Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-559fc8cf4f-lzpzj Total loading time: 0.319 Render date: 2021-03-07T01:09:05.874Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

Cost-reduction analysis of propofol versus sevoflurane: maintenance of anaesthesia for gynaecological surgery using the bispectral index

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 August 2006

M. M. R. F. Struys
Affiliation:
Ghent University Hospital, Department of Anaesthesia Ghent, Belgium
A. A. L. Somers
Affiliation:
Ghent University Hospital, Department of Pharmacy, Ghent, Belgium
N. Van Den Eynde
Affiliation:
Ghent University Hospital, Department of Anaesthesia Ghent, Belgium
L. L. G. Herregods
Affiliation:
Ghent University Hospital, Department of Anaesthesia Ghent, Belgium
D. Dyzers
Affiliation:
Ghent University Hospital, Department of Anaesthesia Ghent, Belgium
H. M. Robays
Affiliation:
Ghent University Hospital, Department of Pharmacy, Ghent, Belgium
E. P. Mortier
Affiliation:
Ghent University Hospital, Department of Anaesthesia Ghent, Belgium
Get access

Abstract

Background and objective: The study was designed to compare the costs of propofol versus sevoflurane for the maintenance of the hypnotic component of anaesthesia during general anaesthesia, guided by the bispectral index, for gynaecological laparoscopic surgery.

Methods: Forty ASA Grade I—II female patients scheduled for gynaecological laparoscopy were randomly allocated to two groups. All patients received a continuous infusion of remifentanil (0.25 µg kg−1 min−1) for 2 min. Then anaesthesia was induced with propofol 1% at 300 mL h−1 until loss of consciousness. To guide the bispectral index between 40 and 60, Group 1 patients received propofol 10 mg kg−1 h−1 initially, which was increased or decreased by 2 mg kg−1 h−1 steps; Group 2 patients received sevoflurane, initially set at 2 vol.% and adjusted with steps of 0.2–0.4%. The time and quality of anaesthesia and recovery were assessed in two postoperative standardized interviews.

Results: Patient characteristics, the propofol induction dose, the bispectral index and the haemodynamic profiles during induction of anaesthesia, and its duration, were similar between the groups. In Group 1, 7.55 ± 1.75 mg kg−1 h−1 propofol and in Group 2, 0.20 ± 0.09 mL kg−1 h−1 liquid sevoflurane were used for maintenance. The cost for maintenance, including wasted drugs, was higher when using propofol (€25.14 ± 10.69) than sevoflurane (€12.80 ± 2.67). Postoperatively, recovery profiles tended to be better with propofol; however, the day after discharge no differences were found.

Conclusions: When applying the bispectral index to guide the administration of hypnotic anaesthetic drugs, propofol-based maintenance of anaesthesia was associated with the highest cost. A trend towards a better recovery profile was obtained with propofol. However, on the day after discharge, no differences in quality were observed.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
2002 European Society of Anaesthesiology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 3 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 7th March 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Cost-reduction analysis of propofol versus sevoflurane: maintenance of anaesthesia for gynaecological surgery using the bispectral index
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Cost-reduction analysis of propofol versus sevoflurane: maintenance of anaesthesia for gynaecological surgery using the bispectral index
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Cost-reduction analysis of propofol versus sevoflurane: maintenance of anaesthesia for gynaecological surgery using the bispectral index
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *