Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T07:30:41.368Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The serological relationship between Escherichia coli O157 and Yersinia enterocolitica O9 using sera from patients with brucellosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

H Chart
Affiliation:
Division of Enteric Pathogens, Central Public Health Laboratory, 61 Colindale Avenue, London NW9 5HT, UK
O. A Okubadejo
Affiliation:
Public Health Laboratory, St Mary's General Hospital, East Wing, Milton Road, Portsmouth P03 6AQ
B Rowe
Affiliation:
Division of Enteric Pathogens, Central Public Health Laboratory, 61 Colindale Avenue, London NW9 5HT, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Sera from ten patients with positive brucella serology were used to investigate antibody cross-reactions between the O-antigens of Escherichia coli 0157 and Yersinia enterocolitica 09. SDS-PAGE profiles of lipopolysaccharide (LPS), purified from strains of E. coli 0157 and Y. enterocolitica 09, were reacted with sera by immunoblotting. All ten sera contained antibodies which bound to the LPS of E. coli 0157, and five of these sera also contained antibodies which bound to the LPS of Y. enterocolitica 09. Absorption studies using these five cross–reacting sera indicated the existence of at least three epitopes exposed on the O–antigens of E. coli 0157 and Y. enterocolitica 09. One antigen binding site appeared to be exposed on the LPS of both organisms, while one epitope was exposed on the LPS of E. coli 0157 only, and another on the LPS of Y. enterocolitica 09 only.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

References

REFERENCES

1.Levin, M, Walters, MDS, Barratt, TM. Hemolytic uremic syndrome. Adv Pediatr Infect Dis 1989; 4: 5182.Google Scholar
2.Chart, H, Scotland, SM, Rowe, B. Serum antibodies to Escherichia coli serotype 0157:H7 in patients with hemolytic uremic syndrome. J Clin Microbiol 1989; 27: 285–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Chart, H, Scotland, SM, Smith, HR, Rowe, B. Antibodies to Escherichia coli 0157 in patients with haemorrhagic colitis and haemolytic uraemic syndrome. J Clin Pathol 1989; 42: 973–6.Google Scholar
4.Gilmour, A, Walker, SJ. Isolation and identification of Yersinia enterocolitica and the Yersinia enterocolitica-like bacteria. J Appl Bacteriol Symp Suppl 1988; 213–36S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Corbel, MJ. Brucellosis: Epidemiology and prevalence worldwide. In: Young, EJ, Corbel, MJ, eds. Brucellosis: Clinical and laboratory aspects. Florida: CRC Press, 1989; 2540.Google Scholar
6.Perry, MB, MacLean, L, Griffith, DW. Structure of the O-chain of the phenol-phase soluble lipopolysaccharide of Escherichia coli 0157: H7. Biochem Cell Biol 1986; 64: 21–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Caroff, M, Bundle, DR, Perry, MP. Structure of the O-chain of the phenol-phase solubale cellular lipopolysaccharide of Yersinia enterocolitica serotype 0:9. Eur J Biochem 1984; 139: 195200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Bundle, DR, Cherwonogrodzky, JW, Caroff, M, Perry, MB. The lipopolysaccharides of Brucella abortus and B. Melitensis. Ann Inst Pasteur Microbiol 1987; 138: 92–8.Google Scholar
9.Corbell, MJ. The serological relationship between Brucella spp., Yersinia enterocolitica serotype IX and Salmonella serotypes of Kauffmann-White group N. J Hyg 1975; 75: 151–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Lindberg, AA, Haeggman, S, Karlson, K, Carlson, HE, Mair, NS. Enzyme immunoassay of the antibody response to Brucella and Yersinia enterocolitica 09 infections in humans. J Hyg 1982; 88: 295307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Notenboom, RH, Borezyk, A, Karmali, MA, Duncan, LMC. Clinical relevance of a serological cross-reaction between Escherichia coli 0157 and Brucella abortus. Lancet 1987; II: 745.Google Scholar
12.Sandulache, R, Marx, A. Immunological studies of a Yersinia enterocolitica 09 lipopoly-saccharide cross-reacting with Brucell a abortus and Vibrio cholerae extracts. Ann Microbiol Inst Pasteur 1978; 129: 425–35.Google Scholar
13.Stuart, FA, Corbel, MJ. Identification of a serological cross-reaction between Brucella abortus and Escherichia coli. Vet Rec 1982; 110: 202–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Chart, H, Cheasty, T, Cope, D, Gross, RJ, Rowe, B. The serological relationship between Yersinia enterocolitica 09 and Escherichia coli 0157 using sera from patients with yersiniosis and haemolytic uraemic syndrome. Epidemiol Infect. In press.Google Scholar
15.Parratt, D, Neilsen, KH, White, RG, Payne, DJH. Radioimmunoassay of IgM, IgG and IgA Brucella antibodies. Lancet 1977; I: 1076–8.Google Scholar
16.Hewitt, WG, Payne, DJH. Estimation of IgG and IgM Brucella antibodies in infected and non-infected persons by a radioimmune technique. J Clin Pathol 1984; 37: 693–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Westphal, O, Jann, K. Bacteriallipopolysaccharide: Extraction with phenol-water and further applications of the procedure. Methods Carbohydr Chem 1965; 5: 8391.Google Scholar
18.Chart, H, Rowe, B. Purification of lipopolysaccharide from strains of Yersinia enterocolitica belonging to serogroups 03 and O9. FEMS Microbiol 1991; 77: 341–6.Google Scholar
19.Wray, W, Boulikas, T, Wray, VP, Hancock, R. Silver staining of proteins in polyacrylamide gels. Anal Biochem 1981; 118: 197203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Tsai, C-M, Frasch, CE. A sensitive silver stain for detecting lipopolysaccharide in polyacrylamide gels. Anal Biochem 1982; 119: 115–19.Google Scholar
21.Griffiths, E, Stevenson, P, Thorpe, R, Chart, H. Naturally occurring antibodies in human sera that react with the iron-regulated outer membrane proteins of Escherichia coli. Infect Immun 1985; 47: 808–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Chart, H, Smith, HR, Scotland, SM, Rowe, B, Milford, DV, Taylor, CM. Serological identification of Escherichia coli 0157: H7 infection in haemolytic uraemic syndrome. Lancet 1991; 337: 138–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar