Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-12T09:01:33.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The role of wild animals, other than buffalo, in the current epidemiology of foot-and-mouth disease in Zimbabwe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

E. C. Anderson ,
C. Foggin ,
M. Atkinson ,
K. J. Sorensen ,
R. L. Madekurozva  and
J. Nqindi
E. C. Anderson
Affiliation:
Wildlife UnitPO Box 8101, Causeway, Harare, Zimbabwe
C. Foggin
Affiliation:
Wildlife UnitPO Box 8101, Causeway, Harare, Zimbabwe
M. Atkinson
Affiliation:
Wildlife UnitPO Box 8101, Causeway, Harare, Zimbabwe
K. J. Sorensen
Affiliation:
Virology Section, Veterinary Research Laboratory, PO Box 8101, Causeway, Harare, Zimbabwe
R. L. Madekurozva
Affiliation:
Virology Section, Veterinary Research Laboratory, PO Box 8101, Causeway, Harare, Zimbabwe
J. Nqindi
Affiliation:
Virology Section, Veterinary Research Laboratory, PO Box 8101, Causeway, Harare, Zimbabwe
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Between 1989 and 1992, 7970 wild ungulates, comprising 14 different species, were tested for antibodies to types SAT 1, SAT 2 and SAT 3 foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) virus. Of these 1·2% were found to be positive and these included impala (Aepyceros melampus), eland (Taurotragus oryx), waterbuck (Kobus ellipsiprymnus) and sable (Hippotragus niger). All the positive animals were either from the wildlife areas where buffalo (Syncerus caffer) occur or from ranches where clinical FMD had occurred in cattle. The role of these animal species in the current epidemiology of FMD in Zimbabwe is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Epidemiology & Infection , Volume 111 , Issue 3 , December 1993 , pp. 559 - 564
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

References

1.Sorensen, KJ, Madekurozwa, RL, Dawe, P. Foot and Mouth disease: detection of antibodies in cattle sera by blocking ELISA. Vet Microbiol 1992; 32: 253–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Condy, JB, Herniman, KAJ, Hedger, RS. Foot and Mouth disease in wildlife in Rhodesia and other African territories – a serological survey. J Comp Pathol 1969; 79: 27–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Hedger, RS, Condy, JB, Golding, SM. Infection of some species of African wildlife with Foot and Mouth disease virus. J Comp Pathol 1972; 82: 455–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Anderson, EC. Anderson, J, Doughty, WJ, Drevmo, S. The pathogenicity of bovine strains of Foot and Mouth disease virus for impala and wildebeest. J Wildlife Dis 1975; 11: 248–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Ferris, NP, Condy, JB, Barnett, ITR, Armstrong, RM. Experimental infection of eland, sable and buffalo with Foot and Mouth disease virus. J Comp Pathol 1989; 101: 307–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Paling, RW, Jessett, DM, Heath, BR. The occurrence of infectious diseases in mixed farming of domesticated wild herbivores, including camels, in Kenya. I. Viral diseases. A serological survey with special reference to Foot and Mouth disease. J Wildlife Dis 1979; 15: 351–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Thomson, GR, Bengis, RG, Esterhuysen, JJ, Pini, A. Maintenance mechanisms for Foot and Mouth disease virus in the Kruger National Park and potential avenues for its escape into domestic animal populations. Proceedings XIIIth World Congress on Diseases of Cattle, Durban. Republic of South Africa. 17–21 Sept 1984: 33–8.Google Scholar
8.Vosloo, W, Knowles, NJ, Thomson, GR. Genetic relationships between southern Africa SAT 2 isolates of foot-and-mouth virus. Epidemiol Infect 1992; 109: 547–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar