Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T04:02:04.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Incidence and penicillin sensitivity of Staphylococcus aureus in the nose in infants and their mothers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

G. B. Ludlam
G. B. Ludlam
Affiliation:
Public Health Laboratory Service, Nottingham
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Among infants attending Child Welfare Clinics there was a steady decline in the incidence of nasal carriage of Staph. aureus over the first year of life.

2. Infants born in hospital showed a much higher incidence of Staph. aureus in the first 2 months of life than infants born at home. A similar difference was also very distinct in the later part of the first year of life.

3. Mothers delivered 2 weeks to 2 months previously had a higher incidence of nasal carriage of Staph. aureus when delivered in hospital than when delivered at home. After this interval the incidence was similar in all groups of mothers throughout the rest of the year.

4. In the first few months of life there was a tendency for carriage in infants to be associated with carriage in the mother, but towards the end of the year there was no such relationship. This association appeared most clearly in infants born at home and in infants 2–5 months old born in hospital F.

5. A very high proportion (25 out of 30) of the strains tested from infants born in hospital F less than 5 months previously were penicillin-resistant. Infants born at home had a much lower incidence of resistant strains.

6. A high proportion of strains of Staph. aureus isolated from mothers delivered in hospital F were resistant throughout the first year. Strains from mothers delivered in hospital C or at home showed a much lower proportion of resistant strains.

7. Phage-typing showed a great variety of types, but those found among the penicillin-resistant strains were rather less varied than among the sensitive strains. When Staph. aureus was found both in infant and mother, although the same phage type was commonly present in both, in 16 out of 35 couples different types were found.

8. Investigation in maternity hospitals C and F showed a high proportion of penicillin-resistant strains of Staph. aureus among the nurses and infants and in the dust of the nurseries, but not among the mothers. There was no important difference between the two hospitals as regards the incidence of resistant strains isolated from nurses and infants in spite of the differences found in babies from the two hospitals when swabbed at the clinics.

9. The significance of these results is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 51 , Issue 1 , March 1953 , pp. 64 - 74
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1953

References

Allison, V. D. & Hobbs, Betty C. (1947). An inquiry into the epidemiology of pemphigus neonatorum. Brit. med. J. 2, 1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barber, Mary & Whitehead, J. E. M. (1949). Bacteriophage types in penicillin-resistant staphylococcal infections. Brit. med. J. 2, 565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergqvist, S. (1950). Observations concerning the presence of pyogenic staphylococci in the nose and their relationship to the anti-staphylolysin titre. Acta med. scand. 136, 343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryce, L. M. & Burnet, F. M. (1932). Natural immunity to staphylococcal toxin. J. Path. Bact. 35, 183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cadness-Graves, B., Williams, R. E. O., Harper, G. J. & Miles, A. A. (1943). Slide-test for coagulase-positive staphylococci. Lancet, 1, 736.Google Scholar
Cowan, S. T. (1939 a). Classification of staphylococci by slide agglutination. J. Path. Bact. 48, 169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowan, S. T. (1939 b). Staphylococcal infections in rabbits: antibacterial and non-specific immunity. J. Path. Bact. 48, 553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunliffe, A. C. (1949). Incidence of Staph. aureus in the anterior nares of healthy children. Lancet, 2, 411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Downie, A. W. (1937). A comparison of the value of heat-killed vaccines and toxoid as immunising agents against experimental staphylococcal infections in the rabbit. J. Path. Bact. 44, 573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairbrother, R. W. & Martyn, G. (1951). The disc technique for determining sensitivity to the antibiotics. J. clin. Path. 4, 374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, Betty C. (1948). A study of the serological type differentiation of Staphylococcus pyogenes. J. Hyg., Camb., 46, 222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kitching, J. S. & Farrell, L. N. (1936). Staphylococcal immunity. Amer. J. Hyg. 24, 268.Google Scholar
Lichty, J. A., Katsampes, C. P. & Baum, W. S. (1943). Study of humoral antibodies for Staph. aureus in infants and their mothers. J. Pediat. 22, 549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludlam, G. B. (1949). A selective medium for the isolation of Staph. aureus from heavily contaminated material. Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth Publ. Hlth Lab. Serv. 8, 15.Google ScholarPubMed
Lyons, C. (1937). Antibacterial immunity to Staphylococcus pyogenes. Brit. J. exp. Path. 18, 411.Google Scholar
Packalén, T. & Bergqvist, S. (1947). Staphylococci in throat and nose and anti-staphylolysin titre. Acta med. scand. 127, 291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, M. T. & Kennedy, J. (1949). The source of infection in pemphigus neonatorum. J. Hyg., Camb., 47, 213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rountree, Phyllis M. & Barbour, R. G. H. (1950). Staphylococcus pyogenes in new-born babies in a maternity hospital. Med. J. Aust. 1, 525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, R. E. O. & Rippon, Joan E. (1952). Bacteriophage typing of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Hyg., Camb., 50, 320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed