Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-s9k8s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-13T05:01:10.926Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the dimensions of a family of overlapping self-affine carpets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2015

JONATHAN M. FRASER  and
PABLO SHMERKIN
JONATHAN M. FRASER
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK email jonathan.fraser@manchester.ac.uk
PABLO SHMERKIN
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Torcuato Di Tella University, Av. Figueroa Alcorta 7350, Buenos Aires, Argentina email pshmerkin@utdt.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We consider the dimensions of a family of self-affine sets related to the Bedford–McMullen carpets. In particular, we fix a Bedford–McMullen system and then randomize the translation vectors with the stipulation that the column structure is preserved. As such, we maintain one of the key features in the Bedford–McMullen set-up in that alignment causes the dimensions to drop from the affinity dimension. We compute the Hausdorff, packing and box dimensions outside of a small set of exceptional translations, and also for some explicit translations even in the presence of overlapping. Our results rely on, and can be seen as a partial extension of, Hochman’s recent work on the dimensions of self-similar sets and measures.

Type
Research Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 36 , Issue 8 , December 2016 , pp. 2463 - 2481
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press, 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barański, K.. Hausdorff dimension of the limit sets of some planar geometric constructions. Adv. Math. 210(1) (2007), 215–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bárány, B.. Dimension of the generalized 4-corner set and its projections. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 32(4) (2012), 1190–1215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnsley, M., Hutchinson, J. E. and Stenflo, Ö.. V-variable fractals: dimension results. Forum Math. 24(3) (2012), 445–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bedford, T.. Crinkly curves, Markov partitions and box dimensions in self-similar sets. PhD Thesis, University of Warwick, 1984.Google Scholar
Falconer, K.. Fractal Geometry (Mathematical Foundations and Applications) , 2nd edn. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falconer, K. and Miao, J.. Exceptional sets for self-affine fractals. Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 145(3) (2008), 669–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falconer, K. J.. The Hausdorff dimension of self-affine fractals. Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 103(2) (1988), 339–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falconer, K. J.. Generalized dimensions of measures on self-affine sets. Nonlinearity 12(4) (1999), 877–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feng, D.-J. and Wang, Y.. A class of self-affine sets and self-affine measures. J. Fourier Anal. Appl. 11(1) (2005), 107–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, A., Jordan, T. and Shmerkin, P.. The Hausdorff dimension of the projections of self-affine carpets. Fund. Math. 209(3) (2010), 193–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, J. M.. On the packing dimension of box-like self-affine sets in the plane. Nonlinearity 25(7) (2012), 2075–2092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, J. M.. Assouad type dimensions and homogeneity of fractals. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 366(12) (2014), 6687–6733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, J. M., Henderson, A. M., Olson, E. J. and Robinson, J. C.. On the Assouad dimension of self-similar sets with overlaps. Adv. Math. 273 (2015), 188–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochman, M.. On self-similar sets with overlaps and inverse theorems for entropy. Ann. of Math. (2) 180(2) (2014), 773–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochman, M.. On self-similar sets with overlaps and inverse theorems for entropy in higher dimensions. Work in progress, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, T.. Dimension of fat Sierpiński gaskets. Real Anal. Exchange 31(1) (2005/06), 97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, T. and Jurga, N.. Self-affine sets with non-compactly supported random perturbations. Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Math. 39 (2014), 771–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, T. and Pollicott, M.. Properties of measures supported on fat Sierpinski carpets. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 26(3) (2006), 739–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, T., Pollicott, M. and Simon, K.. Hausdorff dimension for randomly perturbed self affine attractors. Comm. Math. Phys. 270(2) (2007), 519–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lalley, S. P. and Gatzouras, D.. Hausdorff and box dimensions of certain self-affine fractals. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 41(2) (1992), 533–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larman, D. G.. A new theory of dimension. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 17 (1967), 178–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackay, J. M.. Assouad dimension of self-affine carpets. Conform. Geom. Dyn. 15 (2011), 177–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMullen, C.. The Hausdorff dimension of general Sierpiński carpets. Nagoya Math. J. 96 (1984), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orponen, T.. On the distance sets of self-similar sets. Nonlinearity 25(6) (2012), 1919–1929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przytycki, F. and Urbański, M.. On the Hausdorff dimension of some fractal sets. Studia Math. 93(2) (1989), 155–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shmerkin, P.. Overlapping self-affine sets. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 55(4) (2006), 1291–1331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomyak, B.. Measure and dimension for some fractal families. Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 124(3) (1998), 531–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar