Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-xq9c7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-22T00:49:23.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Danysz Effect with reference to the Toxin-antitoxin Reaction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

J. A. Craw
J. A. Craw
Affiliation:
Grocers' Company Research Scholar, Hon. Demonstrator in PhysiologyLondon Hospital Medical College.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Svante Arrhenius (1908) has taken exception to my criticism (1907) of his interpretation of the Danysz Effect with reference to the Toxin-Antitoxin reaction. In this paper he has given an interesting but rather far-fetched analogy to the Danysz Effect, which is, according to him, purely chemical in character and subject to the laws of chemical mass action, and here marks in italics that “the opponents of the use of these laws have still given no explanation at all of the Danysz Effect, especially of the experiments cited in our memoir”.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , April 1909 , pp. 46 - 59
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1909

References

REFERENCES

Arrhenius, (1907). Immunochemistry, The Macmillan Co., New York.Google Scholar
Arrhenius, (1908). Journ. of Hygiene, Vol. viii. p. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayliss, (1906). Bio-Chemical Journal, Vol. i. p. 175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biltz, (1904). Göttinger Nachrichten, Math.-phys. Kl. No. 1.Google Scholar
Biltz, Zeitschr. f. physical. Chemie, Vol. xlviii. p. 615.Google Scholar
Bordet, (1903). Ann. de l'inst. Pasteur, Vol. xvii. p. 161.Google Scholar
Craw, (1904). Lancet, p. 434.Google Scholar
Craw, (1905, I). Journ. of Hygiene, Vol. v. p. 115.Google Scholar
Craw, (1905, III). Proc. Roy. Soc. B. Vol. lxxvi. p. 188.Google Scholar
Craw, Zeitschr. f. physical. Chemie, Vol. lii. p. 569.Google Scholar
Craw, (1907). Journ. of Hygiene, Vol. vii. p. 501.Google Scholar
Danysz, (1902). Ann. de l'inst. Pasteur, Vol. xvi. p. 331.Google Scholar
V, Dungern (1904). Deutsche med. Wochenschr. Vol. xxx. pp. 275, 310.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, (1898). Deutsche med. Wochenschr. Vol. xxiv. p. 597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrlich, (1903). Berlin. klin. Wochenschr. Vol. xl. pp. 793, 825, 848.Google Scholar
Hoitsema, (1895). Zeitschr. f. physical. Chemie, Vol. xvii. p. 1.Google Scholar
Laudsteiner, (1903). München. med. Wochenschr. Vol. l. p. 764.Google Scholar
Madsen, and Arrhenius, (1906). Meddelh. fråm Vet.-Akads. Nobelinstitut, Vol. i. No. 3.Google Scholar
Madsen, and Arrhenius, Communic. de l'institut sérothérapique de létat Danois, Extraits, Vol. i.Google Scholar
Madsen, and Arrhenius, (1907). Centralbl. f. Bakteriol. Ref. Vol. xxxix. p. 189.Google Scholar
Nernst, (1904). Zeitschr. f. Electrochemie, Vol. x. p. 377.Google Scholar
Ramsey, , Mond, and Shields, (1895). Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Vol. clxxxvi. p. 657.Google Scholar
Ramsey, , Mond, and Shields, (1897). Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Vol. clxl. A p. 129.Google Scholar
Ramsey, , Mond, and Shields, (1898). Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Vol. clxli. A p. 105.Google Scholar
Sachs, (1904). Berlin. klin. Wochenschr. No. 16.Google Scholar
Sachs, Centralbl. f. Bakteriol. Vol. xxxvii. No. 2.Google Scholar
Travers, (1906). Proc. Roy. Soc. A. Vol. lxxviii. p. 9.Google Scholar