Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T11:57:55.667Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Seroepidemiology of diphtheria and pertussis in Luxembourg in 2000

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2005

J. MOSSONG
Affiliation:
Laboratoire National de Santé, Luxembourg CRP–Santé, Luxembourg
L. PUTZ
Affiliation:
Laboratoire National de Santé, Luxembourg CRP–Santé, Luxembourg
Z. SHKEDY
Affiliation:
Centre for Statistics, Limburgs Universitair Centrum, Diepenbeek, Belgium
F. SCHNEIDER
Affiliation:
Laboratoire National de Santé, Luxembourg
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A large serosurvey was carried out in Luxembourg in 2000–2001, to determine the population immunity against a number of vaccine-preventable infections including diphtheria and pertussis. Immunity to diphtheria and pertussis was assessed using an in-house neutralization assay and a commercial ELISA test respectively. Mean pertussis antibody activity decreased from 4 to 8 years of age, reflecting the effects of waning of vaccine-induced immunity. Mean pertussis antibody activity increased during adolescence due to infection in previously vaccinated individuals and levelled out after approximately 20 years of age. For adults >25 years age, a statistically significant 30% difference in mean antibody activity between men and women was observed. The proportion of seronegatives for diphtheria among children and adolescents aged <20 years was 2·5% reflecting the high vaccination coverage. The proportion seronegative for diphtheria tended to increase with age such that 42% of individuals aged >40 years were seronegative. Our study supports the recently introduced acellular pertussis vaccine booster at 6 years to reduce pertussis transmission in school-aged children and adolescents.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2005 Cambridge University Press