Skip to main content Accessibility help

Serogroup W meningococcal disease: global spread and current affect on the Southern Cone in Latin America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2014

Reference Laboratory for Meningococci, Institute of Health Carlos III, Majadahonda, Spain
Sociedad Argentina de Infectología Pediátrica and Departamento de Medicina del Hospital de Niños ‘Dr Ricardo Gutiérrez’, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Sanofi Pasteur Medical Department for Latin America, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Reference Laboratory for Meningococci, Institute of Health Carlos III, Majadahonda, Spain
E-mail address:
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]


Meningococcal serogroup W strains have been emerging throughout the current century with most of the isolates belonging to the sequence type (ST11)/electrophoretic type (ET37) clonal complex (ST11/E37 CC), particularly since the international outbreak following Hajj 2000. That outbreak appears to have triggered off that trend, contributing to the spread of W ST11/ET37 CC strains globally; however, local strains could be also responsible for increases in the percentage and/or incidence rates of this serogroup in some countries. More recently, unexpected increases in the percentage and incidence rate of W has been noticed in different countries located in the South Cone in Latin America, and W ST11/ET37 CC strains now appear as endemic in the region and an extensive immunization programme with tetravalent conjugate vaccine (covering serogroups A, C, Y and W) has been recently implemented in Chile. It is difficult to ascertain whether we are observing the emergence of W ST11 CC strains in different geographical areas or whether the Hajj 2000 strain is still spreading globally. Several aspects of the evolution of that situation are analysed in this paper, reviewing also the implications in immunization programmes. Closely related with the analysis of this potential evolution, it will be very interesting to monitor the evolution of serogroup W in the African meningitis belt after implementation of the extensive immunization programme with serogroup A conjugate vaccine that is currently underway. More data about carriers, transmission, clonal lineages, etc. are needed for taking decisions (target groups, outbreak control, defining the extent, etc.) to adapt the response strategy with potential interventions with broad coverage vaccines against the emergent serogroup W.

Review Articles
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 


Dynamics of the Neisseria meningitidis serogroups

Neisseria meningitidis is defined as a bacterium which is part of the commensal flora of the human upper respiratory tract. However, some of the clonal lineages, can cause invasive disease, in both endemic and epidemic forms. Meningococci are capsulated bacteria. The antigenic properties of the capsular polysaccharide are the base of its classification into serogroups. Twelve serogroups are now universally recognized, but only six (A, B, C, W, Y, X) are associated with almost all clinical cases worldwide [Reference Harrison, Trotter and Ramsay1, Reference Sáfadi2]. Nevertheless, the epidemiology as well as the serogroup distribution is highly dynamic and changes in the prevalence of Y and X serogroups have been well documented worldwide in the last decades [Reference Harrison, Trotter and Ramsay1Reference Caugant5]. The monitoring, surveillance and study of the potential spread of those serogroups and how they could replace current serogroups is a major challenge in public health for the important implications for interventions with immunization programmes, etc.

Since 2000, similarly showing specific characteristics, serogroup W has been spreading. Several aspects of this evolution are analysed in this review, and potential implications for immunization programmes are reviewed.

Annual Hajj pilgrimages of 2000 and 2001: first international W meningococcal outbreak


Until 2000, serogroup W was associated with few sporadic cases of meningococcal disease worldwide [Reference Mayer6] and it was suggested that hypothetically this serogroup had little potential to cause invasive disease in either sporadic or small epidemics [Reference Griffiss and Brandt7].

Continuing with the history of the evolution of W strains, between 1991 and 1995 Kwara et al. [Reference Kwara8] analysed a small number of W strains isolated in The Gambia and Mali, two countries located in the African meningitis belt. The authors concluded that all strains were closely related, suggesting the potential of W isolates to cause epidemics in African countries. In addition, the authors showed a great ability to anticipate future epidemiological consequences from field observations concluding that W strains might have a great opportunity to spread at the time of the annual Hajj, considering the large number of pilgrims going to Saudi Arabia from countries in the African meningitis belt.

The Hajj 2000 international outbreak

An international emergency was reported following the annual Hajj season in Saudi Arabia in March 2000 [Reference Mayer6, Reference Popovic9], leading to secondary clusters in Muslim communities around the world as pilgrims returned to their countries of origin, demonstrating the epidemic potential of this serogroup [Reference Hahné10, Reference Taha11]. More than 400 W invasive cases were confirmed worldwide among pilgrims and their close contacts in at least 16 countries (Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Indonesia, Kuwait, Morocco, Norway, Oman, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Sweden, The Netherlands, UK, USA) [Reference Mayer6, Reference Popovic9] (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. World map showing the extent of known cases associated with serogroup W in countries reporting a significant proportion of cases and outbreaks.

Characterization of Hajj 2000-associated W strains

Different phenotypic and genotypic approaches were used to characterize the W strains isolated during the outbreak in an effort to determine the relationship between the different isolates and determine whether a single MenW clone was involved. Following this approach the Hajj 2000 outbreak was seen to be associated with W strains belonging to the sequence type (ST11)/electrophoretic type (ET37) clonal complex (ST11/ET37 CC), with very homogeneous phenotypic [serotype 2a, PorA variable region (VR) VR1-5, VR2-2] and genetic characteristics [Reference Mayer6]. An intensive analysis using several molecular markers [pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), multi-enzyme electrophoresis (MEE) or 16S rRNA gene sequencing] proved that the W strain associated with Hajj 2000 had been isolated in sporadic cases at least since 1970 in Africa and other continents [Reference Mayer6]. In addition, a W strain belonging to the ST11/ET37 CC was also isolated from a patient from Indonesia who had just returned from Hajj 1996, suggesting that this clone had been circulating and associated with sporadic cases during the Hajj before 2000 [Reference Popovic9].

Why was the strain circulating for years and potentially associated with the pilgrimage to Saudi Arabia before 2000 with no epidemiological relevance except sporadic cases? Did something change in the strains to improve their transmission capacities? Did something change in the environment or the host? There is no clear explanation to solve these questions and they will probably never be fully answered.

How did the situation evolve after Hajj 2000?

A significant number of W cases were reported towards the end of the 2001 epidemic season in Burkina Faso and Niger [Reference Taha12] and in January 2002 the first major epidemic of meningococcal disease caused by serogroup W began in Burkina Faso, with more than 12 000 cases and 1400 deaths [Reference Koumaré13], confirming the potential of W isolates to cause major epidemics in African countries as suggested by Kwara et al. in 1998 [Reference Kwara8] (Fig. 1).

This association with major epidemics suggests a high capability for transmission. In fact, consistent high levels of asymptomatic carriage of W ST11/ET37 strains (5·5% prevalence in children aged 5 years) were found in 1996 during a study in children in The Gambia [Reference MacLennan14] and also recently in Burkina Faso [Reference Kristiansen15], suggesting the capability for that clone both to persist and to be transmitted among susceptible populations. Wilder-Smith et al. [Reference Wilder16] found that 15% of returning pilgrims to Hajj 2000 carried a single W clone and 55% were still carriers 6 months later, emphasizing that W ST11/ET37 CC strains are highly transmissible and persistent, thus constituting a potential risk not only to their close contacts but also for the community in general. These data were later confirmed by Nicolas et al. in 2005 [Reference Nicolas17], who analysed carriage of this clone in pilgrims and their family contacts in Morocco, Oman and Sudan, with W strains persisting for several months. More recently, a study conducted in Turkey in pilgrims travelling to the Hajj shows an important prevalence of W strains among carriers (around 11%) before the trip and a significant percentage of acquisition of the epidemic strain W when they returned from the pilgrimage, also suggesting a high rate of transmission among their household contacts [Reference Ceyhan18]. The duration and high prevalence of serogroup W in carried strains might favour the dissemination to the population in general (not only to the household contacts), resulting in an increasingly wider reservoir.

Owing to the observed high persistence and transmissibility, new reports of the increase and spread of W strains have appeared in literature [Reference Caugant5, Reference Wilder-Smith, Chow and Goh19, Reference Parent du Châtelet, Barboza and Taha20]. In a recent study, W ST11/ET37 CC strains were identified in almost all the countries in the African meningitis belt from 2004 to 2010, mainly associated with sporadic cases and small epidemics [Reference Caugant5]. The W ST11/ET37 CC strains seemed to disappear from Burkina Faso after 2006 and the sporadic W isolates found in this country belonged to ST175 CC, which has not been associated with major epidemics and is responsible for endemic disease cases. However, W ST11/ET37 CC re-emerged in carriers as well as patients, after the country-wide mass vaccination with A conjugate vaccine [Reference Kristiansen15]. In Chad serogroup W strains became predominant during most of the period 2004–2008, where the strains belonged to either ST11/ET37 CC or ST175 CC. This shows the contribution of other CCs in serogroup W emergence in Africa and other geographical regions, suggesting the continuous emergence of new W genetic lineages [Reference Taha11]. An increased number of W cases was observed in Niger in 2010 and the isolates belonged to ST11/ET37 CC [Reference Collard21]. The study shows a continuous spread of W strains in the African meningitis belt. Whether the introduction of a new serogroup A conjugate vaccine (PsA-TT) [Reference Frasch, Preziosi and LaForce22] in a nationwide mass vaccination campaign in the African meningitis belt starting in Burkina Faso in December 2010 will have some effect in other non-A serogroup epidemic strains, particularly in W strains, is something to be evaluated in future studies. Looking at the current situation, during the first quarter of 2012 [23], alerts for meningococcal disease were reported in 10 countries of the African meningitis belt (Fig. 1). The outbreaks were mainly associated with W strains. In spite of tremendous success in controlling epidemics for serogroup A in the region [Reference Djingareya24, Reference Daugla25], enhanced surveillance needs to be maintained to monitor the evolution of serogroups in the region both in patients and in asymptomatic carriers. There is no evidence for serogroup replacement with serogroup C conjugate vaccines, but this is not demonstrated for other serogroups like A or W. Recent studies show a strong impact of MenAfriVac vaccination on serogroup A in carriers [Reference Kristiansen15, Reference Kristiansen26] and there is not yet strong evidence for serogroup replacement [Reference Kristiansen15], in either the disease or its carriers.

In South Africa, a country located outside the African meningitis belt, serogroup W was established as the predominant cause of endemic disease in 2008 [Reference von Gottberg27]. This situation currently looks rather stable [Reference von Gottberg28] and is associated with a high mortality rate. A similar situation, with serogroup W appearing as predominant and becoming endemic, has been observed in Saudi Arabia, where the tetravalent conjugate vaccine has been recommended in the National Immunization Schedule for children at the age of 9 months since 2012 [29] underlining the need for flexible and current public health interventions.

The travel of W strains to the South Cone in Latin America: spreading and becoming endemic in some countries

Although there have been no reports of serogroup W cases from Latin American countries associated with Hajj 2000 [Reference Mayer6, Reference Popovic9], this may be due to the absence of well-established surveillance for invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) in many countries in the region. A hypothetical association with the Muslim communities located in the region is no more than speculation because, as has been mentioned, there is no epidemiological information to establish that association. However, the emergence of serogroup W meningococcal cases has been observed in the South Cone (a geographical region composed of the southernmost areas of South America, south of the Tropic of Capricorn, including Argentina, Southern Brazil, Chile, Paraguay, Uruguay) in the last decade. This geographical area seems to be, for now, the last stage of the spread of serogroup W. The trends observed in the region suggest that serogroup W might become endemic in some countries of the region. This observation is a large change compared to with past situations (with serogroup W just associated with large epidemics or local outbreaks), highlighting the need to consider the inclusion of this serogroup in any vaccination strategy for the region.

Brazil: the first country with reports

An increase in the percentage of IMD cases associated with serogroup W has been evident in Rio Grande do Sul (incidence rate for IMD 1·5 × 105), in the south of Brazil, at least since 2004 [Reference Weidlich30], with increases of this serogroup also reported in Rio de Janeiro [Reference Barroso and Rebelo31]. In fact, in the South, W strains represented 3·2% during the period 1995–2003, rising to 17·8% in 2003–2005 [Reference López and Debbag32], the estimated current frequency of W for Brazil is 5·8% (incidence rate for IMD around 2 × 105). Although W strains are characterized as ST11/ET37 CC with similar phenotypic characteristics as the isolates associated with Hajj 2000 [Reference Weidlich30, Reference Lemos33], it has been suggested that they represent local isolates of ST11/ET37 CC rather than strains clearly evolving from those isolated during Hajj 2000, as described in some other countries [Reference Taha11, Reference Ferreira34]. An increased frequency of serogroup W in Brazil has been observed with no reduction in the total number of IMD cases over time, suggesting that the change in the percentage of serogroup W cases is not due simply to a decrease in cases by other serogroups.

Argentina: W strains become predominant

In Argentina, a country adjacent to Brazil, serogroup W represented less than 6% of the confirmed cases up to 2006, rising to 13% in 2007 and represented around 50% from 2008 onwards [Reference Ibarz-Pavón35]. In 2005 and 2006 an unexpected cluster of cases was observed in Misiones, a northern province on the border with Paraguay and Brazil, which might represent the beginning of the new situation. After that, clinical cases associated with W appeared mainly in the Buenos Aires province in 2007 and 2008, spreading to the rest of the country later [Reference Efron36]. Preliminary and limited data showed those W strains isolated in Argentina as belonging to ST11/ET37 CC with similar characteristics to those found for the Hajj 2000 strains [Reference Efron37]. A recent report by Sorhouet-Pereira et al. [Reference Sorhouet-Pereira38] confirmed the presence and prevalence of the epidemic clone W:2a:P1·5,2:ST11 in the country, but the molecular characterization is insufficient to determine whether the situation is similar to that found in Brazil, with local isolates belonging to the same epidemic clone or whether the Argentinean strains are closely related to the Hajj 2000 outbreak strain. This distinction is important as it may lead to the conclusion either that we are observing the emergence of W ST11 CC strains in different geographical areas, or that the Hajj 2000 strains are still spreading globally. In Argentina the incidence rate of IMD has been around 0·6/100 000 inhabitants from 2005 to date [Reference Sorhouet-Pereira38]. Thus, the increase proportion of W strains is not associated with increases in the number of cases of IMD in this country, but it is presumably not an artefact due to a decrease in the number of cases related to other serogroups.

Chile: increases in percentages, incidence and mortality rates

Some increases in the percentage of W were also observed in 2009 and 2010 in Uruguay, Paraguay and Chile [Reference Ibarz-Pavón35], all located in the South Cone in Latin America. Trends observed in Chile were recently confirmed with a large increase in the number of W cases in 2011 and particularly in 2012 reported by the Ministry of Health and an increase in the mortality rate, to 25% in cases associated with W [Reference López and Debbag32, 39]. The increase was particularly important in children aged < 5 years [Reference Barra40] but was significant in all age groups. In light of a higher percentage of W cases also associated with an increase in the incidence rate of IMD (0·8 × 105 in 2012 compared with 0·4 in 2011 or 0·5 in 2010), particularly in and around the capital city, the tetravalent (A + C + Y + WW) conjugate vaccine was administered throughout the country from the end of 2012, with children aged between 9 months and 4 years the target population [41]; this intervention achieved a high coverage. The immunization programme is still ongoing with new cohorts being vaccinated. Eighty-seven cases of IMD associated with serogroup W were reported in Chile in 2013 and there were only two cases in the vaccinated age group corresponding to two children who did not receive the vaccine [42]. The number of W cases in 2013 is significantly higher than in 2012 when 60 W cases were reported, suggesting that other age groups should be targeted for new interventions with tetravalent vaccines in order to exercise control on the situation, as we learned in the past with the use of C conjugate vaccines [Reference Cohn and Harrison43]. In this sense, a carrier survey including more than 4000 subjects aged between 11 and 19 years was performed in the country and the data will be very useful for implementing strategies for immunization in the future [44]. The molecular characterization of a limited number of W strains isolated in Chile during 2010 and 2011 shows that most of the W strains belong to ST11/ET37 CC [Reference Barra40], but other CCs are also appearing, particularly in 2011. Those additional CCs identified in 2011 were those usually associated with serogroup B strains, suggesting the possibility of switching events in the meningococcal population in Chile. A recent report [45] shows that there were nine different band patterns after analysis of DNA by PFGE in 37 W strains (with 57% belonging to only one band pattern profile), with a similar level of variability to that previously observed for the ST11/ET37 clonal lineage [Reference Taha11]. These data suggest a continuous diversification of the W ST11/ET37 CC with new variants being associated with clinical cases. It is very important to monitor the evolution of the situation carefully not only in terms of the efficacy of the intervention but also analysing the immune response (magnitude, duration), etc. This experience will be very useful to confront potential similar situations in the future in other countries.

Tracking the expansion of W strains: molecular characterization

As mentioned elsewhere in this review, many studies have been made characterizing W isolates both phenotypically and genetically in an effort to get a better understanding of the evolution, not only of serogroup W but particularly of those strains belonging to ST11/ET37 CC (Table 1). Genetic drift should be driving the evolution of the Hajj-related strains after the 2000 outbreak. High rates of W strains in carriers and persistence among them allows the W strains to evolve and, emerging genetic variants hinder analysis of the evolution of the epidemic strains. In this sense fine characterization of W isolates is critical for tracking their spread and following the evolution.

Table 1. Methods used for characterization of W strains in different studies found in the literature

MLST, Multi-locus sequence type; CC, clonal complex; MEE, multi-enzyme electrophoresis; PFGE, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis; MLDF, multi-locus DNA fragment typing;

WGS, whole genome sequence.

* Reference according to the numbers used in this paper.

However, the level of characterization already used in different studies is rather heterogeneous and it is difficult to compare findings among them (Table 1). Most of the authors define at least the genosubtype (PorA variable regions) and sequence type; then all strains characterized as P1·5,2 belonging to the ST11/ET37 CC are referred to as Hajj 2000 or closely related strains [Reference Efron37, Reference Sorhouet-Pereira38, Reference Barra40, Reference Taha46]. However, the inclusion of additional markers shows that several genetically related subgroups are present in W ST11/ET37 CC, suggesting that fine characterization is needed to fully understand trends in transmission and spread [Reference Harrison, Trotter and Ramsay1, Reference Caugant5, Reference Taha11]. Only Mayer et al. in 2002 [Reference Mayer6] compared the use of two phenotypic (serotyping and serosubtyping) and six molecular markers [16S, PFGE, MEE, VR-1 VR-2, multi-locus sequence typing (MLST), multi-locus DNA fragment typing (MLDF)] for characterization of W strains, defining sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for all molecular subtyping methods for identifying the Hajj outbreak-associated strains. The authors concluded that 16S sequencing, PFGE, and MEE provided the best specificity (98%, 86%, 80%, respectively) and PPV (96%, 79%, 72%, respectively), and a combination of PFGE and MEE resulted in a specificity of 90% and a PPV of 84%. The sequence of fetA variable region has also been used later, but there is no specific analysis of its specificity and/or PPV values [Reference Efron37, Reference Taha47]. Some authors have shown that other genetic lineages among W strains (ST2495 and ST22) might be expanding, contributing to the genetic diversification of the meningococci associated with serogroup W [Reference Taha11]. N. meningitidis is subject to horizontal DNA transfer and re-assortment of genes between different strains producing genetic variants. Therefore, characterization of invasive meningococcal strains by several fine molecular typing approaches is essential to monitor and understand the evolution of the situation. As an example, there was a cluster of W cases in southeastern Florida [Reference Doyle48], in which the authors used PFGE and MLST for characterization of the isolates (7/12), with all W strains belonging to ST11 CC with an indistinguishable (or closely related) band pattern profile by PFGE. With this microbiological information the authors suggest that ‘The dominant clonal complex observed in the Florida cluster matches the dominant type recently observed in Argentina and Brazil, raising the possibility of introduction to Southeastern Florida from South America.’ However, at that time there was no information about PFGE patterns in W strains isolated in the South Cone in Latin America, so we only know that the strains isolated in both Florida and the South Cone belonged to ST11 CC which is not enough to support the suggestion. A minimal consensus about what molecular markers should be used might help to be able to compare definitely different findings in different geographical areas and reach a conclusion as to whether we are observing the emergence of W ST11 CC strains in different geographical areas or, on the contrary, the Hajj 2000 strains are still spreading globally.

W ST11/ET37 CC strains: where do they come from?

Because of the sporadic isolation of ST11/ET37 W strains in different geographical locations and years, it has been suggested that the 2000 outbreak associated with the Hajj might have been the result of spreading of a pre-existing, although not well known, W ST11/ET37 CC strain, after an amplification effect possibly enhanced by favourable environmental circumstances [Reference Mayer6], rather than emergence of a new W strain.

Immunological pressure might have had an important role in this history. The annual Muslim pilgrimage to Saudi Arabia had been previously associated with outbreaks of meningococcal disease in returning pilgrims [Reference Jones and Sutcliffe49]. After the first pandemic of meningococcal serogroup A infection during Hajj 1987, Saudi Arabian authorities required vaccination with a bivalent serogroups A+C vaccine for all pilgrims arriving in the country [Reference Al-Gahtani50]. Since the mid-1990s, because of that visa requirement for all pilgrims entering the country, millions of doses mainly of meningococcal A + C polysaccharide vaccine have been administered (although some countries were using the quadrivalent meningococcal A + C + W135 + Y polysaccharide vaccine), allthough those A + C polysaccharide vaccines offer no protection from W strains. Since 2002 the quadrivalent meningococcal vaccine (A + C + Y + W) has been required to obtain the Hajj visa.

Similarities in both molecular and phenotypic markers have been suggested when comparing W with serogroup C strains, both belonging to ST11/ET37 CC [Reference Mayer6, Reference Wang51]. In addition to being a member of the ST11/ET37 complex, additional molecular and phenotypic markers of this W clone are very similar to those of serogroup C strains of the ST11/ET37 complex that are associated with outbreaks and sporadic cases of meningococcal disease. The question is whether W ST11/ET37 CC strains have derived from serogroup C strains of the same CC through a capsular-switching event, often described in meningococcal strains involving different serogroups [Reference Castilla52] or both W and C ST11/ET37 CC represent two separate and distinct evolutionary lines with a distant common ancestor that subsequently differentiated into different serogroups. The data already discussed in this review and presented in several studies show that an increasing numbers of W strains were reported in Saudi Arabia every year from 1990 to 2000 [Reference Mayer6, Reference Wang51] suggesting some circulation of W strains before Hajj 2000. This finding is confirmed by the isolation of a similar W strain in a patient from Indonesia who was a pilgrim returning from the 1996 Hajj. Additionally, very similar strains have been recovered worldwide at least since 1970 [Reference Mayer6], suggesting that the hypothetical capsular-switching event (from C to W or in the opposite direction) took place possibly before 1970 [Reference Mayer6].

Carriers, transmission and persistence data already commented upon in this review [Reference MacLennan14Reference Ceyhan18, Reference Daugla25, Reference Kristiansen26] might indicate that W ST11/ET37 CC strains appear to be significantly more transmissible than C ST11/ET37 CC isolates and it has been suggested that the modification of this capability might be related to the serogroup switch [Reference Kristiansen26]. However, this different characteristic might also suggest that in fact W and C ST11/ET37 CC represent two separate and distinct evolutionary lines among the ST11/ET37 CC.

The question then is whether this clone has the potential to settle in the population maintaining adequate rates of transmission to be associated with endemic or epidemic situations or whether the situation at the beginning of this century is a one-off and temporary. A recent report shows recent transmission of W ST11/ET37 CC in southeastern China [Reference Zhou54], suggesting that the strains might be still globally spreading. The global distribution of reports of W increases is shown in Figure 1 and it might only reflect part of the extension of serogroup W, and those geographical areas with no apparent effect could be associated with poor surveillance systems. How this situation evolve in the next future is one of the most important topics for those people involved in prevention and control of meningococcal disease worldwide.


In the light of the data found in the literature it can be concluded that:

  • Serogroup W has been emergent during the current century, with strains belonging to ST11/ET37 CC being most prevalent among the serogroup. However, genetic variants and other clonal lineages might be contributing to the emergence.

  • The outbreak in 2000 associated with W strains appears to have triggered off that trend, contributing to the spread of W ST11/ET37 CC strains globally. However, local strains might be also responsible for the increased percentage of this serogroup.

  • An unexpected increase in the percentage of W has been observed in different countries located in the South Cone in Latin America. W ST11/ET37 CC strains now appear as endemic in the region and a large immunization programme with tetravalent conjugate vaccine has been implemented in Chile.

  • It will be very interesting to monitor the evolution of serogroup W in the African meningitis belt after the implementation of an extensive immunization programme with serogroup A conjugate vaccine, and also trends in serogroup distribution in Chile after administration of the conjugate tetravalent vaccine. Reinforced surveillance is needed to evaluate potential future interventions with broad coverage vaccines against the emergent serogroup W.


R.D. is employed by Sanofi-Pasteur; J.A.V. received grants for research from Sanofi-Pasteur, Novartis Vaccines, GlaxoSmithKline and Pfizer.


