Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T04:08:59.369Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mendelian Variation in the Paracolon Mutabile Colon Group and the application of Mendel's Principles to the Theory of Acquired Virulence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

F. H. Stewart
F. H. Stewart
Affiliation:
(Assistant Medical Officer, County Mental Hospital, Cheddleton.)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

It is the thesis of this paper that Mendel's principle of varitaion, formed from the study of the genetics of higher plants and animals, can be applied also to bacteria, and that acquired virulence in bacteria is the result of Mendelian variation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , August 1926 , pp. 237 - 255
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1926

References

LITERATURE

Almquist, (1923). Zeitschr. f. Hyg. C. 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almquist, (1924). J. Infect. Disease, XXXV. 341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arkwright, (1921). J. Path. and Bact. XXIV. 36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arkwright, and Goyle, (1924). Brit. J. Exper. Path. V. 104.Google Scholar
Avery, and Heidelberger, (1925). J. Exper. Med. XLII. 367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baerthlein, (1911). Centralbl. Bakt. Abt. I. Ref. L. Beiheft, p. 128.Google Scholar
Baerthlein, (1912). Centralbl. Bakt. Orig. LXVI. 21.Google Scholar
Baerthlein, (1918). Centralbl. Bakt. LXXXI. 369.Google Scholar
Bateson, (1913). Mendel's Principles.Google Scholar
Bernhardt, G. (1915). Zeitschr. f. Hyg. LXXIX. 179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burck, A. (1908). Arch. f. Hyg. LX. 235. (Summary in Bull. Inst. Pasteur, 1908, P. 639.)Google Scholar
Burri, (1910). Centralbl. Bakt. Abt. II. Orig. XXVIII. 321.Google Scholar
Burri, and Düggeli, (1909). Centralbl. Bakt. Abt. I. Orig. XLIX. 143.Google Scholar
Darwin, (1868). Animals and plants under Domestication.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobell, (1912, 1913). J. Genetics, II. 285, 325.Google Scholar
Gilbert, and Lion, (1893). Semaine Méd.Google Scholar
György, (1921). Centralbl. Bakt. Abt. I. Orig. LXXXIV. 321.Google Scholar
Herrold, and culver, (1919). J. Infect. Disease, XXX. 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lancefield, (1925). J. Exper. Med. XLII. 337, 397.Google Scholar
MacGowan, and Chung, Yik wang (1915–1916). J. Path, and Bact. XX. 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, (1913). J. Path, and Bact. XVIII. 137.Google Scholar
Massini, (1907). Arch. f. Hyg. LXI. 250. (Summary in Bull. Inst. Pasteur, 1907, P. 791.)Google Scholar
Morgan, (1906). Brit. Med. Journ. I. 908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, (1907). Brit. Med. Journ. II. 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, and Ledingham, (1909). Proc. R. Soc. Med. Epidemiol. Sect. p. 133.Google Scholar
Müller, Reiner (1909). Centralbl. Bakt. Abt. I. Ref. XLII. Beiheft, p. 57.Google Scholar
Müller, Reiner (1911). Centralbl. Bakt. Abt. I. Ref. Orig. LVIII. 97.Google Scholar
Neisser, J. M. (1906). Centralbl. Bakt. Abt. I. Ref. Abt. I. Ref. XXXVIII. Beiheft, p. 98.Google Scholar
Penfold, (1911). J. Hygiene, XI. 30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penfold, (1911). Proc. R. Soc. Med. Iv. Pathol. Sect. P. 97.Google Scholar
Punnett, (1919). Mendelism.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinmann, (1925). J. Exper. Med. LXI. 589.Google Scholar
Savage, and Bruce, (1925). Med. Res. Council, XCI.Google Scholar
Schütze, (1922). J. Hygiene, XX. 330.Google Scholar
Smith, Henderson (1913). Centralbl. Bakt. Abt. I. Orig. LXVIII. 151.Google Scholar
Toeniessen, E. (1920). Centralbl. Bakt. LXXXV. 225.Google Scholar
Toeniessen, E. (1921). Centralbl. Bakt. LXXXVI. 353.Google Scholar