google Scholar
Jerusalem Media and Communication Centre, 2002b. “On The Palestinian Attitudes Towards the Palestinian Situation in General”, No. 45 May 29-June 2, 2002. Accessed October 14, 2012, http://www.jmcc.org/documentsandmaps.aspx?id=454.Google Scholar
Jerusalem Media and Communication Centre, 2002c. “On Palestinian Attitudes Towards the Palestinian Situation and the Second Anniversary of the Intifada”, No. 46 September 21-25, 2002. Accessed October 14, 2012, http://www.jmcc.org/documentsandmaps.aspx?id=453.Google Scholar
Jerusalem Media and Communication Centre, 2002d. “Poll Results On Palestinian Attitudes Towards the Palestinian Situation in General”, No. 47 December, 2002. Accessed October 14, 2012, http://www.jmcc.org/documentsandmaps.aspx?id=452.Google Scholar
Jerusalem Media and Communication Centre, 2003a. “On Palestinian Attitudes to the Palestinian Situation in General”, No. 48 April, 2003. Accessed November 15, 2012, http://www.jmcc.org/documentsandmaps.aspx?id=451.Google Scholar
Jerusalem Media and Communication Centre, 2003b. “Public Opinion Poll on Palestinian Attitudes Towards the Palestinian Situation after the Third Anniversary of the Intifada”, No. 49 October, 2003. Accessed November 15, 2012, http://www.jmcc.org/documentsandmaps.aspx?id=450.Google Scholar
Jerusalem Media and Communication Centre, 2004a. “On Palestinian Attitudes Towards the Palestinian Political Issues and the Intifada”, No. 51 June, 2004. Accessed October 10, 2012. http://www.jmcc.org/documentsandmaps.aspx?id=449.Google Scholar
Jerusalem Media and Communication Centre, 2004b. “On Palestinian Attitudes to the Palestinian Political Issues”, No. 52 December, 2004. Accessed November 15, 2012, http://www.jmcc.org/documentsandmaps.aspx?id=448.Google Scholar
Jerusalem Media and Communication Centre, 2005. “On Palestinian Attitudes Towards the Upcoming Legislative Elections and other Political Issues”, No. 55 December, 2005. Accessed November 15, 2012, http://www.jmcc.org/documentsandmaps.aspx?id=445.Google Scholar
Jerusalem Media and Communication Centre, 2006. “On Palestinian Attitudes towards the Results of the PLC Elections Held on January 25, 2006”, No. 57 February, 2006. Accessed November 15, 2012, http://www.jmcc.org/documentsandmaps.aspx?id=443.Google Scholar
Palestinian Discussion Forum (paldf), 2004. “Mr Khalid Mishaal: Reform Should be Comprehensive, in the Monetary, Security and Political Spheres, and By Ending Autocratic Palestinian Decision Making”, August 1. Accessed August 4, 2015, https://www.paldf.net/forum/showthread.php?t=19244.Google Scholar
Palestinian Information Center, 2001. “Committed to Martyrdom Operations and the Harmony with Fateh Helped Widen Confrontations”, March 14. Accessed March 20, 2012, http://www.palestine-info.com/arabic/hamas/statements/interviews/14_3_ghosheh.htm.Google Scholar
Palestinian Information Center, 2003a. “Discussion with Khalid Mishaal in (What Comes After) On Al-Manar TV”, March 12. Accessed March 20, 2012, http://www.palestine-info.com/arabic/hamas/hewar/mashal_manar.htm.Google Scholar
Palestinian Information Center, 2003b. “Inclusive Discussion with Dr Abedl Aziz Rantisi”, March 30. Accessed March 20, 2012, http://www.palestine-info.com/arabic/hamas/hewar/rantesi%281%29.htm.Google Scholar
Palestinian Information Center, 2003c. “They Hoped for Internal Strife But With God’s Help We United”, March 30. Accessed September 20, 2013, http://www.palestine-info.com/arabic/hamas/statements/2003/11_6_03.htm.Google Scholar
Palestinian Information Center, 2003d. “Rafat Nasif Hamas Representative in TulKarem”, June 8 Accessed April 10, 2012, http://www.palestine-info.com/arabic/hamas/hewar/nasef.htm.Google Scholar
Palestinian Information Center, 2003e. “We Will Not Drop Our Weapons Before the Occupation Ends”, June 10. Accessed September 20, 2013, http://www.palestine-info.com/arabic/hamas/statements/2003/30_4_03.htm.Google Scholar
Palestinian Information Center, 2003f. “Khalid Mishaal Speaks About the Relationship Between Hamas and The Palestinian Authority”, August 25. Accessed March 11, 2012, http://www.palestine-info.com/arabic/hamas/hewar/kalide.htm.Google Scholar
Palestinian Information Center, 2003g. “Debate with Sheikh Ahamd Yassin: The Martyrdom of Abu Shanab Benefits Hamas”, August 28. Accessed May 21, 2012, http://www.palestine-info.com/arabic/hamas/hewar/yaseen2.htm.Google Scholar
Palestinian Information Center, 2003h. “Khalid Mishaal in a Discussion with Al-Hayat Journal”, December 7. Accessed March 15, 2012, http://www.palestine-info.com/arabic/hamas/hewar/khalied_meshaal.htm.Google Scholar
Palestinian Information Center, 2004a. “Haniyeh: Hamas has Many Leaders and Our Operations are Conducted Based on Considerations of Liberation. We Do Not Submit to Retaliation or Revenge Impulses”, April 20. Accessed March 12, 2012, http://www.palestine-info.com/arabic/hamas/hewar/2004/haneyah.htm.Google Scholar
Palestinian Information Center, 2004b. “Head of Hamas Political Bureau on Arafat’s Death and on the Current Political Situation”, November 20. Accessed February 10, 2012, http://www.palestine-info.com/arabic/hamas/hewar/2004/mishal2.htm.Google Scholar
Palestinian Information Center, 2005. “Mishaal’s Speech at the Founding Conference of the International Campaign to Resist Assaults”, February 23. Accessed February 20, 2012, http://www.palestine-info.com/arabic/hamas/hewar/2005/mesh3al05.htm.Google Scholar
Palestinian Information Center, 2010a. “Mishaal Speaks About the Strategies of Managing the Struggle with the Zionist Enemy”, July 21. Accessed March 10, 2012, https://www.palinfo.com/site/pic/newsdetails.aspx?ItemId=39723.Google Scholar
Palestinian Information Center, 2010b. “Zahar: Arafat Instructed Hamas to Conduct Military Operations”, September 28. Accessed September 5 2015, https://www.palinfo.com/site/pic/newsdetails.aspx?ItemId=67.Google Scholar
United Nations, 2015. “Report of the Independent Commission of Inquiry on the 2014 Gaza Conflict”, Accessed September 10, 2015, http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/HRC/CoIGazaConflict/Pages/ReportCoIGaza.aspx.Google Scholar
Abrahms, Max, 2008. “What Terrorists Really Want: Terrorist Motives and Counterterrorism Strategy”, International Security, 32 (4): 78-105.Google Scholar
Alimi, Eitan, 2009. “Mobilizing under the Gun: Theorizing Political Opportunity Structure in a Highly Repressive Setting”, Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 14 (2): 219-237.Google Scholar
Amayreh, Khaled, 2005. “Is the Hudna Over?” Al-Ahram Weekly, (14–20 August, 651). Accessed February 4, 2014, http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2003/651/re1.htm.Google Scholar
Araj, Bader, 2008. “Harsh State Repression As a Cause of Suicide Bombing: The Case of The Palestinian-Israeli Conflict”, Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 31 (4): 284-303.Google Scholar
Asal, Victor and Rethemeyer, R. Karl, 2008. “The Nature of the Beast: Organizational Structures and the Lethality of Terrorist Attacks”, The Journal of Politics, 70 (02): 437-449.Google Scholar
Benmelech, Efraim, Berrebi, Claude and Klor, Esteban, 2012. “Economic Conditions and the Quality of Suicide Terrorism”, The Journal of Politics, 74 (1): 113-128.Google Scholar
Bloom, Mia M., 2004. “Palestinian Suicide Bombing: Public Support, Market Share, and Outbidding”, Political Science Quarterly, 119 (1): 61-88.Google Scholar
Brym, Robert J. and Araj, Bader, 2006. “Suicide Bombing as Strategy and Interaction: The Case of the Second Intifada”, Social Forces, 84 (4): 1969-1986.Google Scholar
Brym, Robert J. and Araj, Bader, 2008. “Palestinian Suicide Bombing Revisited: A Critique of the Outbidding Thesis”, Political Science Quarterly, 123 (3): 485-500.Google Scholar
Byman, Daniel, 2012. “Curious Victory: Explaining Israel’s Suppression of the Second Intifada”, Terrorism and Political Violence, 24 (5): 825-852.Google Scholar
Craner, Lorne, 2006. “Will U.S. Democratization Policy Work? Democracy in the Middle East”, Middle East Quarterly, 13 (3): 3-10. Accessed August 2, 2015, http://www.meforum.org/942/will-us-democratization-policy-work.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, Martha, 1981. “The Causes of Terrorism”, Comparative Politics, 13 (4): 379-399.Google Scholar
Dale, Stephen F., 1988. “Religious Suicide in Islamic Asia: Anticolonial Terrorism in India, Indonesia, and the Philippines”, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 32 (1): 37-59.Google Scholar
Della Porta, Donatella, 2013. Clandestine Political Violence (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Della Porta, Donatella and Tarrow, Sidney, 1986. “Unwanted Children: Political Violence and the Cycle of Protest in Italy, 1966-173”, European Journal of Political Research, 14 (2-6): 607-632.Google Scholar
Gambetta, Diego and Steffen, Herto, 2009. “Why Are There So Many Engineers Among Islamic Radicals”, European Journal of Sociology, 50 (2): 201-230.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Jeff, 2004. “Review Essay: What Must We Explain to Explain Terrorism? Terror in the Name of God: Why Religious Militants Kill by Jessica Stern”, Social Movement Studies, 4: 259-261.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Jeff, 2006. “A Theory of Categorical Terrorism”, Social Forces, 84 (4): 2027-2046.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Jeff, 2007. “ ‘The Struggle Made me a Noracialist’: Why there was so Little Terrorism in the Apartheid Struggle”, Mobilizations: An International Quarterly Review, 12 (2): 193-203.Google Scholar
Gordon, Neve, 2008. “From Colonization to Separation: Exploring the Structure of Israel's Occupation”, Third World Quarterly, 29 (1): 25-44.Google Scholar
Gunning, Jeroen, 2009. Hamas in Politics: Democracy, Religion, Violence (New York, Columbia University Press).Google Scholar
Haeuveni, Eyal, 2012 (October). “Asserted Development: The Long Term Impact of Israeli’s Separation Barrier in the West Bank”, B’Tselem. Accessed October 15, 2014, http://www.btselem.org/sites/default/files2/201210_arrested_development_eng.pdf.Google Scholar
Hafez, Mohammed M., 2006. “Rationality, Culture, and Structure in the Making of Suicide Bombers: A Preliminary Theoretical Synthesis”, Studies In Conflict And Terrorism, 29 (2): 165-185.Google Scholar
Hammami, Rema and Tamari, Salim, 2001. “The Second Uprising: End or New Beginning?”, Journal of Palestine Studies, 30 (2): 5-25.Google Scholar
Hatuqa, Dalia, 2014. “Jerusalem Attacks Likely do not Portend a Third Palestinian Intifada”, Aljazeera (November 18), Accessed September 3, 2015, http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2014/11/18/why-talk-of-a-thirdpalestinianintifadaispremature.html.Google Scholar
Herzog, Michael, 2006 (March/April). “Can Hamas Be Tamed?” Foreign Affairs, Accessed August 2, 2015, https://www.foreignaffairs.org/articles/israel/2006-03-01/can-hamas-be-tamed.Google Scholar
Hroub, Khalid, 2004. “Hamas After Shaykh Yasinand Rantisi”, Journal of Palestine Studies, 33 (4): 21-38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johannsen, Margret, 2009. “From resistance to State Building: Dealing with The Ambiguities of the Hamas Takeover”, Security and Peace, 27 (3): 180-185.Google Scholar
Kapsit, Ben, 2002. “Jewish New Year 2002: The Second Anniversary of the Intifada”, Part I. Ma’ariv, September 6.Google Scholar
