Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-4hvwz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T22:18:53.392Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Liapunov stability and adding machines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2008

Jorge Buescu  and
Ian Stewart
Jorge Buescu
Affiliation:
Nonlinear Systems Laboratory, Mathematics Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
Ian Stewart
Affiliation:
Nonlinear Systems Laboratory, Mathematics Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Let X be a locally connected locally compact metric space and f: X → X a continuous map. Let A be a compact transitive set under f. If A is asymptotically stable, then it has finitely many connected components, which are cyclically permuted. If it is Liapunov stable, then A may have infinitely many connected components. Our main result states that these form a Cantor set on which f is topologically conjugate to an adding machine. A number of consequences are derived, including a complete classification of compact transitive sets for continuous maps of the interval and the Liapunov instability of the invariant Cantor set of Denjoy maps of the circle.

Type
Research Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , April 1995 , pp. 271 - 290
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Arrowsmith, D. K. and Place, C. M.. An Introduction to Dynamical Systems. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1990.Google Scholar
[2]Block, L. and Coven, E. M.. ω-limit sets for maps of the interval. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 6 (1986), 335–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Bowen, R. and Franks, J.. The periodic points of maps of the disk and the interval. Topology 15 (1976), 337–342.Google Scholar
[4]Collet, P. and Eckmann, J. P.. Iterated Maps of the Interval as Dynamical Systems. Birkhäuser: Basel 1980.Google Scholar
[5]Dellnitz, M., Golubitsky, M. and Melbourne, I.. The structure of symmetric attractors. Preprint. University of Houston, 1991;Google Scholar
Dellnitz, M., Golubitsky, M. and Melbourne, I.. Arch. Rational. Mech. Anal. 123 (1993), 75–98.Google Scholar
[6]Denvir, J.. Private communication.Google Scholar
[7]Eckmann, J. P. and Ruelle, D.. Ergodic theory of chaos and strange attractors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 57 (1985), 617–656.Google Scholar
[8]Fuchs, L.. Infinite Abelian Groups. Vol. 1. Academic: New York, 1970.Google Scholar
[9]Gambaudo, J. M. and Tresser, C.. Self-similar constructions in smooth dynamics: rigidity, smoothness and dimension. Commun. Math. Phys. 150 (1992), 45–58.Google Scholar
[10]Guckenheimer, J.. Sensitive dependence on initial conditions for one-dimensional maps. Commun. Math. Phys. 70 (1979), 133–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Guckenheimer, J. and Holmes, P.. Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems and Bifurcations of Vector Fields. Springer: New York, 1983.Google Scholar
[12]Hirsch, M.. Components of attractors. University of California at Berkeley. Unpublished note. 1992.Google Scholar
[13]Hocking, J. G. and Young, G. S.. Topology. Addison-Wesley: Reading MA, 1961.Google Scholar
[14]Hofbauer, F. and Raith, P.. Topologically transitive subsets of piecewise monotonic maps which contain no periodic points. Monatsh. Math. 107 (1989), 217–239.Google Scholar
[15]Jonker, L. and Rand, D.. Bifurcations in one dimension. I: the nonwandering set. Invent. Math. 62 (1981), 347–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Katznelson, Y.. The action of diffeomorphisms of the circle on the Lebesgue measure. J. Anal. Math. 36 (1979), 156–166.Google Scholar
[17]MacKay, R. S. and Meiss, J. D.. Hamiltonian Dynamical Systems. Adam Hilger: Bristol and Philadelphia, 1987.Google Scholar
[18]Mañé, R.. Ergodic Theory and Differentiable Dynamics. Springer: Berlin, 1987.Google Scholar
[19]Melbourne, I.. An example of a non-asymptotically stable attractor. Nonlinearity. 4 (1991), 835–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20]Milnor, J.. On the concept of attractor. Commun. Math. Phys. 99 (1985), 177–195.Google Scholar
[21]Newhouse, S.. Lectures on dynamical systems. In Dynamical Systems, CIME lectures, Bressanone. Birkhäuser: Basel, 1980.Google Scholar
[22]Ruelle, D.. A measure associated with Axiom A attractors. Amer. J. Math. 98 (1976), 619–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23]Schweitzer, P. A.. Counterexamples to the Seifert conjecture and opening closed leaves of foliations. Ann. Math. 100 (1974), 368–400.Google Scholar
[24]Simmons, G. F.. Introduction to Topology and Modern Analysis. McGraw-Hill: London, New York, 1963.Google Scholar
[25]Smale, S.. Differentiable dynamical systems. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 73 (1967), 747–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[26]Tang, J. J.. ω-limit sets for a class of self-mappings of the interval. J. Shanghai-Jiaotong-Univ. 125 (1987), 91–98.Google Scholar
[27]Walters, P.. An Introduction to Ergodic Theory. Springer: New York, 1982.Google Scholar
[28]Willms, J.. Asymptotic behaviour of iterated piecewise monotonic maps. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 8 (1988), 111–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar