Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T19:02:44.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A preliminary study of the bacteriophages of Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Phyllis A. Don  and
M. van den Ende
Phyllis A. Don
Affiliation:
From the Department of Pathology, University of Cape Town
M. van den Ende
Affiliation:
From the Department of Pathology, University of Cape Town
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Thirty strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, isolated from routine clinical material, were investigated, with particular reference to the metallic lytic effect and the bacteriophages they carry. From the filtrates of these strains, twenty-five bacteriophages or phage variants were isolated, and the effect of these on the various bacterial strains and some of their variants were investigated.

It has not been possible to elucidate the nature of the agent responsible for the metallic lytic effect. The true phages isolated, however, present many features of interest which warrant their more detailed study.

Part of this work was carried out in the Nkana Kitwe and C.S.I.R. virus research unit at the U.C.T. Pathology Department.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 48 , Issue 2 , June 1950 , pp. 196 - 214
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1950

References

REFERENCES

Asheshov, I. (1926). C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 95, 1029.Google Scholar
Conge, G. (1948). Ann. Inst. Pasteur, 75, 368.Google Scholar
Delbrück, H. (1939). J. gen. Physiol. 23, 643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Herelle, F. (1926). The Bacteriophage and its Behaviour. Trans. by Smith, G. H.. London: Bailliére, Tindall and Cox.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, L. (1948). J. gen. Microbiol. 2, 154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fastier, L. B. (1945). J. Bact. 50, 301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisk, R. T. (1942). J. infect. Dis. 71, 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaby, W. L. (1946). J. Bact. 51, 217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gessard, C. (1919). Ann. Inst. Pasteur, 33, 241.Google Scholar
Gessard, C. (1919). C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 82, 795.Google Scholar
Hadley, P. (1924). J. infect. Dis. 34, 260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadley, P. (1927). J. infect. Dis. 40, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jadin, J. (1932). C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 109, 556.Google Scholar
Linz, R. (1938). C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 129, 24.Google Scholar
Luria, S. E. & Dulbecco, R. (1949). Genetics, 34, 93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meader, P. D. et al. (1925). Amer. J. Hyg. 5, 682.Google Scholar
Rabinowitz, G. (1934). J. Bact. 28, 221, 237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, G. S. & Atkinson, J. D. (1945). Lancet, 1, 647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar