Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T07:26:44.420Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EU and US Regulatory Approaches to Information on Chemicals in Products: Implications for Consumers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Linda Molander  and
Alison K. Cohen
Linda Molander
Affiliation:
Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm
Alison K. Cohen
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Information dissemination across the supply chain to consumers about chemicals’ hazardous properties and presence in consumer products has been recognized as insufficient to improve to enable both producers and end-users to avoid hazardous chemicals and to manage risks to human health and the environment. A comparative analysis of the information requirements in four EU legislations (the CLP, the Cosmetics regulation, REACH, and the Toys Safety Directive) and three US legislations (California's Proposition 65 and Senate Bill 509, and the national TSCA) was conducted with the aim of studying to what extent existing regulatory information approaches require information to be disseminated to consumers. In general, the European legislations address and promote consumers’ access to information on chemicals in products more comprehensively than the American legislations, but the amount and type of information required to be disseminated to consumers varies widely. These differences include which chemicals are prioritised, if the chemical is used in a mixture or an article, what information dissemination strategies are used, and who is responsible for consumers accessing the information. It is recommended that chemical information policies should, at minimum, require chemical suppliers to inform consumers of hazardous chemicals present in their products and, if possible, recommend risk management measures to ensure a safe use of consumer products.

Type
Articles
Information
European Journal of Risk Regulation , Volume 3 , Issue 4 , December 2012 , pp. 521 - 533
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Cefic (The European Chemical Industry Council). “Summary of Cefi c Chemicals Trends Report”, August 2010, available on the Internet at <http://www.cefic.eu/Files/Publications/Cefic-Chemicals-Trends-Report-ShortSummary-Release-August2010FINAL(2).pdf> (last accessed on 29 October 2012).

2 American Chemistry Council (ACC), United States. “Industry fact sheet”, 2010, available on the Internet at <http://www.americanchemistry.com/s_acc/bin.asp?CID=1772&DID=6573&DOC=FILE.pdf> (last accessed on 28 October 2012).

3 European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), Helsinki, Finland, “List of pre-registered substances”, 23 September 2010, available on the Internet at <http://apps.echa.europa.eu/preregistered/pre-registeredsub.aspx> (last accessed on 28 October 2012).

4 Wilson, Michael P., Chia, Daniel A., Ehlers, Bryan C.. “Green Chemistry in California: A Framework for Leadership in Chemicals Policy and Innovation”. Special Report to the California Senate Environmental Quality Committee and the Assembly Committee on Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials (Berkeley, CA: California Policy Research Center, UC Office of the President, 2006), pp. 1 et sqq., at p. 11.Google ScholarPubMed

5 Safer Chemicals, Healthy Families, “What is TSCA”, 2009, available on the Internet at <http://www.saferchemicals.org/resources/tsca.html> (last accessed on 28 October 2012).

6 Massey, Rachel I., Hutchins, Janet G., Becker, Monica, Tickner, Joel, “Toxic Substances in Articles: The Need for Information” (Copenhagen: The Nordic Council of Ministers, 2008), TemaNord 2008:596, pp. 1 et sqq., at p. 10.Google Scholar

7 Yang, Chun Z., Yaniger, Stuart I., Jordan, Craig, Klein, Daniel J., Bittner, George D.. “Most Plastic Products Release Estrogenic Chemicals: A Potential Health Problem That Can Be Solved”, 119(7) Environ Health Perspect (2011), pp. 989 et sqq., at p. 995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, United States, “Fourth National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals”, 2011, available on the Internet at <http://www.cdc.gov/exposurereport/> (last accessed on 28 October 2012).

9 Woodruff, Tracey J., Zota, Ami R., Schwartz, Jackie M.. “Environmental Chemicals in Pregnant Women in the US: NHANES 2003–2004”, 119 Environ Health Perspect (2011), pp. 878 et sqq., at p. 881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10 Schwarzman, Megan R., Wilson, Michael P.. “New science for chemicals policy,” 326 Science (2009), pp. 1065 et sqq., at p. 1066.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

11 Ekblom, Petra, Johansson, Anne-Marie, Snöbohm, Christina et al., “Kemikalier i varor – Strategier och styrmedel för att minska riskerna med farliga ämnen i vardagen” (Chemicals in articles Strategies and instruments for bringing about reduced risks with hazardous substances in articles) No. 3/11, (Sundbyberg: The Swedish Chemicals Agency, 2011), at p. 13.Google Scholar

12 Regulation (EC) 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006: the Registration, Evaluation, Authorization, and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/ EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/ EC and 2000/21/EC, OJ 2006 L396/1.

13 Linda Molander and Christina Rudén, “Narrow-and-sharp or broadand- blunt Regulations of hazardous chemicals in consumer products in the European Union”, DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2011.11.003> (last accessed on 28 October 2012) Reg Toxicol Pharmacol (2011).

14 Vogel, Sara A., “The Politics of Plastics: The Making and Unmaking of Bisphenol A ‘Safety”, 99(S3) American Journal of Public Health, pp. S559 et sqq., at p. S560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

15 European Commission (EC), Communication from the Commission – SG(2012) D/5564. Title: Notice banning the import and sale of products intended for indoor use which contain the phthalates DEHP, DBP, BBP, and DIPB, and products which contain these substances in parts of the products which may come into contact with skin or mucous membranes, 2012, available on the Internet at <http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/tris/pisa/app/search/index.cfm?fuseaction=pisa_notif_overview&iYear=2012&inum=124&lang=EN> (last accessed on 28 October 2012).

16 UK Royal Commission on Environment and Pollution, Chemicals in Products: Safeguarding the Environment and Human Health. (London, Stationary Office Books, 2003), pp. 1 et sqq., at p. 1.Google Scholar

17 Strategic Approach to International Chemicals Management (SAICM), “International Conference on Chemicals Management, Second session, Background information in relation to the emerging policy issue of chemicals in products”, 11–15 May 2009, available on the Internet at <http://www.saicm.org/documents/iccm/ICCM2/meeting%20documents/ICCM2%20INF35%20products%20background.pdf> (last accessed on 28 October 2012).

18 Strategic Approach to International Chemicals Management (SAICM), “SAICM Information bulletin No I”, 2008, available on the Internet at <http://www.saicm.org/documents/Publications/SAICM%20Information%20Bulletin%20No%201%20Jan%20 2008.pdf> (last accessed on 28 October 2012).

19 Strategic Approach to International Chemicals Management (SAICM), Draft overarching policy strategy, SAICM/ICCM.1/3, (Dubai: 2006), at p. 8.

20 Babajide Alo, “Summary Report of the Informal Workshop on Stakeholders’ Information Needs on Chemicals in Articles/Products”, presentation held at the International Conference on Chemicals Management 2 (ICCM-2) side event on Chemicals in articles, Geneva, Switzerland, May 12 2009, available on the Internet at <http://www.chem.unep.ch/unepsaicm/cheminprod_dec08/default.htm> (last accessed on 28 October 2012).

21 Consumers International, Consumer Rights, 2012, available on the Internet at <http://www.consumersinternational.org/who-we-are/consumer-rights> (last accessed on 28 October 2012).

22 Tickner, Joel A., Geiser, Ken, Coffin, Melissa. “The U.S. experience in promoting sustainable chemistry”, 12(2) Environ Sci Pollut Res (2005), pp. 115 et sqq., at p. 115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

23 Wilson, Michael P., Schwarzman, Megan R.. “Toward a new U.S. chemicals policy: Rebuilding the foundation to advance new science, green chemistry, and environmental health”, 117 Environ Health Perspect (2009), pp. 1202 et sqq., at p. 1205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

24 Molander and Rudén. “Narrow-and-sharp or broad-and-blunt – Regulations of hazardous chemicals in consumer products in the European Union”, DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2011.11.003> (last accessed on 28 October 2012).

25 Cohen, Alison K.. “The implementation of REACH: initial perspectives from government, industry, and civil society”, 17(1) Int J Occup Environ Health (2011), pp. 57 et sqq., at p. 61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

26 Wilson and Schwarzman, “Toward a new U.S. chemicals policy”, at p. 1202.

27 Koch, Lars and Ashford, Nicholas A.. “Rethinking the role of information in chemicals policy: implications for TSCA and REACH”, 14 J Clean Prod (2006), pp. 31 et sqq.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

28 Tickner et al., “The U.S. experience in promoting sustainable chemistry”, p. 115.

29 Molander and Rudén, “Narrow-and-sharp or broad-and-blunt – Regulations of hazardous chemicals in consumer products in the European Union”, DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2011.11.003> (last accessed on 28 October 2012).

30 For example: Beronius, Anna, Rudén, Christina, Hanberg, Annika, Håkansson, Helen. “Health risk assessment procedures for endocrine disrupting compounds within different regulatory frameworks in the European Union”, 55(2) Reg Toxicol Pharmacol (2009), pp. 111 et sqq.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

31 Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008 on classification, labeling and packaging of substances and mixtures, amending and repealing Directives 67/548/EEC and 1999/45/EC, and amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH). OJ 2008 L 353/1.

32 United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, “About the GHS”, 2011, available on the Internet at <http://www.unece.org/trans/danger/publi/ghs/ghs_welcome_e.html> (last accessed on 28 October 2012).

33 United States Environmental Protection Agency, “GHS Implementation by Other United States Agencies”, 2011, available on the Internet at <http://www.epa.gov/oppfead1/international/ghs/otheragencies.htm> (last accessed on 28 October 2012).

34 Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and the Council of 30 November 2009 on cosmetic products. OJ 2009 L 342/59.

35 Regulation (EC) 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006: the Registration, Evaluation, Authorization, and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/ EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/ EC and 2000/21/EC, OJ 2006 L396/1.

36 European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), Helsinki, Finland, “Candidate List table”, 18 June 2012, available on the Internet at <http://echa.europa.eu/web/guest/candidate-list-table> (last accessed on 28 October 2012).

37 Directive 2009/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2009 on the safety of toys, OJ 2009 L170/1.

38 The Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986. California Ballot Initiative Proposition 65 (1986).

39 Senate Bill No. 509. California State Senate (2008).

40 Toxic Substances Control Act (Public Law 94–469), 15 U.S.C. §2601–2692 (1976).

41 Rudén, Christina and Hansson, Sven Ove, “Registration, Evaluation, and Authorization of Chemicals (REACH) is but the first step – how far will it take us? Six further steps to improve the European chemicals legislation”, 118(1) Environ Health Perspect (2010), pp. 6 et sqq., at p. 9.Google ScholarPubMed

42 Tickner et al., “The U.S. experience in promoting sustainable chemistry”, p. 116.

43 Ökopol – GmbH Institut für Ökologie und Politik (No authors stated. Ökopol responsible for carrying out the project), “REACH Trigger for Information on Substances of Very High Concern (SVHC) – An Assessment of the 0.1 % Limit in Articles” (Copenhagen, Nordic Councils of Ministers, 2010), TemaNord 2010:514, pp. 1 et sqq., at p. 10.

44 Beatrice Kogg and Åke Thidell, “Chemicals in Products – An overview of systems for providing information regarding chemicals in products and of stakeholders’ needs for such information”, 2010, United Nations Environment Programme, available on the Internet at <http://www.chem.unep.ch/unepsaicm/cip/Documents/Kogg_Thidell_CiP%20report_final.pdf> (last accessed on 28 October 2012).

45 Christian Schaible and Elise Bonneau, “The Fight to Know? Substances of Very High Concern and The Citizens’ Right to Know Under REACH”, 2010, European Environmental Bureau, available on the Internet at <http://www.eeb.org/EEB/index.cfm/news-events/news/big-retailers-caught-breaching-eu-chemicals-law/> (last accessed on 28 October 2012).

46 Cohen, “The implementation of REACH: Initial perspectives from government, industry, and civil society”, at p. 62.

47 European Commission, “Workshop on Competitiveness, Innovation and REACH, 6 December 2011, Brussels”, 2012, available at the Internet at: <http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/sectors/chemicals/reach/events/#h2–2> (last accessed on 28 October 2012).

48 International Chemical Secretariat (ChemSec), “European Commission evaluates how REACH affects European Industry”, 2012, available at the Internet at: <http://chemsec.org/news/news-2012/868-european-commission-evaluates-how-reach-affects- european-industry> (last accessed on 28 October 2012).

49 McCallum, David B., Hammond, Sharon Lee, Covello, Vincent T., “Communicating about environmental risks: How the public uses and perceives information sources”, 18(3) Health Education and Behavior (1991) pp. 349 et sqq., at p. 349.Google ScholarPubMed

50 Adams, Crystal, Brown, Phil, Morello-Frosch, Rachel, Brody, Julia Green, Rudel, Ruthann, Zota, Ami, Dunagan, Sarah, Tovar, Jessica, Patton, Sharyle, “Disentangling the exposure experience: The roles of community context and report-back of environmental exposure data”, 52(2) Journal of Health and Social Behavior (2011) pp. 180 et sqq., at p. 185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

51 Lyndon, Mary L., “Information economics and chemical toxicity: designing laws to produce and use data”, 87(7) Michigan Law Review (1989) pp. 1795 et sqq., at p. 1798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

52 Kane, Agnes B. and Hurt RH, Robert H., “Nanotoxicology: The asbestos analogy revisited”, 3(7) Nature Nanotech (2008), pp. 378 et sqq., at p. 379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

53 Katarzyna Malkiewicz, Michala Pettitt, Kenneth A. Dawson, Arho Toikka, Sven Ove Hansson, Janne Hukkinen, Iseult Lynch, Jamie Lead. “Nanomaterials in REACH – project report” (15 August 2011), available on the Internet at <http://www.naturvardsverket.se/sv/Start/Forskning/Nyheter/Rad-om-nanomaterial-i-REACH/> (last accessed on 28 October 2012).

54 Rudén and Hansson, “REACH is but the first step”, supra note 41, at p. 9.

55 Hansson, Sven Ove, Molander, Linda, Rudén, Christina, “The substitution principle”, 59 Reg Toxicol Pharmacol, (2011), pp. 454 et sqq., at p. 459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

56 Brody, Julia G., Morello-Frosch, Rachel, Brown, Phil, Rudel, Ruthann A., Altman, Rebecca G., Frye, Margaret, Osimo, Cheryl A., Pérez, Carla, Seryak, Liesel M., “ ‘Is it safe?’: New ethics for reporting personal exposures to environmental chemicals”, 97(9) Am J Public Health (2007), pp. 1547 et sqq., at p. 1548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

57 Verbeke, Wim, Frewer, Lynn J., Scholderer, Joachim, De Brabander, Hubert F., “Why consumers behave as they do with respect to food safety and risk information”, 586 Analytica Chimica Acta (2007), pp. 2 et sqq.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

58 Heslop, Louise A., “If we label it, will they care? The effect of GMingredient labelling on consumer responses”, 29 J Consum Policy (2006), pp. 1 et sqq. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

59 Pratt, Iona S., “Global harmonisation of classification and labelling of hazardous chemicals”, 128 Toxicol Lett, (2002), pp. 5 et sqq.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

60 Cohen, interview data, 2009.