Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

What is ‘European Archaeology’? What Should it be?

  • Staša Babić (a1), Raimund Karl (a2), Monika Milosavljević (a1), Koji Mizoguchi (a3), Carsten Paludan-Müller (a4), Tim Murray (a5), John Robb (a6), Nathan Schlanger (a7) and Alessandro Vanzetti (a8)...

Abstract

‘European archaeology’ is an ambiguous and contested rubric. Rooted in the political histories of European archaeology, it potentially unites an academic field and provides a basis for international collaboration and inclusion, but also creates essentialized identities and exclusionary discourses. This discussion article presents a range of views on what European archaeology is, where it comes from, and what it could be.

«L'archéologie européenne» est une notion ambiguë et contestée. Avec ses racines dans l'histoire politique de l'archéologie en Europe, elle est capable d'unifier les branches de la discipline et d’établir les bases d'une collaboration et d'une intégration au niveau international mais elle est aussi à l'origine de la création d'identités unidimensionnelles et de propos exclusionistes. Le débat que nous amorçons ici présente une série de points de vue sur ce que l'archéologie européenne représente, d'où elle provient et ce qu'elle pourrait devenir. Translation by Madeleine Hummler

Der Ausdruck „Europäische Archäologie“ ist ein mehrdeutiger und bestrittener Begriff. Mit ihren Wurzeln in der politischen Geschichte der Archäologie in Europa ist die Disziplin in der Lage, das wissenschaftliche Fach zu vereinigen und die Grundlagen einer internationaler Zusammenarbeit und Eingliederung zu legen, aber es besteht auch immer die Gefahr, dass sie auch zur Erzeugung von übermäßig vereinfachten Identitäten und zur Förderung von ausschließender Diskurse leiten kann. Die vorliegenden Beiträge legen ein breites Meinungsspektrum über die Bedeutung, den Ursprung und die Zukunft der europäischen Archäologie vor. Translation by Madeleine Hummler

Copyright

References

Hide All
Babeş, M. & Kaeser, M-A. 2009. Archaeologists without Boundaries: Towards a History of International Archaeological Congresses (1866–2006). Oxford: Archaeopress.
Babić, S. 2002. ‘Still innocent after all these years?’ Sketches for a Social History of Archaeology in Serbia. In: Biehl, P.F., Gramsch, A. & Marciniak, A., eds. Archäologien Europas: Geschichte, Methoden und Theorien/Archaeologies of Europe: History, Methods and Theories. Tübinger Archäologische Taschenbücher 3. Münster: Waxmann, pp. 309–22.
Babić, S. 2014. Identity, Integration and Power Relations in the Study of the Iron Age. In: Stoddard, S. & Popa, C., eds. Fingerprinting the Iron Age: Integrating South-Eastern Europe into the Debate. Oxford: Oxbow, pp. 295302.
Babić, S. 2015. Theory in Archaeology. In: Wright, J.D., ed. International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edition, Vol 1. Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 899904.
Baram, U. & Carroll, L. 2000. A Historical Archaeology of the Ottoman Empire: Breaking New Ground. New York: Kluwer Academic, Plenum Publishers.
Borić, D. 2011. Adaptations and Transformations of the Danube Gorges Foragers (c. 13,000–5500 BC): An Overview. In: Krauß, R., ed. Beginnings: New Research in the Appearance of the Neolithic Between Northwest Anatolia and the Carpathian Basin. Rahden/Westfalen: Marie Leidorf, pp. 157203.
Brather, S. 2008. Virchow and Kossinna: From the Science-Based Anthropology of Humankind to the Culture-Historical Archaeology of Peoples. In: Schlanger, N. & Nordbladh, J., eds. Archives, Ancestors, Practices: Archaeology in the Light of its History. New York: Berghahn Books, pp. 317–34.
Broodbank, C. 2013. The Making of the Middle Sea: A History of the Mediterranean from the Beginning to the Emergence of the Classical World. London & New York: Thames & Hudson.
Chakrabarti, D.K. 1997. Colonial lndology: Sociopolitics of the Ancient lndian Past. New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal Pvt.
Chapman, R.W. 2003. Archaeologies of Complexity. London: Routledge.
Childe, V.G. 1958. The Prehistory of European Society. London: Pelican.
Coles, J.M. & Harding, A.F. 1979. The Bronze Age in Europe: An Introduction to the Prehistory of Europe c. 2000–700 BC. London: Methuen.
Conard, N.J. 2008. A Critical View of the Evidence for a Southern African Origin of Behavioural Modernity. South African Archaeological Society Goodwin Series, 10: 175–79.
Conard, N.J. 2011. The Demise of the Neanderthal Cultural Niche and the Beginning of the Upper Palaeolithic in Southwestern Germany. In: Conard, N.J. & Richter, J., eds. Neanderthal Lifeways, Subsistence and Technology. London: Springer, pp. 223–40.
Connah, G. 2010. Writing about Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Connah, G. 2013. Archaeological Practice in Africa: A Historical Perspective. In: Mitchell, P. & Lane, P.J., eds. The Oxford Handbook of African Archaeology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1533.
Demoule, J-P. 2010. The Crisis: Economic, Ideological and Archaeological. In: Schlanger, N. & Aitchison, K., eds. Archaeology and the Global Crisis: Multiple Impacts, Possible Solutions. Tervuren: Culture Lab Éditions, pp. 1317.
Diamond, J. 1997. Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies. New York: W.W. Norton and Co.
Díaz-Andreu, M. 2007. A World History of Nineteenth-Century Archaeology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Flannery, K.V. & Marcus, J. 2011. A New World Perspective on the ‘Death’ of Archaeological Theory. In: Bintliff, J. & Pearce, M., eds. The Death of Archaeological Theory. Oxford: Oxbow, pp. 2330.
Gaddis, J.L. 2002. The Landscape of History: How Historians Map the Past. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gattiglia, G. 2014. Think Big about Data: Archaeology and the Big Data Challenge. University of Pisa – MAPPA Lab. Paper presented during the EAA 2014 session ‘Barriers and Opportunities: Open Access and Open Data in Archaeology’. [online] [accessed 10 December 2015]. Available at: http://www.ariadne-infrastructure.eu/ita/Media/Files/EAA2014_OpenAccess_session_13_Gabriele.Gattiglia_MAPPA_13092014
Giddens, A. 1990. The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity.
González-Ruibal, A. 2010. Colonialism and European Archaeology. In: Lydon, J. & Rizvi, U., eds. Handbook of Postcolonial Archaeology. Walnut Creek (CA): Left Coast Press, pp. 3747.
González-Ruibal, A. 2014. Archaeological Revolution(s). Current Swedish Archaeology, 22: 4145.
Gramsch, A. 2000. Reflexiveness in Archaeology, Nationalism, and Europeanism. Archaeological Dialogues, 7: 419.
Gramsch, A. 2011. Theory in Central European Archaeology: Dead or Alive? In: Bintliff, J. & Pearce, M., eds. The Death of Archaeological Theory. Oxford: Oxbow, pp. 4871.
Graves-Brown, P., Jones, S. & Gamble, C. eds. 1996. Cultural Identity and Archaeology: The Construction of European Communities. London & New York: Routledge.
Guidi, A. 1996. Nationalism without a Nation: The Italian Case. In: Champion, T. & Díaz-Andreu, M., eds. Nationalism and Archaeology in Europe. London: UCL Press, pp. 108–18.
Guilaine, J. 2015. The Neolithization of Mediterranean Europe: Mobility and Interactions from the Near East to the Iberian Peninsula. In: Fowler, C., Harding, J. & Hofmann, D., eds. The Oxford Handbook of Neolithic Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 8198.
Guldi, J. & Armitage, D. 2014. The History Manifesto. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hardt, M. & Negri, A. 2000. Empire. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
Hølleland, H. 2010. Spells of History: Childe's Contribution to the European Identity Discourse. Bulletin of the History of Archaeology, 20: 3037.
Humphreys, S.C. 2002. Classics and Colonialism: Towards an Erotics of the Discipline. In: Most, G. W., ed. Disciplining Classics. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, pp. 207–51.
Karl, R. 2014. Holy Cow! Hawks, Wolves, Sheep and the Archaeological Animal Farm. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 42: 14.
Kohl, P.L. & Fawcett, C. eds. 1995. Nationalism, Politics, and the Practice of Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kristiansen, K. 2008. Do we Need the ‘Archaeology of Europe’? Archaeological Dialogues, 15: 525.
Kristiansen, K. 2009. Contract Archaeology in Europe: An Experiment in Diversity. World Archaeology, 41: 641–48.
Kristiansen, K. 2014. Towards a New Paradigm? The Third Science Revolution and its Possible Consequences in Archaeology. Current Swedish Archaeology, 22: 1134.
Kristiansen, K. & Larsson, T. 2005. The Rise of Bronze Age Society: Travels, Transmissions and Transformations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Legendre, J-P, Olivier, L. & Schnitzler, B. 2007. L'archéologie nazie en Europe de l'Ouest. (trilingual edition, French, German, English, with summaries in the other two languages). Gollion: Infolio.
Liverani, M. 2013. The Ancient Near East: History, Society and Economy. London & New York: Routledge.
Mizoguchi, K. 2006. Archaeology, Society and Identity in Modern Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mizoguchi, K. 2015. A Future of Archaeology. Antiquity, 89: 1222.
Murray, T. 1996. From Sydney to Sarajevo: A Centenary Reflection on Archaeology and European Identity. Archaeological Dialogues, 3: 5569.
Niklasson, E. 2014. Shutting the Stable Door after the Horse has Bolted. Critical Thinking and the Third Science Revolution. Current Swedish Archaeology, 22: 5763.
Novaković, P. 2012. The ‘German School’ and its Influence on the National Archaeologies of the Western Balkans. In: Migotti, B., Mason, P., Nadbath, B. & Mulh, T., eds. Scripta in Honorem Bojan Đurić. Monografije Centra za preventivno arheologijo 1. Ljubljana: Zavod za varstvo kulturne dediščine, pp. 5171.
Olivier, L. & Coudart, A. 1995. French Tradition and the Central Place of History in the Human Sciences: Preamble to a Dialogue between Robinson Crusoe and his Man Friday. In: Ucko, P.J., ed. Theory in Archaeology: A World Perspective. London: Routledge, pp. 363–81.
Ortman, S.G., Cabaniss, A.H.F., Sturm, J.O. & Bettencourt, L.M.A. 2014. The Pre-History of Urban Scaling. [online] [accessed 10 December 2015]. Available at: http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0087902
Paludan-Müller, C. 2008. The Need for an Archaeology of Europe: Reasons and Perspectives. Archaeological Dialogues, 15: 4851.
Paludan-Müller, C. 2009. Europe – A Constrained and Fragmented Space on the Edge of the Continental Landmasses: Crossroad, Battlefield and Melting Pot. In: Heritage and Beyond. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, pp. 7583.
Paludan-Müller, C. 2013a. On Rivers, Mountains, Seas and Ideas: Or What Vast Spaces and Long Lines Mean to Culture and History. In: Bergerbrant, S. & Sabatini, S., eds. Counterpoint: Essays in Archaeology and Heritage Studies in Honour of Professor Kristian Kristiansen. British Archaeological Reports International Series 2508. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 617–22.
Paludan-Müller, C. 2013b. Caring About the Past Requires Care for the Present. In: Lagerlöf, A., ed. ‘Who Cares?’ Perspectives on Public Awareness, Participation and Protection in Archaeological Heritage Management. EAC Occasional Paper 8. Namur: Europae Archaeologia Consilium, pp. 8791.
Popper, K.R. 1980. Die offene Gesellschaft und ihre Feinde II. Falsche Propheten. 6. Aufl. München: Francke.
Raczkowski, W. 2011. The ‘German School of Archaeology’ in its Central European Context: Sinful Thoughts. In: Gramsch, A. & Sommer, U., eds. A History of Central European Archaeology: Theory, Methods, and Politics. Budapest: Archaeolingua, pp. 197214.
Renfrew, C. 1976. Megaliths, Territories and Populations. In: de Laet, S., ed. Acculturation and Continuity in Atlantic Europe. Brugge: De Tempel, pp. 198220.
Renfrew, C. 1994. The Identity of Europe in Prehistoric Archaeology. Journal of European Archaeology, 2: 153–73.
Rowlands, M. 1994. Why Do We Need a European Association of Archaeologists? Journal of European Archaeology, 2: 175–78.
Rowley-Conwy, P. 2007. From Genesis to Prehistory: The Archaeological Three Age System and its Contested Reception in Denmark, Britain and Ireland. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Said, E.W. 1978. Orientalism. New York: Pantheon Books.
Schlanger, N. 2010. Postscript: On Dead Canaries, Guinea-Pigs and other Trojan Horses. In: Schlanger, N. & Aitchison, K., eds. Archaeology and the Global Crisis: Multiple Impacts, Possible Solutions. Tervuren: Culture Lab Éditions, pp. 107–15.
Settis, S. 2006. The Future of the ‘Classical’. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Sklenár, K. 1983. Archaeology in Central Europe: The First 500 Years. New York: St Martin's Press / Leicester: Leicester University Press.
Stoczkowski, W. 2008. How to Benefit from Received Ideas. In: Murray, T. & Evans, C., eds. Histories of Archaeology: A Reader in the History of Archaeology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 346–59.
Tarlow, S. & Gramsch, A. 2008. Editorial: Does the ‘Archaeology of Europe’ Exist? An Archaeological Dialogue. Archaeological Dialogues, 15: 169.
Thorpe, N. 2015. Northern and Western Europe. In: Fowler, C., Harding, J. & Hofmann, D., eds. The Oxford Handbook of Neolithic Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 215–34.
Todorova, M. 1997. Imagining the Balkans. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
van der Linde, S.J., van den Dries, M.H., Schlanger, N. & Slappendel, C.G. eds. 2013. European Archaeology Abroad. Global Settings, Comparative Perspectives. Leiden: Sidestone Press.
Veit, U. 2002. From Nationalism to Nazism: Gustaf Kossinna and his Concept of a National Archaeology. In: Härke, H., ed. Archaeology, Ideology and Society: The German Experience (second edition). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 4166.
Vidale, M. 2000. ‘Colonial Indology’, a Review of the Book by D.K. Chakrabarti (Dehli 1997). East and West, 50: 588–96.
Voss, B. 2015. What's New? Rethinking Ethnogenesis in the Archaeology of Colonialism. American Antiquity, 80: 655–70.
Walker, B. 2014. Ottoman Archaeology: Localising the Imperial. In: Smith, C., ed. Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology. New York: Springer, pp. 5642–64.
Wallerstein, I. 1974. The Rise and Future Demise of the World Capitalist System: Concepts for Comparative Analysis. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 16: 384415.
Watkins, J. & Nicholas, G.P. 2014. Indigenous Archaeologies: North American Perspective. In: Smith, C., ed. Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology. New York: Springer, pp. 3794–803.

Keywords

What is ‘European Archaeology’? What Should it be?

  • Staša Babić (a1), Raimund Karl (a2), Monika Milosavljević (a1), Koji Mizoguchi (a3), Carsten Paludan-Müller (a4), Tim Murray (a5), John Robb (a6), Nathan Schlanger (a7) and Alessandro Vanzetti (a8)...

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed