Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T15:02:57.169Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fashioning Identities, Forging Inequalities: Late Neolithic/Copper Age Personal Ornaments of the Portuguese Estremadura

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

Jonathan T. Thomas
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

From an analysis of over 3,000 beads and pendants from seven contemporary Late Neolithic/Copper Age (3500–2500 BC) sites in the Portuguese Estremadura, two dominant patterns emerge: (1) most beads show a high degree of standardization in terms of size and shape and are made from local materials; and (2) a minority are made from non-local, rare, and visually distinctive materials (e.g.variscite, ivory), and are less standardized and more labour-intensive. The emphasis on a wide-range of materials suggests that uncommon ornaments may have functioned as ‘value added' materials with special significance, enhancing potential design combinations. Material preferences for beads, bracelets, pendants, plaques, and ground stone tools (da Veiga Ferreira 1951; Lillios 1997, 2008) appear to mirror other Western Mediterranean raw material preferences for ornaments and other polished stone objects (Goñi Quinteiro et al. 1999; Harrison and Orozco Köhler 2001; Pascual Benito 1998; Skeates 2010; Teruel Berbell 1986) suggesting that the Estremadura participated in aspects of a wider system of shared symbolic values.

L'analyse de plus de 3000 perles et pendentifs provenant de sept sites contemporains du Néolithique récent/Âge du Cuivre (3500–2500 BC) de l'Estremadura portugais a permis de définir deux modèles dominants: (1) la plupart des perles présentent un degré élevé de standardisation quant à leur taille et forme et sont confectionnées à partir de matériaux locaux; (2) une minorité est faite de matériaux non locaux, rares et visuellement distinctifs (comme la variscite, l'ivoire); ces perles sont moins standardisées et nécessitent plus de travail à leur fabrication. L'importance accordée à la grande variété de matériaux semble indiquer que les ornements extraordinaires avaient peut-être la fonction de matériel à « valeur ajoutée » avec une signification spéciale, mettant en valeur de possibles combinaisons de designs. La préférence matérielle pour perles, bracelets, pendentifs, plaques et outils en pierre polie (da Veiga Ferreira 1951; Lillios 1997, 2008) semble refléter des préférences en matériaux bruts de l'ouest méditerranéen pour les ornements et objets en pierre polie (Goñi Quinteiro et al. 1999; Harrison et Orozco Köhler 2001; Pascual Benito 1998; Skeates 2010; Teruel Berbell 1986) et suggère que l'Estremadura faisait sous certains aspects partie d'un système plus étendu de valeurs symboliques partagées. Translation by Isabelle Gerges.

Zusammenfassung

Zusammenfassung

In einer Analyse von 3000 Perlen und Anhängern aus sieben endneolithischen/ kupferzeitlichen (3500–2500 v. Chr.) Fundplätzen der portugiesischen Estremadura zeichnen sich zwei grundlegende Muster ab: (1) die meisten Perlen sind aus lokalen Materialien gefertigt und zeigen einen hohen Grad an Standardisierung, d. h. in Bezug auf Größe und Form; und (2) ein geringerer Teil an Perlen wurde hingegen aus nicht lokalen, seltenen und visuell herausragenden Materialien (z. B. Variszit, Elfenbein) in einer weniger standardisierten und arbeitsintensiven Form hergestellt. Die Betonung in der Verwendung einer großen Anzahl verschiedener Materialien suggeriert, dass seltene Schmuckstücke möglicherweise elaborierte ‘value-added' Objektemit besonderer Bedeutung darstellen, die die Zahl an möglichen Designkombinationen erhöhte. Die Wahl an Werkstoffen für Perlen, Armreifen, Anhänger, Zierplatten und Felsgeräte (da Veiga Ferreira 1951; Lillios 1997, 2008) scheint andere westmediterrane Rohmaterialpräferenzen für Schmuck und andere polierte Steinobjekte widerzuspiegeln (Goñi Quinteiro et al. 1999; Harrison and Orozco Köhler 2001; Pascual Benito 1998; Skeates 2010; Teruel Berbell 1986), was darauf hinweist, dass die Estremadura zu einem gewissen Maß an einem weiträumigen System von gemeinsamen Symbolwerten partizipierte. Translation by Roland Gauss.

Keywords

beadspersonal ornamentspolished stonecraft productionIberiaLate Neolithic/ Copper Ageperlesornements personnelspierre polieproduction artisanaleIbérieNéolithique récent/Âge du CuivrePerlenZierratgeschliffener SteinHandwerksproduktionIberische HalbinselSpätneolithikum/Kupferzeit
Type
Articles
Information
European Journal of Archaeology , Volume 14 , Issue 1-2 , 2011 , pp. 29 - 59
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 Maney Publishing 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ames, K., 1995. Chiefly power and household production on the Northwest Coast. In Price, T.D. and Feinman, G. (eds), Foundations of Social Inequality: 155–187. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Arribas, A., Galán, E., Martín-Pozas, J.M., Nicolau, J. and Salvador, P., 1971. Estudio mineralógico de la variscite de Palazuelo de las Cuevas, Zamora (España). Studia Geologica 2: 115–132.Google Scholar
Bar-Yosef Mayer, D.E., 1997. Neolithic shell bead production in Sinai. Journal of Archaeological Science 24: 97–111.Google Scholar
Belo, R.A., Trindade, L. and da Veiga Ferreira, O., 1961. Gruta da Cova da Moura. Comunicações dos Serviços Geológicos de Portugal 45: 391–418.Google Scholar
Bednarik, R.G. 1997. The role of Pleistocene beads in documenting hominid cognition. Rock Art Research 14: 27–41.Google Scholar
Bednarik, R.G. 2005. The technology and use of beads in the Pleistocene. Unpublished conference paper presented in ‘The Archaeology of Gesture: Reconstructing Prehistoric Technical and Symbolic Behaviour’ session, 11th Annual Meeting of the European Association of Archaeologists, 5–11 September 2005), Cork.Google Scholar
Blanco, J., Lopez Alonso, M.A., Edo, M. and Fernandez Turiel, J.L., 1996. Estudio analítico de determinación y de composición químico de las cuentas de collar de calaíta y otras materias del yacimiento de La Peñas (Quinielas de Vidriales, Zamora). Actes I Congrés del Neolític a la Península Ibérica. Rubricatum 1: 227–237.Google Scholar
Boaventura, R.J.N., 2009. As antas e o Megalitismo da região de Lisboa. Ph.D. dissertation. Lisbon: University of Lisbon.Google Scholar
Brumfiel, E. and Earle, T., 1987. Specialization, exchange, and complex societies: an introduction. In Brumfiel, E. and Earle, T. (eds), Specialization, Exchange, and Complex Societies: 1–9. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bueno Ramirez, P., 2010. Ancestros e imágenes antropomorfas muebles en el ámbito del megalitismo occidental: las placas decoradas. In Cacho, C., Maicas, R., Galán, E. and Martos, J.A. (coord.), Ojos que Nunca se Cierran: Ídolos en las Primeras Sociedades Campesinas: 39–78. Madrid: Ministerio de Cultura.Google Scholar
Cacho Quesada, C., Papi Rodes, C., Fernández, A. Sánchez-Barriga and Mathias, F.Alonso, 1996. La cestería decorada de la Cueva de los Murciélagos (Albuñol, Granada). Complutum Extra 6 (1): 105–122.Google Scholar
Cain, C.R., 2006. Implications of the marked artifacts of the Middle Stone Age of Africa. Current Anthropology 47 (4): 675–681.Google Scholar
Cardoso, J.L., 2000. The fortified site of Leceia (Oeiras) in the context of the Chalcolithic in Portuguese Estremadura. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 19 (1): 37–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cámara Serrano, J.A., 2001. El Ritual Funerario en la Prehistoria Reciente en el Sur de la Península Ibérica. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports (International Series 913).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, R., 2003. Archaeologies of Complexity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chapman, R., 2007. Evolution, complexity and the state. In Kohring, S., S. and Wynne-Jones, S. (eds), Socialising Complexity. Structure, Interaction and Power in Social Discourse: 13–28. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Chapman, R., 2008. Producing inequalities: regional sequences in later prehistoric southern Spain. Journal of World Prehistory 21: 195–260.Google Scholar
Childe, V.G., 1951 [1936]. Man Makes Himself. New York: New American Library.Google Scholar
Clark, J.E., 1995. Craft specialization as an archaeological category. Research in Economic Anthropology 16: 267–294.Google Scholar
Clark, J.E. and Blake, M., 2004. The power of prestige: competitive generosity and the emergence of rank societies in Lowland Mesoamerica. In Preucel, R.W. and Hodder, I. (eds), Contemporary Archaeology in Theory: A Reader. 258–281. Maiden: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Clark, J.E. and Houston, S.D., 1998. Craft specialization, gender, and personhood among the Post-Conquest Maya of Yucatan Mexico. In Costin, C.L. and Wright, R.P. (eds), Craft and Social Identity: 31–46. Arlington: American Anthropological Association (Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association 8).Google Scholar
Clark, J.E. and Parry, W.J., 1990. Craft specialization and cultural complexity. Research in Economic Anthropology 12: 289–346.Google Scholar
Cobb, C., 1993. Archaeological approaches to the political economy of nonstratified societies. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 5: 43–100.Google Scholar
Costin, C.L., 1991. Craft specialization: issues in defining, documenting, and explaining the organization of production. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 3: 1–56.Google Scholar
Costin, C.L., 2005. Craftproduction. In Maschner, H.D.G. and Chippindale, C. (eds), The Handbook of Archaeological Methods: 85–93. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
Cross, J.R., 1993. Craft specialization in nonstratified societies. Research in Economic Anthropology 14: 61–84.Google Scholar
Da Veiga Ferreira, O. 1951. Os artefactos préhistóricos de calaíte e sua distribuição em Portugal. Arqueologia e História 5: 85–93.Google Scholar
Da Veiga Ferreira, O. and Trindade, L., 1956. La nécropole de Cabeça da Arruda (Torres Vedras). In Congreso Internacional de Ciencias Prehistóricas e Protohistóricas, Actas de la IV Sesión: 503–520. Madrid: Zaragoza.Google Scholar
D'Errico, F., 2003. The invisible frontier: a multiple species model for the origin of behavioural modernity. Evolutionary Anthropology 12 (4): 188–202.Google Scholar
D'Errico, F., Henshilwood, C., Vanhaeren, M. and Van Niekerk, K., 2005. Nassarius kraussianus shell beads from Biombos Cave: evidence for symbolic behavior in the Middle Stone Age. Journal of Human Evolution 48: 3–24.Google Scholar
Díaz-Del-Río, P., 2006. An appraisal of social inequalities in central Iberia (c. 5300-1600 cal BC). In Díaz-del-Río, P. and Sanjuán, L. García (eds), Social Inequality in Iberian Late Prehistory. 67–77. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports (International Series 1525).Google Scholar
Díaz-Del-Río, P, Consuegra, S., Castañeda, N., Capote, M., Criado, C., Bustillo, M.A. and Pérez-Jiménez, J.L., 2006. The earliest flint mine in Iberia. Antiquity Project Gallery: <http://antiquity.ac.uk/projGall/diazdelrio307/>.Google Scholar
Dobres, M.-A. and Hoffman, C.R., 1994. Social agency and the dynamics of prehistoric technology. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 1 (3): 211–258.Google Scholar
Dubin, L.S., 2009. The History of Beads: From 100,000 B.C. to the Present. New York: Abrams.Google Scholar
Earle, T.K. 1997. How Chiefs Come to Power: The Political Economy in Prehistory. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Eerkens, J. and Bettinger, R.L., 2001. Techniques for assessing standardization in artifact assemblages: can we scale material variability? American Antiquity 66 (3): 493–504.Google Scholar
Evans, R.K., 1978. Early craft specialization: an example from the Balkan Chalcolithic. In Redman, C.L., Langhorne, J.W.T., Berman, J.J., Versaggi, N.M., Curtin, E.V. and Wanser, J.C. (eds), Social Archaeology: Beyond Subsistence and Dating. 113–129. New York Academic Press.Google Scholar
Fernandez Turiel, J.L., Gimeno, D., Lopez Solera, A. and Querol, A., 1993. Las mineralizaciones fosfáticas de los materials paleozóicos de la Provincia de Zamora. Anuario 1992 Instituo de Estudios Zamoranos Florian de Ocampo’ (Zamora):462–506.Google Scholar
Flad, R.K. and Hruby, Z.X., 2007. ‘Specialized’ production in archaeological contexts: rethinking specialization, the social value of products, and the practice of production. In Flad, R.K. and Hruby, Z.X. (eds), Rethinking Production in Archaeological Contexts: 1–19. Arlington: American Anthropological Association (Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association, 17).Google Scholar
Forenbaher, S., 1999. Production and Exchange of Bifacial Flaked Stone Artifacts During the Portuguese Chalcolithic. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports (International Series 756).Google Scholar
Faustino Carvalho, A., Antunes-Ferreira, N. and Valente, M.J., 2003. A gruta-necrópole neolítica do Algar do Barrão (Monsanto, Alcanena). Revista Portuguesa de Arqueologia 6 (1): 101–119 Google Scholar
Francis, P., 1990. Two bead strands from Andhra Pradesh, India. Asian Perspectives 29 (1): 45–50.Google Scholar
Gallay, G. and Spindler, K., 1970. Archäologische und antropologische Betrachtungen zu den Neolithisch-Kupferzeitlichen Funden aus der Cova da Moura/Portugal. Madrider Mitteilungen 1: 35–58.Google Scholar
Gallay, G., Spindler, K., Trindade, L. and Da Veiga Ferreira, O., 1973. O Monumento Préhistórico de Pai Mogo. Lisboa: Associacao dos Arqueólogos Portugueses.Google Scholar
Gilman, A., 1987. Unequal development in Copper Age Iberia. In Brumfiel, E.M. and Earle, T.K. (eds), Specialization, Exchange, and Complex Societies: 22–29. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gilman, A., 1996. Craft specialization in Late Prehistoric Mediterranean Europe. In Childe, V.G. and Wailes, B. (eds), Craft Specialization and Social Evolution: In Memory of V. Gordon Childe: 67–71. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology.Google Scholar
Gilman, A., 2001. Assessing political development in Copper and Bronze Age Southeast Spain. In Haas, J. (ed.), From Leaders to Rulers: 59–81. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.Google Scholar
Gilman, A., 2006. Issues in the prehistory of Southeast Spain. Unpublished paper, presented at ‘The Obermann Seminar on Comparative Archaeologies: The American Southwest (AD 900–1600) and the Iberian Peninsula (3000–1500 BC)’. Iowa City.Google Scholar
Gonçalves, A.A.H.deB., 1980. Elementos de Adorno de Gor Verde Provenientes de Estaçõs Arqueológicas Portuguesas: Importäncia do seu Sstudo Mineralógico. Porto: Trabalhos de Instituto de Antropologica ‘Dr Mendes Corrěa’, 40.Google Scholar
Gonçalves, A.A.HdeB. and Reis, M.L., 1982. Estudo Mineralógico de Adorno de Cor Verde Provenientes de Estações Portuguesas. Porto: Trabalhos de Instituto de Antropologica ‘Dr Mendes Corrěa’, 43.Google Scholar
Gonçalves, V.S., 1994. A Primeira metade do 3o Milenio no Centro/Sul de Portugal: Algumas breves reflexöes, enquanto outras näo são posiveis. Trabalhos de Arqueología e Etnologia 34 (3): 117–131.Google Scholar
Gonçalves, V.S. 1999. Time, landscape and burials 1. Megalithic rites of ancient peasant societies in central and southern Portugal: an initial review. Journal of Iberian Archaeology 1: 83–109.Google Scholar
Gonçalves, V.S., 2008. Cascais in the 3rd Millennium BC. Cascais: Cämara Municipal.Google Scholar
Gonçalves, V.S. and Calado, M., 2006. Working at home (and abroad): the atelier of engraved schist plaques of Águas Frias (Alandroal). Abstracts of the UISPP XV Congress: 251. Lisbon: UISPP.Google Scholar
Goñi Quinteiro, A., Rodríguez, A. Rodríguez; Socas, D. Martín, Francisco Ortega, I. and Camalich Massieu, M.D., 1999. La tecnología de los elementos de adorno personal en materias minerales durante el Neolítico Medio. El ejemplo del poblado de Cabecicos Negros (Almería). Saguntum: Papeles del Laboratorio de Arqueología de Valencia, Extra-2 (II Congrés del Neolític a la Península Ibérica): 163–170.Google Scholar
Harrison, R.J. and Gilman, A., 1977. Trade in the Second and Third Millennia BC between the Maghreb and Iberia. In Markotic, V. (ed.), Ancient Europe and the Mediterranean: 90–104. Warminster: Aris and Phillips.Google Scholar
Harrison, R.J. and Orozco Köhler, T., 2001. Beyond characterization: polished stone exchange in the Western Mediterranean. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 20 (2): 107–127.Google Scholar
Helms, M., 1993. Craft and the Kingly Ideal: Art, Trade, and Power. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Hurtado Peréz, V., 1987. El Calcolitico en la Cuenca Media del Guadiana y la necropolis de La Pijotilla. Arqueologia 14: 83–103.Google Scholar
Hurtado Perez, V., 1997. The dynamics of the occupation of the middle basin of the river Guadiana between the fourth and second millennia BC. In Keay, S. and Díaz-Andreu, M. (eds), The Archaeology of Iberia: The Dynamics of Change: 98–127. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hurtado Peréz, V., 2004. San Blas, the discovery of a large Chalcolithic settlement by the Guadiana River. Journal of Iberian Archaeology 6: 93–116.Google Scholar
Hurtado Peréz, V., 2008. Ídolos, estilos y territorios de los primeros campesinos en el sur peninsular. In Cacho Quesada, C., Maicas Ramos, R., Martos, J.A., and Navarrete, M.I. Martínez (eds), Acercándonos al Pasado. Prehistoria en 4 Actos: 1–11 Madrid: Museo Arqueológico Nacional and Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.Google Scholar
Jackes, M., Silva, A.M. and Irish, J.D., 2001. Dental morphology: a valuable contribution to our understanding of prehistory. Journal of Iberian Archaeology 3: 97–119.Google Scholar
Jalhay, E. and PAço, A., 1941. A Gruta II da Necrópole de Alapraia. Lisboa: Anais da Academia Portuguesa de História 4.Google Scholar
Jorge, S.O., 1990. Desenvolvimento da hierarquizacao social e da metalurgia. In Alarcao, J. (ed.), Nova Historia de Portugal. Vol. 1: Portugal das Origens a Romanizacao. Lisboa: Editorial Presenca.Google Scholar
Jorge, V.O., 1995. Late prehistoric funerary mounds in northern Portugal as indicators of social complexity. In Lillios, K.T. (ed.), The Origins of Complex Societies in hate Prehistoric Iberia: 140–152. Ann Arbor: International Monographs in Prehistory.Google Scholar
Kearney, M., 1996. Reconceptualizing the Peasantry: Anthropology in Global Perspective. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Kenoyer, J.M., 2003. Stone beads and pendant making techniques. In Lankton, J.W. (ed.), A Bead Timeline. Volume I: Prehistory to 1200CE: 14–19. Washington, D.C.: The Bead Society of Greater Washington.Google Scholar
Kenoyer, J.M., Vidale, M. and Bhan, K. K., 1991. Contemporary stone beadmaking in Khambhat, India: Patterns of craft specialization and organization of production as reflected in the archaeological record. World Archaeology 23 (1): 44–63.Google Scholar
Kleinmann, B. 1981. Röntgen-Untersuchung von Perlen aus Zambujal. In Sangmeister, E. and Schubart, H. (eds), Die Grabungen 1964–1973: 347–354. Mainz: Zabern (Madrider Beiträge 5, Zambujal Teil 1).Google Scholar
Kunst, M., 1995. Central places and social complexity in the Iberian Copper Age. In Lillios, K.T. (ed.), The Origins of Complex Societies in Late Prehistoric Iberia: 32–43. Ann Arbor: International Monographs in Prehistory.Google Scholar
Kunst, M. and Trindade, L., 1990. Zur Besiedlungsgeschichte des Sizandrotals: Ergebnisse aus der Küstenforschung. Madrider Mitteiliungen 31: 34–83.Google Scholar
Lago, M, Duarte, C., Valera, A., Albergaria, J., Almeida, F. and Faustino Carvalho, A., 1998. Povoado dos Perdigões (Reguengos de Monsaraz): dados preliminares dos trabalhos arqueológicos realizados em 1997. Revista Portuguesa De Arqueologia 1 (1): 45–152.Google Scholar
Lass, B., 1998. Crafts, chiefs, and commoners: production and control in precontact Hawai'i. In Costin, C.L. and Wright, R.P. (eds), Craft and Social Identity: 19–30. Arlington: American Anthropological Association (Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Society 8).Google Scholar
Leisner, G. and Leisner, V., 1943. Die Megalithgräber der Iberischen Halbinsel. Der Süden. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Leisner, G. and Leisner, V., 1959. Die Megalithgraber der Iberischen Halbinsel. Der Westen. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Leisner, V., 1965. Die Megalithgräber der Iberischen Halbinsel. Der Westen. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Leitão, M., North, C.T., Norton, J., Da Veiga Ferreira, O., and Zbyszewski, G., 1987. A gruta pré-histórica do Lugar do Canto, Valverde (Alcanede). O Arqueólogo Portugués Série 4(5):37–66.Google Scholar
Lillios, K.T., 1991. Competition to Fission: The Copper to Bronze Age Transition in the Lowlands of West-Central Portugal (3000–1500 BC). Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. New Haven: Yale University.Google Scholar
Lillios, K.T., ed., 1995. The Origins of Complex Societies in Late Prehistoric Iberia. Ann Arbor: International Monographs in Prehistory.Google Scholar
Lillios, K.T., 1997. Amphibolite tools of the Portuguese Copper Age (3000–2000BC): a geoarchaeological study of prehistoric economics and symbolism. Geoarchaeology 12: 137–163.Google Scholar
Lillios, K. 2008. Heraldry for the Dead: Memory, Identity, and the Engraved Stone Plaques of Neolithic Iberia. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Lillios, K.T., Waterman, A.J., Artz, J. and Josephs, R., 2010. The Neolithic-Early Bronze Age mortuary rocksheiter of Bolores, Torres Vedras, Portugal. Journal of Field Archaeology 35 (1): 19–39.Google Scholar
Maicas Ramos, R. and Montero Ruiz, I., 1998. Estudio y valoración del yacimiento Neolítico y Calcolítico de Loma de El Arteal (Cuevas de Almanzora, Almería). Boletín del Seminario de Estudios de Arte y Arqueología 64: 59–90.Google Scholar
McClure, S.B., Bernabeu, J., García, O., Aura, E., Molina, L., Descantes, C., Speakman, R., and Glascock, M., 2006. Testing technological practices: neutron activation analysis of Neolithic ceramics from Valencia, Spain. Journal of Archaeological Science 33: 671–680.Google Scholar
Meireles, C., Ferreira, N., and Reis, M.L., 1987. Variscite occurrence in Silurian formations from Northern Portugal. Com-municações do Serviços Geológicos de Portugal 73 (1–2): 21–27.Google Scholar
Mellars, P, 1989. Major issues in the emergence of modern humans. Current Anthropology 30: 349–385.Google Scholar
Mellars, P, 2005. The impossible coincidence: a single-species model for the origins of modern human behavior in Europe. Evolutionary Anthropology 14: 12–27.Google Scholar
Müller, R., Goldenber, G., Bartelheim, M., Kunst, M. and Pernicka, E., 2007. Zambujal and the beginnings of metallurgy in southern Portugal. In La Niece, S., Hook, D. and Craddock, P. (eds), Metals and Mines: Studies in Archaeometallurgy: 15–26. London: Archetype Publications.Google Scholar
Nocete, F., 2001. Tercer Milenio antes de Nuestra Era. Relaciones y Contradicciones Centro/ Periferia en el Valle del Guadalquivir. Barcelona: Bellaterra.Google Scholar
Nocete, F. and Linares, J.A., 1999. Las primeras sociedades mineras en Huelva. Alonso. Historia de la Provincia Huelva 4: 49–64.Google Scholar
Nocete, F., Sáez, R., Nieto, J.M., Cruz-Auñón, R., Cabrero, R., Alex, E., and Bayona, M.R., 2005. Circulation of silicified Oolitic limestone blades in South-Iberia (Spain and Portugal) during the third millennium B.C.: an expression of a core/ periphery framework. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 24: 62–81.Google Scholar
Nocete, F., Queipo, G., Sáez, R., Nieto, J.M., Inácio, N., Bayona, M.R., Peramo, A., Vargasd, J.M., Cruz-Auñón, R., Gil-Ibarguchi, J.I. and Santos, J.F., 2008. The smelting quarter of Valencina de la Concepción (Seville, Spain): the specialised copper industry in a political centre of the Guadalquivir Valley during the third millennium BC (2750–2500 BC). Journal of Archaeological Science 35: 717–732.Google Scholar
Odriozola, C.P., Hurtado-Pérez, V., Dias, M.I. and Valera, A.C., 2007. Bell Beaker production and consumption along the Guadiana River: An Iberian Perspective. Unpublished paper presented at ‘Vessels Inside and Outside: European Meeting on Ancient Ceramics’, Hungary, 24–27 October.Google Scholar
Odriozola, C.P., Linares-Catela, J.A. and Hurtado-Pérez, V., 2010. Variscite source and source analysis: testing assumptions at Pico Centeno (Encinasola, Spain). Journal of Archaeological Science 37 (12): 3146–3157.Google Scholar
Oosterbeek, L., 1993. Nossa Senhora das Lapas: excavation of prehistoric cave burials in central Portugal. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology 4: 49–62.Google Scholar
Ottaway, B.S., 2001. Innovation, production and specialization in early prehistoric Copper metallurgy. European Journal of Archaeology 4 (1): 87–112.Google Scholar
Pascual Benito, J.L., 1998. Utillaje Óseo, Adornos e Ídolos del Neolítico Valenciano. VII–III Milenios BP. Valencia: Servicio de Investigación Prehistórica. Trabajos Varios 95.Google Scholar
Perlès, C., 1992. Systems of exchange and organization of production in Neolithic Greece. Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology 5 (2): 115–164.Google Scholar
Perlès, C., 2001. The Early Neolithic in Greece: The First Farming Communities in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Perlès, C. and Vitelli, K.D., 1999. Craft specialization in the Neolithic of Greece. In Halstead, P. (ed.), Neolithic Society in Greece: 96–107. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.Google Scholar
Querré, G., Herbault, F. and Calligaro, T., 2008. Transport of Neolithic variscites demonstrated by PLXE analysis. X-Ray Spectrometry 37: 116–120.Google Scholar
Rice, P.M., 1981. Evolution of specialized pottery production: a trial model. Current Anthropology 3: 27–79.Google Scholar
Sangmeister, E. and Schubart, H., 1981. Zambujal, die Grabungen 1964 bis 1973. Mainz am Rhein: P. von Zabern.Google Scholar
Schneider, J. 1977. Was there a pre-Capitalist world system? Peasant Studies 6 (1): 20–29.Google Scholar
Schortman, E.M. and Urban, P.A., 2004. Modeling the roles of craft production in ancient political economies. Journal of Archaeological Research 12 (2): 185–226.Google Scholar
Schuhmacher, T.X. and Cardoso, J.L., 2007. Ivory objects from the Chalcolithic fortification of Leceia (Oeiras). Estudos Arqueológicos de Oeiras 15: 95–118.Google Scholar
Schuhmacher, T.X., Cardoso, J.L., and Banerjee, A., 2009. Sourcing African ivory in Chalcolithic Portugal. Antiquity 83: 983–997.Google Scholar
Silva, A.M., 2000. Dental anthropology of the Chalcolithic Portuguese population from Cova da Moura. In Varela, T. (ed.), Investigaciones en Biodiversidade Humana: 367–364. Santiago de Compostela: Universidade de Santiago de Compostela.Google Scholar
Silva, A.M., 2003. Portuguese populations of Late Neolithic and Chalcolithic periods exhumed from collective burials: an overview. Anthropologie 41 (1–2): 55–64.Google Scholar
Skeates, R., 2010. The art of memory: personal ornaments in Copper Age South-East Italy. In Lillios, K.T. and Tsamis, V. (eds), Material Mnemonics: Everyday Memory in Prehistoric Europe: 73–84. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Spielmann, K.A. 1998. Ritual craft specialists in middle range societies. In Costin, C.L. and Wright, R.P. (eds), Craft and Social Identity: 153–159. Arlington: American Anthropological Association. (Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association 8).Google Scholar
Spindler, K., 1981. Cova da Moura: Die Besiedlung des Atlantischen Küstengebietes Mittelportugals vom Neolithikum bis an das Ende der Bronzezeit. Mainz am Rhein: Von Zabern (Madrider Beiträge 7)Google Scholar
Spindler, K. and Gallay, G., 1972. Die tholos von Pai Mogo/Portugal. Madrider Mitteilungen 13: 38–108.Google Scholar
Thomas, J.T., 2009. Approaching specialization: craft production in Late Neolithic/ Copper Age Iberia. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology 19: 67–84.Google Scholar
Thomas, J.T., Lillios, K.T. and McCall, G., 2009. Revisiting the individual in prehistory: idiosyncratic engraving variation and the Neolithic slate plaques of the Iberian Peninsula. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 19 (1): 53–72.Google Scholar
Teruel Berbell, M.A., 1986. Objectos de adorno en el Neolítico de Andalucía Orientel: síntesis tipológica. Cuadernos de Prehistoria y Arqueología de la Universidad de Granada 11: 9–26 Google Scholar
Trindade, L. and Ferreira, O.Da Veiga, 1956. A necrópole do Cabeço da Arruda (Torres Vedras). Anais da Faculdade de Ciěncias do Porto 38 (4): 195–212.Google Scholar
Uerpmann, H.P. and Uerpmann, M., 2003. Zambujal: Die Stein und Beinartefakte aus den Grabungen 1964 bis 1973. Mainz am Rhein: Philip von Zabern (Madrider Beiträge Band 5, Zambujal Teil 4).Google Scholar
Valera, A.C., 2006. A margem esquerda do Guadiana (região de Mourão) dos finais do 4° aos inícios do 2° milénio AC. Era Arqueologia 7: 136–210.Google Scholar
Vanhaeren, M., 2006. Speaking with beads: the evolutionary significance of personal ornaments. In d'Errico, F. and Backwell, L. (eds), From Tools to Symbols: From Early Hominids to Modern Humans: 525–553. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press.Google Scholar
Vaz Pinto, C. and Parreira, R., 1979. Acerca do conceito de colónia no Calcolítico da Estremadura. Trabalhos do Grupo Espirita Amor ao Próximo 3: 135–145.Google Scholar
Villalba, M.J., Bañólas, L., Arenas, J., and Alonso, M., M. 1987. Les Mines Neolítiques de Can Tintorer, Gavá. Excavacions 1978–80. Barcelona: Generalitat de Catalunya. (Excavacions Arqueológiques a Catalunya, 6).Google Scholar
Waterman, A.J., Silva, A.M. and Tykot, R.H., in press. Stable isotopic indicators of diet from two late prehistoric burial sites in Portugal: an investigation of dietary evidence of social differentiation. Open Journal of Archeometry.Google Scholar
Waterman, A.J. and Thomas, J.T., 2011. When the bough breaks: childhood mortality and burial practice in late Neolithic Atlantic Europe. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 30 (2): 165–183.Google Scholar
Wiessner, P., 1983. Style and social information in Kalahari San projectile points. American Antiquity 48: 253–276.Google Scholar
Woods, A. and Lillios, K.T., 2006. Wearing stone: experimental use-wear analysis of the Iberian engraved slate plaques. In Bicho, N. (ed.), Actas do IV Congresso de Arqueologia Peninsular (Faro 2004): 29–37. Faro: Centro de Estudos de Património.Google Scholar
Wright, K. and Garrard, A., 2002. Social identities and the expansion of stone bead-making in Neolithic Western Asia: new evidence from Jordan. Antiquity 77: 267–284.Google Scholar
Zilhão, J., 2007. The emergence of ornaments and art: an archaeological perspective on the origins of behavioral modernity. Journal of Archaeological Research 15 (1): 1–54.Google Scholar