Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T21:44:22.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Statistical concepts in the theory of bacterial mutation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

P. Armitage
P. Armitage
Affiliation:
From the Medical Research Council's Statistical Research Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper is a short exposition of the mathematical and statistical theory of the growth of bacterial populations subject to mutation.

A mathematical model for the long-term development of a mixed population with two types of organism is proposed. The proportion of organisms which are of the mutant type eventually approaches an asymptotic value, which is independent of the initial composition of the population. A procedure is outlined for estimating the forward and backward mutation rates from a long-term experiment.

The exact interpretation of the constants representing mutation rates requires some assumption about the point of time, during an individual life cycle, at which mutations occur. The usual assumption is that mutations can occur with equal frequency at all instants during the cycle.

In short-term experiments, in which the proportion of mutants is at all times negligible, it is important to consider the variation between the numbers of mutants developing in replicate cultures. The theoretical distribution of Lea & Coulson may be disturbed by the failure of any one of a number of assumptions; the effects of such disturbances are considered in some detail.

Various methods of estimating the mutation rate from an observed series of replicate cultures are examined. Two of the main sources of disturbance of the theoretical distribution may be delay of phenotypic expression, and the existence of multinucleate cells with dominant mutation. These factors affect particularly the lower tail of the distribution, and it is suggested that a fairly safe procedure may be to estimate the mutation rate from the upper quartile of the observed distribution. Tables 3 and 4 enable the estimate of the mutation rate, together with 95% confidence limits, to be readily calculated.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 51 , Issue 2 , June 1953 , pp. 162 - 184
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1953

References

Armitage, P. (1952). The statistical theory of bacterial populations subject to mutation. J. R. statist. Soc. B, 14, 1.Google Scholar
Bunting, M. I. (1940). The production of stable populations of color variants of Serratia marcescens no. 274 in rapidly growing cultures. J. Bact. 40, 69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bunting, M. I. (1946). The inheritance of color in bacteria, with special reference to Serratia marcescens. Cold Spr. Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 11, 25.Google Scholar
Catcheside, D. G. (1951). The Genetics of Micro-organisms. London: Pitman.Google Scholar
Dean, A. C. R. & Hinshelwood, C. N. (1952). The applicability of the statistical fluctuation test. Proc. Roy. Soc. B, 139, 236.Google ScholarPubMed
Demerec, M. & Fano, U. (1945). Bacteriophage-resistant mutants in Escherichia coli. Genetics, 30, 119.Google Scholar
Deskowitz, M. & Shapiro, A. (1935). Numerical relations of an unstable variant of Salmonella aerotrycke. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol., N.Y., 32, 573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, S. & Hinshelwood, C. N. (1950). An investigation of the nature of certain adaptive changes in bacteria. Proc. Roy. Soc. B, 136, 562.Google ScholarPubMed
Kendall, D. G. (1952). Les processus stochastiques de croissance en biologie. Ann. Inst. Poincaré (to appear).Google Scholar
Kendall, D. G. (1953). Stochastic processes and the growth of bacterial colonies. Symp. Soc. exp. Biol. 7 (to appear).Google Scholar
Lea, D. E. & Coulson, C. A. (1949). The distribution of the numbers of mutants in bacterial populations. J. Genet. 49, 264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lieb, M. (1951). Forward and reverse mutation in a histidine-requiring strain of Escherichia coli. Genetics, 36, 460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luria, S. E. & Delbrück, M. (1943). Mutations of bacteria from virus sensitivity to virus resistance. Genetics, 28, 491.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nair, K. R. (1940). Table of confidence interval for the median in samples from any continuous population. Sankhyā, 4, 551.Google Scholar
National Bureau of Standards (1950). Tables of the Binomial Probability Distribution. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Newcombe, H. B. (1948). Delayed phenotypic expression of spontaneous mutations in Escherichia coli. Genetics, 33, 447.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newcombe, H. B. (1949). Origin of bacterial variants. Nature, Lond., 164, 150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newcombe, H. B. & Hawirko, R. (1949). Spontaneous mutation to streptomycin resistance and dependence in Escherichia coli. J. Bact. 57, 565.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Novick, A. & Szilard, L. (1950). Experiments with the chemostat on spontaneous mutations of bacteria. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci., Wash., 36, 708.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pearson, K. (1934). Tables of the Incomplete Beta-function. London: ‘Biometrika’ Office.Google Scholar
Ryan, F. J. (1952 a). Adaptation to use lactose in Escherichia coli. J. gen. Microbiol. 7, 69.Google Scholar
Ryan, F. J. (1952 b). Distribution of numbers of mutant bacteria in replicate cultures, Nature, Lond., 169, 882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, A. (1946). The kinetics of growth and mutations in bacteria. Cold Spr. Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 11, 228.Google Scholar
Stocker, B. A. D. (1949). Measurements of rate of mutation of flagellar antigenic phase in Salmonella typhi-murium. J. Hyg., Camb., 47, 398.Google ScholarPubMed
Thompson, W. R. (1936). On confidence ranges for the median and other expectation distributions for populations of unknown distribution form. Ann. math. Statist. 7, 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar