Hostname: page-component-68945f75b7-gkscv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-05T17:23:46.715Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Frazer's magic wand of anthropology interpreting ‘The Golden Bough’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Geoffrey Wood
Get access

Extract

‘Who does not know Turner's picture of the Golden Bough ?’ asks Sir James Frazer at the beginning of his journey into the underworld of primitive magic and superstition called The Golden Bough. And indeed who does not know Frazer's work itself, if not in the full twelve volumes edition, then in the continually reprinted abridged version, or if not by academic reference then as a popular classic entrenched in modern culture?. This paper re-examines this text according to the presence of two discrepant readings of it. The investigation of this discrepancy makes use of the idea of ‘intertextuality’ according to which meanings of a text are located within the discursive traditions to which the text responds and within which it participates actively in the production of meanings. Superficially, The Golden Bough is easily perceived to occupy a place within a web of discourses: folklore, the history of religion, classical studies, social anthropology, as well as literary criticism and even literature itself. We are concerned here with social anthropology and literature/literary criticism, in terms of their uses and treatments of the work; also, significantly with the object discourse of the work.

Type
Soziologische Selbstbespiegelung
Information
European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , May 1982 , pp. 92 - 122
Copyright
Copyright © Archives Européenes de Sociology 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, R., Frazer on myth and ritual, Journal of the History of Ideas, XXXV (1975), 115–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atherton, J.S., The Books at the Wake (London, Faber, 1959).Google Scholar
Barthes, R., From work to text in Barthes, Image-Music-Text (London, Fontana Books, 1977).Google Scholar
Burrow, J.W., Evolution and Society (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1966).Google Scholar
Comte, A., Cours de philosophie positive (Paris, 1841), 5 vols.Google Scholar
Culler, J., Structuralist Poetics (Henley on Thames, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtius, E.R., European Literature in the Latin Middle Ages (Henley on Thames, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1953).Google Scholar
Douglas, M., Purity and Danger (Harmondsworth, Penguin Books, 1970).Google Scholar
Downie, R.A., James George Frazer: the portrait of a scholar (London, Watts, 1940).Google Scholar
Folklore review of The Golden Bough, XII (1901), 229–235.Google Scholar
Frazer, J.G., The Golden Bough (abridged edition: London, Macmillan, 1922).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frye, N., The archetypes of literature, in Vickery, (1966).Google Scholar
Gluckman, M., Order and Rebellion in Tribal Africa (London, Cohen and West, 1963).Google Scholar
Harris, M., The Rise of Anthropological Theory (Henley on Thames, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1968).Google Scholar
Hodgen, M., The Doctrine of Survivals (Cambridge, Allenson, 1936).Google Scholar
Hughes, H.S., Consciousness and Society (St. Albans, Paladin Books, 1974).Google Scholar
Hyman, S.E., The Tangled Bank (New York, Athenum, 1974).Google Scholar
Jarvie, I.C., The Revolution in Anthropology (Henley on Thames, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1964).Google Scholar
Kolakowski, L., Positivist Philosophy (Harmondsworth, Penguin Books, 1972).Google Scholar
Kristeva, J., Semiotike: recherches pour une semanalyse (Paris, Seuil, 1969).Google Scholar
Kristeva, J., The Semiotic Activity Screen, XIV (1973), 25–39.Google Scholar
Kuper, A., Anthropologists and Anthropology (London, Allen Lane, 1973).Google Scholar
Leach, , Ed., Golden Bough or Gilded Twig, Daedalus, LXXXX (1961), 371–387.Google Scholar
Leach, , Ed., Telstar ou les Aborigènes, Annales, XIX (1964), 1100–1124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, , Ed., Lévi-Strauss (London, Fontana Books, 1970).Google Scholar
Leach, , Ed., All that glitters is not gold, Times Higher Educational Supplement, 25. 02. 1977.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C., The Savage Mind (London, Weidenfield and Nicolson, 1966).Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C, The Raw and the Cooked Mythologiques I (London, Jonathan Cape, 1970).Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C., The Origin of Table Manners Mythologiques II (London, Jonathan Cape, 1978).Google Scholar
Lévy-Bruhl, L., The Philosophy of Auguste Comte (London, Swan Sonnenschein, 1903).Google Scholar
McCabe, C., James Joyce and the Revolution of the Word (London, Macmillan, 1978).Google Scholar
Man, Paul de, The Epistemology of Metaphor, in Sachs, S. (ed.), On Metaphor (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Manuel, F., The Eighteenth Century Confronts the Gods (Harvard, Harvard University Books, 1959).Google Scholar
Ryle, G., The Concept of Mind (Harmondsworth, Penguin Books, 1963).Google Scholar
Trilling, L., Beyond Culture (London, Martin Seeker and Warburg, 1966).Google Scholar
Tylor, E., Primitive Culture (London, John Murray, 1871), 2 vols.Google Scholar
Vickery, J.B., Myth and Literature (Lincoln, Nebraska, University of Nebraska Press, 1966).Google Scholar
Vickery, J.B., The Literary Impact of ‘The Golden Bough’ (New Jersey, Princeton University Press, 1973).Google Scholar
Wood, G.A., Theories of primitive mentality in social anthropology, Unpublished PHD thesis, University of London, 1980.Google Scholar