Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wp2c8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T05:45:59.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Relation of the Antitoxin to the Globulin-Content of the Blood Serum during Diphtheria Immunisation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

J. C. G. Ledingham
J. C. G. Ledingham
Affiliation:
Assistant Bacteriologist, Lister Institute of Preventive Medicine.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. During the immunisation of a horse which ultimately failed to yield high grade antitoxic serum, the globulin-content of the total proteid showed no tendency to increase. The slight rise in total proteid which occurred was due to an increase in the albumin fraction. It is probable that the failure of this horse to yield high grade antitoxin was in some way connected with the initial high globulin-content of the serum.

2. During the immunisation of a goat, the rise in total proteid affected mainly the albumin fraction and the globulin fraction in lesser degree.

3. During the immunisation of a horse which ultimately yielded high grade antitoxic serum, the percentage globulin-content of the total proteid, progressively increased. This increase affected the euglobulin fraction more than the pseudoglobulin fraction.

4. In the horse the pseudoglobulin contains the greater part if not all the antitoxin but it seems probable that this relationship holds good only when the antitoxin-content of the serum is steadily rising.

5. In the goat the antitoxin-content of the euglobulin and pseudoglobulin fractions may vary at different periods in the course of immunisation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , January 1907 , pp. 65 - 91
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1907

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Aronson, (1893). “Experimentelle Untersuchungen über Diphtherie u. die immunisierende Substanz des Blutserums.” Berl. klin. Wochenschr. No. 26, p. 425.Google Scholar
Belfanti, and Carbone, (1898). “Contributo alla conoscenza dell' antitossina difterica.” Archivio per le scienze mediche, Vol. xxii. No. 2 [ref. Centr. f. Bakt. xxiii. p. 906].Google Scholar
Brodie, (1897). “A preliminary report of some experiments upon the chemistry of the Diphtheria-antitoxin.” Journ. of Pathol. and Bacteriol., Vol. iv. p. 460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burckhardt, (1883). “Beiträge zur Chemie u. Physiologie des Blutserums.” Archiv f. exp. Path. u. Ther. Bd. xvi. p. 322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butjagin, (1902). “Ueber die Veränderungen des Blutes der gegen Diphtherie immunisierten Pferde.” Hyg. Rundschau, No. 12, p. 1193.Google Scholar
Dieudonné, . Ergebnisse der Sammelforschung über das Diphtherieheilserum für die Zeit vom Apr. 1895 bis März 1896, and “Ueber diphtheriegiftneutralisierende Wirkungen der Serumglobuline.” Arbeit. a. d. Kaiserl. Gesundheitsamt, xiii. p. 293.Google Scholar
Fuld, and Spiro, (1900). “Ueber die labende u. labhemmende Wirkung des Blutes.” Zeitschr. f. physiol. Chem. Bd. xxxi. p. 132.Google Scholar
Freund, and Joachim, (1902). “Zur Kenntniss der Serumglobuline.” Zeitschr. f. physiol. Chem. Bd. xxxvi. p. 407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freund, and Sternberg, (1899). “Ueber Darstellung des Heilkörpers aus dem Diphtherieheilserum.” Zeitschr. f. Hyg. Bd. xxxi. p. 429.Google Scholar
Githens, (1904). “Der Einfluss von Nahrungs- u. Blutentziehung auf die Zusammensetzung des Blutplasmas.” Hofmeister's Beitrüge, Bd. v. p. 515.Google Scholar
Glässner, (1905). “Ueber das Verhalten des Blutglobulins beim Immunisierungsvorgange.” Zeitschr. f. exp. Path. u. Ther. Bd. ii. H. i. p. 154.Google Scholar
Hiss, and Atkinson, (1901). “Serum-globulin and Diphtheric Antitoxin, etc.” Journ. of Exp. Med. Vol. v. p. 47.Google Scholar
Joachim, (1903). “Ueber die Eiweissvertheilung in menschlichen u. thierischen Körperflüssigkeiten.” Arch. f. d. ges. Phys. Bd. xciii. p. 558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langstein, and Mayer, (1904). “Ueber das Verhalten der Eiweisskörper des Blutplasmas bei experimentellen Infectionen.” Hofmeister's Beiträge, Bd. v.Google Scholar
Marcus, (1899). “Ueber in Wasser lösliches Serumglobulin.” Zeitschr. f. physiol. Chem. Bd. xxviii. p. 559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, (1905). “Experimentelle Beiträge zur Trypanosomeninfection.” Zeitschr. f. exp. Path. u. Ther. Bd. i. p. 539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moll, (1906). “Zur Globulinvermehrung der Präcipitinsera.” Zeitschr. f. exp. Path. u. Ther. Bd. ii. H. ii.Google Scholar
Pick, (1902). “Zur Kenntniss der Immunkörper.” Hofmeister's Beiträge, Bd. i.Google Scholar
Porges, and Spiro, (1903). “Die Globuline des Blutserums.” Hofmeister's Beiträge, Bd. iii. p. 277.Google Scholar
Reye, (1898). “Ueber den Nachweis u. Bestimmung des Fibrinogens.” Dissertation, Strassburg.Google Scholar
Seng, (1899). “Ueber die qualitativen u. quantitativen Verhältnisse der. Eiweisskörper im Diphtherieheilserum.” Zeitschr. f. Hyg. Bd. xxxi. p. 513.Google Scholar
Szontagh, and Wellmann, (1898). Deutsche med. Wochenschr. No. 27.Google Scholar