Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T04:43:28.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Guidelines for the preparation of CV and list of publications. To standardize the format for encouraging a more homogenous evaluation of candidates for positions in psychiatry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 October 2011

Michele Tansella ,
Paolo Pancheri  and
Giovanni Battista Cassano
Michele Tansella
Affiliation:
Istituto di Psichiatria, Università degli Studi di Verona, Verona
Paolo Pancheri
Affiliation:
Ill Clinica Psichiatrica, Università degli Studi di Roma «La Sapienza», Roma
Giovanni Battista Cassano
Affiliation:
Istituto di Clinica Psichiatrica, Università degli Studi di Pisa, Pisa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other
Information
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , August 1997 , pp. 77 - 80
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAFIA

Association of American Medical Colleges (1988). The Maintenance of High Ethical Standards in the Conduct of Research. AAU: Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Benedetti, J., Green, S., Lee, M.L. & Crowley, J. (1993). Report of the ad hoc committee on design of an experiment on doubleblind refereeing. Statistical Science 3, 318–330.Google Scholar
Boots, S. (1992). Redundant publication: what is it and what can be done about it? CBE Views 6, 123–124.Google Scholar
Cantekin, A.I., McGuire, T.W. & Potter, R.L. (1990). Biomedical information, peer review, and conflict of interest as they influence public health. Journal of American Medical Association 263, 1427–1430.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cox, D., Gleser, L., Perlman, M., Reid, N. & Roeder, K. (1993). Report of the ad hoc committee on double-blind refereeing. Statistical Science 3, 310–317.Google Scholar
Digiursto, E. (1994). Equity in author ship: a strategy for assigning credit when publishing. Social Science and Medicine 38, 55–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Editoriale (1993). Pubblicazioni scientifiche e medicina accademica. MEDIC 1, s1–s2.Google Scholar
Fava, G.A. (1996). National trends of research in behavioural and medical sciences. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 65, 281–292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garfield, E. (1996). How can impact factors be improved. British Medical Journal 313, 411–413.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harvard Medical School (1988). Guidelines for Investigators in Scientific Research. Office of the Dean for Academic Affairs of the Harward Medical School: Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Howard, L. & Wilkinson, G. (1997). Impact factors of psychiatric journals. British Journal of Psychiatry 170, 109–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Institute of Medicine (1989). The Responsible Conduct of Research. Institute of Medicine: Washington DC.Google Scholar
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (1982). Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedicai journals. British Medical Journal 284, 1766–1769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kassirer, J.P. & Angell, M. (1991). On authorship and acknowledgements. New England Journal of Medicine 325, 1510–1512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lock, S. & Wells, S. (1993). Fraud and Misconduct in Medical Research. British Medical Journal Publishing Group: London.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G.G. & Fletcher, A.E. (1989). Citation trends of general psychiatric journals. Psychological Medicine 19, 15–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McHugh, P.R. (1991). The Professorial Promotions Committee at Johns Hopkins School of Medicine. A Letter of Experience. Dean Office of the Johns Hopkins Medical School: Baltimore. Questo rapporto è stato anche tradotto in spagnolo e pubblicato su Med. Clin. (Bare.) 102, 259–266.Google Scholar
Nobel, J.J. (1990). Comparison of research quality guidelines in academic and nonacademic environments. Journal of American Medical Association 263, 1435–1437.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Orlandi, F., Bianchi, P., Budiilon, G., Francavilla, A. & Okolicsanyi, L. (1995). Criteri di valutazione nei concorsi a posti di professore universitario di I fascia. Affidabilità e predittività. MEDIC 3, 155–158.Google Scholar
Pancheri, P. (1996). Pubblicare o non pubblicare in italiano? Questo è il problema. Giornale Italiano di Psicopatologia 3, 197–200.Google Scholar
Rennie, D. (1990). Editorial peer review in biomedicai publication. The first international Congress. Journal of American Medical Association 263, 1317–1441. Si tratta di una serie di breve articoli, firmati da autori diversi, che costituiscono le sintesi delle relazioni al suddetto Congresso.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royal College of Physicians of London (1991). Fraud and Misconduct in Medical Research. Royal College of Physicians: London.Google Scholar
Tansella, M. (1994). La revisione da parte dei referee degli articoli inviati ad «Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale». Alcune riflessioni sul fenomeno della «pressione a pubblicare» e sulla «ambiguous authorship». Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale 3, 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tansella, M. (1997). Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale cinque anni dopo. Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale 6, 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar