Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-12T17:12:21.525Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Discussion Report

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2006

Get access

Abstract

The first afternoon session included three presentations addressing the issue of whether regulatory requirements are required or helpful to ensure efficient creditor protection. The chairman, Marcus Lutter of the University of Bonn, introduced the afternoon's topic by highlighting the positive effects a legal capital concept might have. John Armour of Cambridge University questioned this concept in his presentation by arguing that such a regime was outdated in today's economy. Holger Fleischer of the University of Bonn followed with additional critical remarks. In his comments, he referred to the distinction between voluntary and involuntary creditors, the latter having no opportunity to protect themselves by means of a contract. One example given were tort victims. John Armour focused strongly on a similar distinction; however, he referred to them as adjusting creditors and non-adjusting creditors. Most participants agreed on the major relevance of this distinction.

Type
Articles
Copyright
T.M.C. Asser Press 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)