No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The significance of volatility and water solubility in disinfection processes
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 May 2009
Extract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
1. Solubility of a germicide in the medium (water or air) in which it is operating appears often to be the most important physical characteristic governing degree of activity on bacteria (partition law).
2. Evidence of the importance of solubility has only been derived from a study of the action of phenols and glycols, a high bactericidal activity never being registered unless solubility was low.
3. Other types of germicide were exceptional in that high solubility coincided with high bactericidal activity: iodine and maleic anhydride in the air; mercuric chloride and many organic acids in the test-tube.
4. Mixtures of germicide and bacteria as used in the test-tube were sprayed into the air, the bactericidal effect being usually increased or decreased according as to whether it was originally low or high in the test-tube.
5. The vapour pressures of most of the germicides used were deduced from the Clausius and Clapeyron formula, the boiling-points being determined by the bubbling method.
6. When the amount of a phenol used in the air is approximately proportional to the vapour pressure, the bactericidal effects of the different samples are more nearly parallel when the degree of saturation of the air is low than when it is high.
7. No phenol with a vapour pressure lower than 0·0021- mg. Hg, and tested at full saturation, sterilized the air during the first minute of the experiment, while all samples with, at least, 10 times this vapour pressure did so when at 12·5 % saturation.
8. Among the phenols tested, especially those having low vapour pressures, the concentration (w/w) in air is very much less than the concentration in water in the respective experimental conditions, where but few survivors is the criterion of efficacy. Owing to a number of different factors, the rapid decline in the initial concentration is more likely to be met with under air than under test-tube conditions.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1946
References
REFERENCES
Abramson, H. A. (1942). A stable hydrogen peroxide aerosol. Science, 96, 238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, A. H. & Twort, C. C. (1941). The effect of humidity of air on the disinfection capacity of mechanically atomized and heat volatilized germicidal aerosols. J. Hyg., Camb., 41, 117–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, A. H. & Twort, C. C. (1944). Germicidal mists and vapours in air disinfection. J. Hyg., Camb., 43, 382.Google ScholarPubMed
Bourdillon, R. B., Lidwell, O. M. & Thomas, J. C. (1941). A slit sampler for collecting and counting airborne bacteria. J. Hyg., Camb., 41, 197–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kar, B. C. (1942). Oxidation of resorcinol by hydrogen peroxide in the presence of tungstic acid sol as catalyst. J. Indian Chem. Soc. 19, 499.Google Scholar
Lovelock, J. E., Lidwell, O. M. & Raymond, W. F. (1944). Vapourization of lactic acid as an aerial disinfectant. Nature, Lond., 153, 743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, O. H. (1943). Sterilization of air with glycol vapours. Harvey Lect. Series 38, pp. 227–54.Google Scholar
Smith, A. & Menzies, W. C. (1910). Studies in vapour pressure. J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 32, 907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Twort, C. C., Baker, A. H., Finn, S. R. & Powell, E. O. (1940). The disinfection of closed atmospheres with germicidal aerosols. J. Hyg., Camb., 40, 253–344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Twort, C. C., Baker, A. H., & White, L. J. (1944). Air disinfection. Brit. Med. J. no. 4361, p. 190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, L. J., Baker, A. H. & Twort, C. C. (1944). Aerial disinfection. Nature, Lond., 153, 141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
You have
Access