1. Harrison, LH, Trotter, CL, Ramsay, ME. Global epidemiology of meningococcal disease. Vaccine 2009; 27 (Suppl. 2): B51B63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Sáfadi, MA, et al. The epidemiology of meningococcal disease in Latin America 1945–2010: an unpredictable and changing landscape. Epidemiology and Infection 2012; 9: 112.Google Scholar
3. Abad, R, et al. Molecular characterization of invasive serogroup Y Neisseria meningitidis strains isolated in the Latin America region. Journal of Infection 2009; 59: 104114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Bröker, M, et al. Increase of meningococcal serogroup Y cases in Europe: a reason for concern? Human Vaccines and Immunotherapeutics 2012; 8: 685688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Caugant, DA, et al. (2012). Molecular characterization of invasive meningococcal isolates from countries in the African meningitis belt before introduction of a serogroup A conjugate vaccine. PLoS One 2012; 7: e46 019.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Mayer, LW, et al. Outbreak of W meningococcal disease in 2000: not emergence of a new W strain but clonal expansion within the electrophoretic type-37 complex. Journal of Infectious Diseases 2002; 185: 15961605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Griffiss, JM, Brandt, BL. Disease due to serogroup W Neisseria meningitidis . Pediatrics 1979; 64: 218221.Google Scholar
8. Kwara, A, et al. Meningitis caused by a serogroup W clone of the ET37 complex of Neisseria meningitidis in West Africa. Tropical Medicine and International Health 1998; 3: 742746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Popovic, T, et al. Neisseria meningitidis serogroup W isolates associated with the ET37 complex. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2000; 6: 428429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Hahné, SJ, et al. W meningococcal disease in England and Wales associated with Hajj 2000 and 2001. Lancet 2002; 359: 582583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Taha, MK, et al. Continuing diversification of Neisseria meningitidis W as a primary cause of meningococcal disease after emergence of the serogroup in 2000. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2004; 42: 41584163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Taha, MK, et al. Neisseria meningitidis serogroups W and A were equally prevalent among meningitis cases occurring at the end of the 2001 epidemics in Burkina Faso and Niger. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2002; 40: 10831084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Koumaré, B, et al. The first large epidemic of meningococcal disease caused by serogroup W, Burkina Faso, 2002. Vaccine 2007; 25 (Suppl. 1), A3741.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. MacLennan, JM, et al. Carriage of serogroup W, ET37 meningococci in the Gambia: implications for immunisation policy. Lancet 2000; 356: 1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Kristiansen, PA, et al. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of meningococcal carriage and disease isolates in Burkina Faso after mass vaccination with a serogroup a conjugate vaccine. BMC Infectious Diseases 2013; 13: 363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Wilder, Smith A, et al. Persistence of W Neisseria meningitidis carriage in returning Hajj pilgrims: risk for early and late transmission to household contacts. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2003; 9: 123126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Nicolas, P, et al. Pharyngeal carriage of serogroup W Neisseria meningitidis in Hajjees and their family contacts in Morocco, Oman and Sudan. APMIS 2005; 113: 182186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Ceyhan, M, et al. Acquisition of meningococcal serogroup W-135 carriage in Turkish Hajj pilgrims who had received the quadrivalent meningococcal polysaccharide vaccine. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology 2013; 20: 6668.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Wilder-Smith, A, Chow, A, Goh, KT. Emergence and disappearance of W meningococcal disease. Epidemiology & Infection 2009; 138: 976978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Parent du Châtelet, I, Barboza, P, Taha, MK. W invasive meningococcal infections imported from Sub-Saharan Africa to France, January to April 2012. Eurosurveillance 2012; 17: pii=20181.Google ScholarPubMed
21. Collard, JM, et al. Increase in Neisseria meningitidis serogroup W, Niger, 2010. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2010; 16: 14961498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22. Frasch, CE, Preziosi, MP, LaForce, FM. Development of a group A meningococcal conjugate vaccine, MenAfriVac™. Human Vaccines and Immunotherapeutics 2012; 8: 715724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. World Health Organization. Meningococcal disease: situation in the African Meningitis Belt ( Accessed 28 July 2013 Google Scholar
24. Djingareya, MH, et al. Effectively introducing a new meningococcal A conjugate vaccine in Africa: The Burkina Faso experience. Vaccine 2012; 30 (Suppl. 2): B40B45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Daugla, DM, et al. Effect of a serogroup A meningococcal conjugate vaccine (PsA-TT) on serogroup A meningococcal meningitis and carriage in Chad: a community trial. Lancet. Published online 11 September 2013 . doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61612-8.Google Scholar
26. Kristiansen, PA, et al. Impact of the serogroup A meningococcal conjugate vaccine, MenAfriVac, on carriage and herd immunity. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2013; 56: 354363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27. von Gottberg, A. Neisseria meningitidis . Communicable Diseases Surveillance Bulletin 2012; 10: 6063.Google Scholar
28. von Gottberg, A, et al. Emergence of endemic serogroup W meningococcal disease associated with a high mortality rate in South Africa. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2008; 46: 377386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29. Ministry of Health Portal. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Basic vaccination schedule ( Accessed 26 July 2013.Google Scholar
30. Weidlich, L et al. High prevalence of Neisseria meningitidis hypervirulent lineages and emergence of W:P1·5,2:ST11 clone in Southern Brazil. Journal of Infection 2008; 57: 324331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31. Barroso, DE, Rebelo, MC. Recognition of the epidemiological significance of Neisseria meningitidis capsular serogroup W in the Rio de Janeiro region, Brazil. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 2007; 102: 773775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32. López, EL, Debbag, R. Meningococcal disease: always present. Serogroup changes in the Southern Cone. Revista Chilena de Infectología 2012; 29: 587594.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33. Lemos, AP, et al. Phenotypic and molecular characterization of invasive serogroup W Neisseria meningitidis strains from 1990 to 2005 in Brazil. Journal of Infection 2009; 60: 209217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34. Ferreira, E, et al. Neisseria meningitidis serogroup W in Portugal – presence of the ST11/ET37 clonal complex. Pathologie Biologie 2007; 56: 94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35. Ibarz-Pavón, AB, et al. Laboratory-based surveillance of Neisseria meningitidis isolates from disease cases in Latin American and Caribbean countries, SIREVA II 2006–2010. PLoS One 2012; 7: e 44 102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36. Efron, AM, et al. Significant increase of serogroup W invasive Neisseria meningitidis strains in Argentina: a new epidemiological feature on the region. Sixteenth International Pathogenic Conference 2008, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. P-169. ( Accessed 28 July 2013.Google Scholar
37. Efron, AM, et al. W invasive meningococcal strains spreading in South America: significant increase in incidence rate in Argentina. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2009; 47: 19791980.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38. Sorhouet-Pereira, C, et al. Phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of Neisseria meningitidis disease-causing strains in Argentina, 2010. PLoS One 2013; 8: e 58 065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39. Ministerio Salud Pública Republica de Chile. Situation of meningococcal disease caused by serogroup W ( Accessed 26 July 2013.Google Scholar
40. Barra, GN, et al. Molecular characterization of invasive Neisseria meningitidis strains isolated in Chile during 2010–2011. PLoS One 2013; 8: e 66 006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41. Ministerio Salud Pública Republica de Chile. Action Plan W ( Accessed 26 July 2013.Google Scholar
42. Ministerio Salud Pública Republica de Chile. Meningococcal disease (CIE-10: A39). Epidemiological situation, January–December, 2013. Action Plan W-135 ( Accessed 22 January 2014.Google Scholar
43. Cohn, AC, Harrison, LH. Meningococcal vaccines: current issues and future strategies. Drugs 2013; 73: 11471155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
44. Ministerio Salud Pública Republica de Chile. Research on carriage of Neisseria meningitidis ( Accessed 22 January 2014.Google Scholar
45. Instituto de Salud Pública de Chile. Report of the results of laboratory surveillance. invasive disease. Neisseria meningitidis 2012. ( Accessed 26 July 2013.Google ScholarPubMed
46. Taha, MK, et al. Serogroup W meningococcal disease in Hajj pilgrims. Lancet 2000; 356: 2159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
47. Taha, MK, et al. Travel-related Neisseria meningitidis serogroup W135 infection, France. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2013; 19: 10301032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
48. Doyle, TJ, et al. Cluster of serogroup W135 meningococci, southeastern Florida, 2008–2009. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2010; 16: 113115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
49. Jones, DM, Sutcliffe, EM. Group A meningococcal disease in England associated with the Hajj. Journal of Infection 1990; 21: 2125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
50. Al-Gahtani, YM, et al. Epidemiological investigation of an outbreak of meningococcal meningitis in Makkah (Mecca), Saudi-Arabia, 1992. Epidemiology & Infection 1995; 115: 399409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
51. Wang, JF, et al. Antigenic and epidemiologic properties of the ET37 complex of Neisseria meningitidis . Journal of Infectious Diseases 1993; 167: 13201329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
52. Castilla, J, et al. B:2a:P1·5 meningococcal strains likely arisen from capsular switching event still spreading in Spain. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2009; 47: 463465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
53. du Plessis, M, et al. Whole genome resolution of selected Neisseria meningitidis serogroup W strains, South Africa, 2003–2012. 12th EMGM 2013, Bad Loipersdorf, Austria. P-097 ( Accessed 28 July 2013.Google Scholar
54. Zhou, H, et al. Spread of Neisseria meningitidis serogroup W clone, China. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2013; 19: 1496–1469.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 53
Total number of PDF views: 291 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd January 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Hostname: page-component-76cb886bbf-frjnl Total loading time: 0.574 Render date: 2021-01-22T14:15:46.157Z Query parameters: { "hasAccess": "1", "openAccess": "0", "isLogged": "0", "lang": "en" } Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false }

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Serogroup W meningococcal disease: global spread and current affect on the Southern Cone in Latin America
Available formats

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Serogroup W meningococcal disease: global spread and current affect on the Southern Cone in Latin America
Available formats

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Serogroup W meningococcal disease: global spread and current affect on the Southern Cone in Latin America
Available formats

Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *