Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T06:03:55.757Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Salmonella infection in chicks following the consumption of artificially contaminated feed

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

M. Hinton
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bristol, Langford House, Langford, Avon HS18 7DU, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Poultry feed was contaminated artificially with either Salmonella kedougou or S. livingstone using a two-stage mixing process. Intestinal infection became established in a small proportion of birds when feed containing between 0·1 and 0·3 salmonellas/g was given continuously for 2 or 3 weeks from the day of their purchase as ‘day-olds’ while nearly all birds became infected when the feed contained 100–300 salmonellas/g. Between these limits a dose response was demonstrated in that the proportion of birds becoming colonized with salmonellas increased as the numbers of salmoncllas added to feed was increased.

Nalidixic acid-resistant strains of both serotypes were used to facilitate the recovery of organisms. The isolation rate was higher from dilutions of euccal contents inoculated directly onto brilliant green agar supplemented with nalidixic acid than it was from swabs of cloacal faeces, even when an enrichment technique was used. This observation confirms that the incidence of salmonella carriage in flocks will be under-estimated if only cloacal faeces are cultured.

Of the two serotypes used S. kedougou proved the more efficient colonizer although for both scrotypes variation in infection rates was demonstrated in different groups of birds given feed containing comparable numbers of salmoncllas.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

References

REFERENCES

Barnes, E. M., Mead, G. C., Barnum, D. A. & Harry, E. G. (1972). The intestinal flora of the chicken in the period 2 to 6 weeks of age, with particular reference to the anaerobic bacteria. British Poultry Science 13, 311320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, N. A., Bailey, J. S. & Thomson, J. E. (1982). Evaluation of procedures to disperse inoculated Salmonella in poultry feeds. Poultry Science 61, 382384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hinton, M. (1986). The artificial contamination of poultry feed with Salmonella and its infectivity for young chickens. Letters in Applied Microbiology 3, 9799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinton, M., Al-Chalaby, Z. A. M. & Linton, A. H. (1986). The influence of dietary protein and antimicrobial feed additives on salmonella carriage by broiler chickens. Veterinary Record 119, 495500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hinton, M., Lim, S. K. & Linton, A. H. (1987). The influence of antibacterial agents on the complexity of the Escherichia coli flora of chickens. FEMS Microbiology Letters 41, 169173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Impey, C. S., Mead, G. C. & Hinton, M. (1987). Influence of continuous challenge via the feed on competitive exclusion of salmonellas from broiler chicks. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 63, 139146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linton, A. H., Al-Chalaby, Z. A. M. & Hinton, M. (1985). Natural subclinical salmonella infection in chickens: A potential model for testing the effects of various procedures on salmonella shedding. Veterinary Record 116, 361364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mead, G. C. & Impey, C. S. (1986). Current progress in reducing salmonella colonization of poultry by ‘competitive exclusion’. Journal of Applied Bacteriology Symposium Supplement 1986, 67S75S.Google ScholarPubMed
Milner, K. C. & Shaffer, M. F. (1952). Bacteriologic studies of experimental salmonella infections in chicks. Journal of Infectious Diseases 90, 8196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sadler, W. W., Bhownell, J. R. & Fanelli, M. J. (1969). Influence of ago and inoculum level on shed pattern of Salmonella typhimurium in chickens. Avian Diseases 13, 793803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schleifer, J. H., Juven, B. J., Beard, C. W. & Cox, N. A. (1984). The susceptibility of chicks to Salmonella montevideo in artificially contaminated poultry feed. Avian Diseases 28, 497503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snoeyenbos, G. H., Calson, V. L., Smyser, C. F. & Olesiuk, D. M. (1969). Dynamics of salmonella infection in chicks reared on litter. Avian Diseases 13, 7283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, J. E. (1981). Salmonellas in poultry feeds-a world-wide review. World's Poultry Science Journal 37, 619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar