Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T21:40:49.286Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Twenty years of contrast: the French and British press during the inter-war period

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

Jean K. Chalaby
Jean K. Chalaby
Affiliation:
The London School of Economics and Political Science (London)
Get access

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to explain the causes of the contrast between the evolution of the French and British press presse franaise et britannique pendant l'entre-deux-guerres. during the inter-war period. The most visible sign of this difference was the commercial success of the British press and the stagnation of the French press. From a historical perspective, the most general factor was that market mechanism has a much more determining influence on the British rather than on the French press. While these decades were marked in Great Britain by a circulation war, competition was neutralised in France by the anti-competitive agreement reached among the leading Parisian newspapers. Market mechanisms also influenced the development of different patterns of newspaper ownership in the two nations. Stiff competition and a rational mode of newspaper ownership forced British journalists to develop journalistic practices and discursive strategies more commercially oriented than those of their French counterparts. These strategies, which constitute the primary cause of the commercial success of the British press, are illustrated by the phenomenon of depoliticisation.

Le propos est d'expliquer les causes du contrastc entre la commercial de la presse britannique et la stagnation de la presse franaise. Le facteur principal rside dans les mcanismes du march qui ont cu une influence bien plus dterminante sur la presse britannique que franaise. La comptition conomique a t intense parmi le monde journalistique britannique, alors qu'elle tait neutralise en France par l'accord de non-agression entre les principaux journaux parisiens. Le monde journalistique britannique a dvelopp des conglomrats de presse puissants l'chelle nationale, alors qu'en France on ne note pas d'equivalent. Une vive comptition et une conduite conomique rationelle de la part des propritaires ont forc les journalistes britanniques a developper des pratiques et des stratgies de prsentation beaucoup plus commerciales que celles des Franais. La dpolitisation de la presse britannique en est une manifestation frappante.

Le signe le plus visible de cette diffrence a t le succs Ziel dieser Abhandlung ist es, den Unterschied zwischen der Entwicklung des franzsischen und des englischen Pressewesens in der Zwischenkriegszeit aufzuzeigen. Das deutlichste Zeichen ihrer Verschiedenheit war der wirtschaftliche Erfolg der britischen und die Stagnation der franzsischen Presse. Aus historischer Sicht unterlag das englische Pressewesen viel strker den Zwngen der Wirtschaft als das franzsische. Whrend in Grobritannien jene Jahrzehnte unter dem Zeichen eines Auflagenkrieges standen, wurde in Frankreich der Wettkampf durch einen Anti-Konkurrenz-Pakt zwischen den fhrenden Pariscr Zeitungen neutralisiert. Aufgrund der Wirtschaftsstrukturen entstanden in beiden Lndern verschiedene Formen von Pressebesitz. Der harte Wettkampf und die rationelle Form des Pressebesitzes zwang britische Journalisten verstrkt dazu, ihre journalistische Arbeit wirtschaftlichen Gegebenheiten anzupassen, im Gegenzatz zu ihren franzsischen Kollengen. Eine Entpolitisierung der englischen Presse scheint die Folge zu sein.

Type
Actualité Européenne
Information
European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , May 1996 , pp. 143 - 159
Copyright
Copyright © Archives Européenes de Sociology 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Albert, P. et al. (1976), Documents pour l'histoire de la presse nationale aux XIXe et XXe siÈcles (Paris: CNRS).Google Scholar
Albert, P. (1983), La Presse française (Paris: La Documentation française).Google Scholar
Bellanger, C. et al. (eds) (1972), Histoire générale de la presse française, tome 3: de 1871 à 1940 (Paris: PUF).Google Scholar
Boussel, P. (1960), L'Affaire Dreyfus et la presse (Paris: Armand Colin).Google Scholar
Chisholm, A. and Davie, M. (1992), Beaver brook, A Life (London: Hutchinson).Google Scholar
Clarke, T. (1931), My Northcliffe Diary (London: Victor Gollancz).Google Scholar
Clarke, T., (1950), Northcliffe in History (London: Hutchinson).Google Scholar
Collet, C.D. (1933), History of the Taxes on Knowledge (London: Watts).Google Scholar
Collins, I. (1959), The Government and the Newspaper Press in France, 1814–1881 (London: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
A Conservative Journalist (1885), The Establishment of Newspapers, National Review, V, 818–828.Google Scholar
Gannon, F.R. (1971), The British Press and Germany, 1936–1939 (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Gardiner, A.G., Papers (London: British Library of Political and Economic Science).Google Scholar
Hollis, P. (1970), The Pauper Press (London: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Kitsikis, D. (1968), Les Rapports du Temps avec le gouvernement grec dans l'Entredeux-guerres, Revue d'Histoire Moderne et Contemporaine, XV, 512–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koss, S. (1990), The Rise and Fall of the Political Press In Britain (London: Fontana Press).Google Scholar
Kupferman, F. and Machefer, P. (1975), Presse et politique dans les années Trente: le cas du Petit Journal, Revue d'Histoire Moderne et Contemporaine, XXII, 7–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lansbury, G. (1925), The Miracle of Fleet Street (London: The Labour Publishing Company).Google Scholar
Manévy, R. (1945), Histoire de la presse, 1914–1939 (Paris: Corréa).Google Scholar
Mitchell, B.R. (1992), International Historical Statistics—Europe, 1750–1988 (New York: Stockton Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Brien, P. and Keyder, C. (1978), Economic Growth in Britain and France 1780–1914 (London: George Allen & Unwin).Google Scholar
The Office of The Times (1952), The History of The Times, 1912–1920 (London: The Office of The Times).Google Scholar
Palmer, M. (1983), Des petits journaux aux grandes agences. Naissance du joumalisme modeme (Paris: Aubier).Google Scholar
Royal Commission on the Press, (1949), Report, volume 20, cmnd. 7700 (London: H.M.S.O).Google Scholar
Steed, H.W. (1938), The Press (Harmondsworth: Penguin).Google Scholar
Wadsworth, A.P. (1955), Newspaper Circulations, 1800–1954 (Manchester: Manchester Statistical Society).Google Scholar
Weber, A.F. (1963), The Growth of Cities in the Nineteenth Century (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Weber, E. (1976), Peasants Into Frenchmen (Stanford: Stanford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiener, J.H. (1969), The War of the Unstamped (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Williams, F. (1957), Dangerous Estate (Cambridge: Patrick Stephens).Google Scholar