Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T20:25:44.318Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pseudo-orbit tracing property and structural stability of expanding maps of the interval

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2008

S. V. Šlačkov
Affiliation:
Obninsk Institute of Atomic Power Engineering, 249020 Obninsk, USSR

Abstract

A version of pseudo-orbit tracing property for piecewise-continuous piecewise-expanding maps of the interval is proved. It is shown that the typical map of such a kind can be included in a 2m-parameter structurally stable family where m is the number of critical points.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[ABS]Afraimovich, V. S., Bykov, V. V. & Shil'nikov, L. P.. On structurally unstable attracting limit sets of Lorenz attractor type. Trans. Moscow Math. Soc. 2 (1983), 153216.Google Scholar
[Al]Alekseev, V. M.. Symbolic dynamics. Eleventh Math. Summer School. Naukova Dumka: Kiev, 1976 (Russian).Google Scholar
[An1]Anosov, D. V.. Geodesic flows on closed Riemannian manifolds with negative curvature. Proc Steklov Inst. Math. 90 (1967).Google Scholar
[An2]Anosov, D. V.. On certain class of invariant sets of smooth dynamical systems. Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Nonlinear Oscillations. Vol. 2. pp. 3945.Google Scholar
[B]Bowen, R.. On Axiom A diffeomorphisms. CMBS Regional Conf. Ser. Math., 35. Providence, RI: Am. Math. Soc., 1978.Google Scholar
[BPSY]Bunimovich, L. A., Pesin, Ya. B., Sinai, Ya. G. & Yakobson, M. V.. Ergodic theory of smooth dynamical systems. In: Dynamical Systems II. Moskva: 1985, pp. 113121 (Russian).Google Scholar
[CKY]Coven, E. M., Kan, I. & Yorke, J. A.. Pseudo-orbit shadowing in the family of tent maps. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 308 (1988), 227241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[GW]Guckenheimer, J. & Williams, R. F.. Structural stability of Lorenz attractors. IHES Publ. Math. 50 (1979), 5972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[K]Komuro, M.. Lorenz attractors do not have the pseudo-orbit tracing property. J. Math. Soc. Japan 37 (1985), 489514.Google Scholar
[L]Lorenz, E. N.. Deterministic nonperiodic flow. J. Atmosph. Sci. 20 (1963), 130141.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[NY]Nusse, H. E. & Yorke, J. A.. Is every approximate trajectory of some process near an exact trajectory of nearby process? Commun. Math. Phys. 114 (1988), 363379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[SV]Sinai, Ya. G. & Vul, E. B.. Hyperbolicity conditions for the Lorenz model. Physica 2D (1981), 37.Google Scholar
[š]šlačkov, S. V.. A theorem on e-trajectories for Lorenz mappings. Funkts. Anal. Prilozh. 19 (1985), 8485 (Russian).Google Scholar
[W]Walters, P.. On the pseudo-orbit tracing property and its relationship to stability. Springer Lecture Notes in Mathematics No. 668. Berlin: Springer, 231244.Google Scholar