Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T19:24:02.137Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Transmission patterns of African horse sickness and equine encephalosis viruses in South African donkeys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2002

C. C. LORD
Affiliation:
Florida Medical Entomology Laboratory, University of Florida – IFAS, Vero Beach, FL 32962, USA
G. J. VENTER
Affiliation:
ARC-Onderstepoort Veterinary Institute, Onderstepoort, Republic of South Africa
P. S. MELLOR
Affiliation:
Institute for Animal Health, Pirbright Laboratory, Ash Road, Pirbright, UK
J. T. PAWESKA
Affiliation:
ARC-Onderstepoort Veterinary Institute, Onderstepoort, Republic of South Africa
M. E. J. WOOLHOUSE
Affiliation:
Centre for Tropical Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Roslin, Midlothian, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

African horse sickness (AHS) and equine encephalosis (EE) viruses are endemic to southern Africa. AHS virus causes severe epidemics when introduced to naive equine populations, resulting in severe restrictions on the movement of equines between AHS-positive and negative countries. Recent zoning of South Africa has created an AHS-free zone to facilitate equine movement, but the transmission dynamics of these viruses are not fully understood. Here, we present further analyses of serosurveys of donkeys in South Africa conducted in 1983–5 and in 1993–5. Age-prevalence data are used to derive estimates of the force of infection, λ. For both viruses, λ was highest in the northeastern part of the country and declined towards the southwest. In most of the country, EE virus had a higher transmission rate than AHS. The force of infection increased for EE virus between 1985 and 1993, but decreased for AHS virus. Both viruses showed high levels of variation in transmission between districts within the same province, particularly in areas of intermediate transmission. These data emphasize the focal nature of these viruses, and indicate areas where further data will assist in understanding the geographical variation in transmission.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2002 Cambridge University Press