Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T13:23:17.928Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Usefulness of the DNA-fingerprinting pattern and the multilocus enzyme electrophoresis profile in the assessment of outbreaks of meningococcal disease

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

N. Weis  and
I. Lind
N. Weis
Affiliation:
Neisseria Department, Statens Seruminstitut, Artillerivej 5, 2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark
I. Lind
Affiliation:
Neisseria Department, Statens Seruminstitut, Artillerivej 5, 2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The objective of the study was to assess whether genotypic characterization by means of DNA-fingerprinting pattern (DFP) and multilocus enzyme electrophoresis (MEE) profile as compared to phenotypic characterization would improve the differentiation of Neisseria meningitidis strains associated with outbreaks from strains associated with sporadic cases of meningococcal disease. In addition, the differentiation of serogroup C carrier strains from those associated with an outbreak of serogroup C meningococcal disease was investigated.

A total of 118 N. meningitidis strains were available for the study: 59 from patients involved in outbreaks of meningococcal disease (2 serogroup B and 2 serogroup C), 37 from patients considered to be sporadic cases and 22 serogroup C carrier strains.

Among the 59 strains from patients involved in outbreaks the 4 strains isolated from the patient registered as the first in each outbreak were designated the index strains. Among the remaining 55 outbreak strains 52 were either DFP-identical or DFP-indistinguishable when compared with the one relevant out of the 4 index strains. This was only the case for 17 of the 37 strains isolated from sporadic cases caused by the same serogroup of meningococci during the outbreak periods, and 5 of the 22 meningococcal strains isolated from healthy carriers. Among the 56 (52 + 4) DFP-identical or DFP-indistinguishable outbreak strains 5 different electrophoretic types were identified by MEE.

Among 59 assumed outbreak strains a total of 4 were identified as genotypically distinct. Among the 37 mainly DFP-indistinguishable or DFP-different strains from sporadic cases 17 different ETs were identified, and among the 22 mainly DFP-different carrier strains 13 different ETs were identified. Two strains among those selected from sporadic cases were identical to the outbreak strain. None of the local serogroup C carrier strains isolated during the outbreak of serogroup C disease were identical to the outbreak strain.

Both DNA-fingerprinting and MEE improved the differentiation of meningococci when compared with phenotypic characterization. The results indicate that tracing a virulent strain within an open group of contacts is irrelevant.

Type
Research Article
Information
Epidemiology & Infection , Volume 116 , Issue 2 , April 1996 , pp. 103 - 114
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

References

1.Samuelsson, S, Gustavsen, S, Rønne, T. Epidemiology of meningococcal disease in Denmark 1980–1988. Scand J Infect Dis 1991; 23: 723–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Samuelsson, S, Ege, P, Berthelsen, L, Lind, I. An outbreak of serogroup B:15:P1. 16 meningococcal disease, Frederiksborg county, Denmark, 1987–1989. Epidemiol Infect 1992; 108: 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Rønne, T, Berthelsen, L, Buhl, LH, Lind, I. Comparative studies on pharyngeal carriage of Neisseria meningitidis during a localized outbreak of serogroup C meningococcal disease. Scand J Infect Dis 1993; 25: 331–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Kronvall, G.A rapid slide-agglutination method for typing pneumococci by means of specific antibody adsorbed to protein A-containing staphylococci. J Med Microbiol 1973; 6: 187–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Abdillahi, H, Poolman, JT. Whole cell ELISA for typing Neisseria meningitidis with monoclonal antibodies. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1987; 48: 367–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Sambrook, J, Fritsch, EF, Maniatis, T. Molecular cloning, 3. A laboratory manual, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1989.Google Scholar
7.Selander, RK, Caugant, D, Ochman, H, Musser, JM, Gilmour, MN, Whittam, TS. Methods of multilocus enzyme electrophoresis for bactericidal population genetics and systematics. Appl Environ Microbiol 1986; 51: 873–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Maiden, MCJ, Feavers, IM. Meningococcal typing. J Med Microbiol 1994; 40: 157–8.Google ScholarPubMed
9.Bygraves, JA, Maiden, MCJ. Analysis of the clonal relationships between strains of Neisseria meningitidis by pulsed field gel electrophoresis. J Gen Microbiol 1992; 138: 523–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Fox, AJ, Jones, DM, Gray, SJ, Caugant, DA, Saunders, NA. An epidemiologically valuable typing method for Neisseria meningitidis by analysis of restriction fragment length polymorphisms. J Med Microbiol 1991; 34: 265–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Pitt, TL. Bacterial typing systems: the way ahead. J Med Microbiol 1994; 40: 1–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Caugant, DA, Frøholm, LO, Bøvre, K et al. Intercontinental spread of a genetically distinctive complex of clones of Neisseria meningitidis causing epidemic disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1986; 83: 4927–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Tompkins, LS, Troup, NJ, Woods, T, Bibb, W, McKinney, RM. Molecular epidemiology of Legionella species by restriction endonuclease and alloenzyme analysis. J Clin Microbiol 1987; 25: 1875–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Kristiansen, B-K, Bjorvatn, B, Lund, V, Lindqvist, B, Holten, E. Differentiation of B15 strains of Neisseria meningitidis by DNA restriction endonuclease fingerprinting. J Infect Dis 1984; 150: 672–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Renaud, F, Freney, J, Etienne, J et al. Restriction endonuclease analysis of Staphylococcus epidermidis DNA may be a useful epidemiological marker. J Clin Microbiol 1988; 26: 1729–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Ørskov, F, Ørskov, I. Summary of a workshop on the clone concept in the epidemiology, taxonomy, and evolution of the enterobacteriaceae and other bacteria. J Infect Dis 1983; 148: 346–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Cartwright, KAV, Stuart, JM, Jones, DM, Noah, ND. The Stonehouse survey: nasopharyngeal carriage of meningococci and Neisseria lactamica. Epidemiol Infect 1987; 99: 591–601.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Ashton, FE, Mancino, L, Ryan, AJ, Poolmann, JT, Abdillahi, H, Zollinger, WD. Serotypes and subtypes of Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B strains associated with meningococcal disease in Canada 1977–1989. Can J Microbiol 1991; 37: 613–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Facinelli, B, Biavasco, F, Varaldo, PE. Use of DNA fingerprinting in an epidemiologic study of outbreak-specific and non-specific strains of group C Neisseria meningitidis. Eur J Epidemiol 1990; 6: 80–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Mastrantonio, P, Congiu, ME, Occhionero, M, Stroffolini, T. Genomic fingerprints and phenotypic characteristics of strains of Neisseria meningitidis causing disease in Italy. Microbiologica 1990; 13: 109–13.Google ScholarPubMed
21.Caugant, DA, Kristiansen, B-E, Frøholm, LO, Bøvre, K, Selander, RK. Clonal diversity of Neisseria meningitidis from a population of asymptomatic carriers. Infect Immun 1988; 56: 2060–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Jewes, L, Norman, P, McKendrick, MW. Value of throat swabs in meningococcal meningitis. J Clin Pathol 1989; 42: 1229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed