Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T19:42:43.661Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Science, Scientist and Judges: Can Judges try Science?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Alfredo Fioritto*
Affiliation:
Department of Law, University of Pisa, Italy, alfredo.fioritto@unipi.it

Abstract

Case n. 380, 22.10.2012, Victims of the earthquake v. Barberi et al., (members of the NationalCommission for the Prediction and Prevention of Major Risks),Tribunal of L'Aquila, grounds delivered on 29.01.2013; (first degree of judgment).

Articles 113, 589, c.1and 3, 590 Criminal Code (113 – Cooperation in negligent homicide, 589 – Negligent homicide, 590 – Negligent personal injury)

The Tribunal of L’Aquila condemned seven members of the National Commission for the Prediction and Prevention of Major Risks to six years in prison for manslaughter because they dismissed the role of scientists in a March 31, 2009 meeting. The meeting was convoked in L’Aquila to provide the population of L'Aquila, which was scared after a continuous series of tremors lasting three months, with serious information on a scientific base. On the contrary, the members of the Commission supported a press campaign launched by the Chief of the National Civil Protection to reassure the population. Five days after the meeting, a serious tremor took place causing more than 300 deaths.

Type
Symposium on the L'Aquila Seven: Re-Establishing Justice After a Natural Disaster
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)