Kimhi, Shaul and Even, Shemuel, 2004. “Who Are the Palestinian Suicide Bombers?”, Terrorism and Political Violence, 16 (4): 815-840.Google Scholar
Kydd, Andrew and Walter, Barbara F., 2002. “Sabotaging the Peace: The Politics of Extremist Violence”, International Organization, 56 (2): 263-296.Google Scholar
Li, Darryl, 2006. “The Gaza Strip as Laboratory: Notes in the Wake of Disengagement”, Journal of Palestine Studies, 25 (2): 38-55.Google Scholar
Lyall, Jason, 2009. “Does Indiscriminate Violence Incite Insurgent Attacks? Evidence from Chechnya”, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 53 (3): 331-362.Google Scholar
Maoz, Zeev, 2009. Defending the Holy Land (Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press).Google Scholar
McGirk, Tim, 2009. “Rift Between Hamas and Fateh Grows After Gaza”, Time World, February 7. Accessed September 1, 2013, http://content.time.com/time/world/article/0, 8599, 1877640,00.html.Google Scholar
Moghadam, Assaf, 2006. “Suicide Terrorism, Occupation, and the Globalization of Martyrdom: A Critique of Dying to Win”, Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 29 (8): 707-729.Google Scholar
Pape, Robert, 2003. “The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism”, American Political Science Review, 97 (03): 343-361.Google Scholar
Pape, Robert, 2005. Dying to Win: The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism (New York, Random House).Google Scholar
Pape, Robert A. and Feldman, James K, 2010. Cutting the Fuse: The Explosion of Global Suicide Terrorism and How to Stop it (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Pearlman, Wendy, 2011. Violence, Nonviolence, and the Palestinian National Movement (New York, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Pehahzur, Ami, and Perliger, Arie, 2006. “The Changing Nature of Suicide Attacks: A Social Network Perspective”, Social Forces, 84 (4): 1987-2008.Google Scholar
Pedahzur, Ami, Perliger, Arie and Weinberg, Leonard, 2003. “Altruism and Fatalism: The Characteristics of Palestinian Suicide Terrorists”, Deviant Behavior, 24 (4): 405-423.Google Scholar
Pressman, Jeremy, 2003. “The Second Intifada: Background and Causes of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict”, Journal of Conflict Studies, 23 (2): 114-141.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert, 1988. “Diplomacy And Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games”, International Organization, 42 (3): 427-460.Google Scholar
Shamir, Jacob and Shikaki, Khalil, 2010. Palestinian and Israeli Public Opinion, The Public Imperative in the Second Intifada (Bloomington, Indiana University Press).Google Scholar
Shatz, Adam, 2011. “Is Palestine Next”, London Review of Books, 33 (14): 8-14.Google Scholar
Johannsen, Margret, 2009. “From resistance to State Building: Dealing with The Ambiguities of the Hamas Takeover”, Security and Peace, 27 (3): 180-185.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles, 1978. From Mobilization to Revolution (Reading Mass., Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.).Google Scholar
Usher, Graham, 2005a (March 24-30). “The Calm Before the Storm”, Al-Ahram Weekly, Accessed June 1, 2012, http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/Archive/2005/735/re1.htm.Google Scholar
Usher, Graham, 2005b (August 22). “The New Hamas”, Middle East Report Online, Accessed May 13, 2012, http://www.merip.org/mero/mero082105.html.Google Scholar
Usher, Graham, 2006. “The Democratic Resistance: Hamas, Fatah and the Palestinian Elections”, Journal of Palestine Studies, 25 (3): 20-36.Google Scholar
Wood, Elisabeth Jean, 2000. Forging Democracy from Below: Insurgent Transitions in South Africa and El Salvador (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar