Article contents
Response to the Findings of Eurochambres 2013 SME Test Benchmark
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 January 2017
Abstract
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS1867299X00003664/resource/name/firstPage-S1867299X00003664a.jpg)
- Type
- Reports
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014
References
1 Eurochambres, SME Test Benchmark 2013 (Brussels, 2013), at p. 6.Google Scholar
2 http://ec.europa.eu/smart-regulation/impact/commission_guidelines/commission_guidelines_en.htm (last accessed on 9 May 2014).
3 http://ec.europa.eu/smart-regulation/impact/key_docs/docs/meg_guidelines.pdf (last accessed on 9 May 2014).
4 Ibid., p. 11.
5 Ibid., p. 10.
6 On impact assessment, SMEs, quantity vs. quality of consultation and related “fatigue” see for instance: House of Lords Session 2009–10, European Union Committee Publications, European Union Committee – Fourth Report, Impact Assessments in the EU: room for improvement?, Evidence section, at p. 4.
7 http://www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/2012recommendation.htm (last accessed on 9 May 2014).
8 Ibid., p. 8.
9 Ibid., p. 11.
10 Barriers and best practices in SME test implementation – PE464.437
- 1
- Cited by