Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T23:28:42.755Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Proper extensions of the 2-sphere’s conformal group present entropy and are 4-transitive

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2023

ULISSES LAKATOS*
Affiliation:
Instituto de Matemática e Estatística, Universidade de São Paulo, Rua do Matão 1010, Cidade Universitária, 05508-090 São Paulo, SP, Brazil (e-mail: fabiotal@ime.usp.br)
FÁBIO TAL
Affiliation:
Instituto de Matemática e Estatística, Universidade de São Paulo, Rua do Matão 1010, Cidade Universitária, 05508-090 São Paulo, SP, Brazil (e-mail: fabiotal@ime.usp.br)

Abstract

In this paper, we prove using elementary techniques that any group of diffeomorphisms acting on the 2-sphere and properly extending the conformal group of Möbius transformations must be at least 4-transitive or, more precisely, arc 4-transitive. As an important consequence, we derive that any such group must always contain an element of positive topological entropy. We also provide a self-contained characterization, in terms of transitivity, of the Möbius transformations within the full group of sphere diffeomorphisms.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Banyaga, A.. The Structure of Classical Diffeomorphism Groups (Mathematics and Its Applications, 400), 1st edn. Springer, New York, NY, 1997.Google Scholar
Farb, B. and Margalit, D.. A Primer on Mapping Class Groups (Princeton Mathematical Series, 49). Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2011.Google Scholar
Franks, J. and Misiurewicz, M.. Topological methods in dynamics. Handbook of Dynamical Systems. Eds. B. Hasselblat and A. Katok. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2002. Ch. 7, pp. 547598.Google Scholar
Gabai, D.. Convergence groups are Fuchsian groups. Ann. of Math. (2) 136(3) (1992), 447510.Google Scholar
Ghys, É.. Groups acting on the circle. Enseign. Math. T 47(1–2) (2001), 329407.Google Scholar
Giblin, J. and Markovic, V.. Classification of continuously transitive circle groups. Geom. Topol. 10(3) (2006), 13191346.Google Scholar
Handel, M.. Global shadowing of pseudo-Anosov homeomorphisms. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 5(3) (1985), 373377.Google Scholar
Kolev, B.. Sous-groupes compacts d’homéomorphismes de la sphère. Enseign. Math. 52(3–4) (2006), 193214.Google Scholar
Kwakkel, F. and Tal, F.. Homogeneous transformation groups of the sphere. Preprint, 2015, arXiv:1309.0179v2.Google Scholar
Le Roux, F.. On closed subgroups of the group of homeomorphisms of a manifold. J. Éc. polytech. Math. 1 (2014), 147159.Google Scholar
Matsuoka, T.. Periodic points and braid theory. Handbook of Topological Fixed Point Theory. Eds. Brown, R. F., Furi, M., Górniewicz, L. and Jiang, B.. Springer-Verlag, Dordrecht, 2005, pp. 171216.Google Scholar
Needham, T.. Visual Complex Analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999.Google Scholar
Siebenmann, L. C.. The Osgood–Schoenflies theorem revisited. Russian Math. Surveys 60(4) (2005), 645672.Google Scholar