Skip to main content Accessibility help

Determinants of learning to perform spinal anaesthesia: a pilot study

  • Z. Kulcsar (a1), A. Aboulafia (a2), T. Hall (a3) and G. D. Shorten (a1)


Background and objective

This study examined attitudes and views held by stakeholders regarding their experience of training in spinal anaesthesia. The aim was to identify key factors related to learning and teaching processes which were perceived to influence the acquisition of competence in spinal anaesthesia.


The study was carried out at a busy acute tertiary referral teaching hospital over a period of 1 yr. It applied a qualitative research approach in three phases, namely (i) completion of preliminary questionnaires, (ii) completion of focused questionnaires and (iii) focus group discussions.


Five factors were perceived to be critical ‘determinants of learning’: (i) the existence of a formal, structured training programme; (ii) time constraints/theatre efficiency; (iii) trainer–trainee interaction; (iv) patient safety/trainee/trainer stressors; and (v) visualization of the anatomy and procedure.


The study highlighted the need for a formal and structured training programme in spinal anaesthesia, through which many of the undesirable and discouraging factors (such as stress, adverse trainer–trainee interaction and time constraints) identified in the study could be minimized. Further studies are needed to validate the results in other hospital settings, as well as to define the relative importance of each of the proposed determinants and their interrelationships.


Corresponding author

Correspondence to: Zsuzsanna Kulcsar, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Cork University Hospital, Wilton, Cork, Ireland. E-mail:; Tel: +353 87 0524270; Fax: +353 21 4546434


Hide All
1.Brown, K. Teaching anaesthesia in the operating theatre. Update Anaesth 2005; 6 (19): 1.
2.Kopacz, DJ, Neal, JM, Pollock, JE. The regional anesthesia “learning curve”. What is the minimum number of epidural and spinal blocks to reach consistency? Reg Anesth 1996; 21 (3): 182190.
3.Reznick, RK, MacRae, H. Teaching surgical skills – changes in the wind. N Engl J Med 2006; 355 (25): 26642669.
4.Aggarwal, R, Darzi, A. Technical-skills training in the 21st century. N Engl J Med 2006; 355 (25): 26952696.
5. Doyle D.J. Simulation in medical education: focus on anaesthesiology. Medical Education Online, 2005;
6.Bimbach, D, Santos, A, Bourlier, R et al. The effectiveness of video technology as an adjunct to teach and evaluate epidural anaesthesia performance skills. Anesthesiology 2002; 96 (1): 59.
7.Lim, MW, Burt, G, Rutter, SV. Use of three-dimensional animation for regional anaesthesia teaching: application to interscalene brachial plexus blockade. Br J Anaesth 2005; 94 (3): 372377.
8.Hoffman, H, Vu, D. Virtual reality: teaching tool of the twenty-first century? Acad Med 1997; 72 (12): 10761081.
9.Creswell, JW. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions. US: Sage Publication, 1998.
10.Pope, C, Mays, N. Qualitative research: reaching the parts other methods cannot reach. An introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research. BMJ 1995; 311: 4245.
11.Averbach, CF, Silverstein, LB. Qualitative Data: An Introduction to Coding and Analysis. New York: New York University Press, 2003.
12.Jones, R. Why do qualitative research? BMJ 1995; 311: 2.
13.Smith, AF, Pope, C, Goodwin, D, Mort, M. What defines expertise in regional anaesthesia? An observational analysis of practice. Br J Anaesth 2006; 97 (3): 401407.


Determinants of learning to perform spinal anaesthesia: a pilot study

  • Z. Kulcsar (a1), A. Aboulafia (a2), T. Hall (a3) and G. D. Shorten (a1)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed