Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T16:02:18.800Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Feral cats do not play a major role in leptospirosis epidemiology on Reunion Island

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2019

Y. Gomard*
Affiliation:
Université de La Réunion, UMR PIMIT (Processus Infectieux en Milieu Insulaire Tropical), INSERM 1187, CNRS 9192, IRD 249, Plateforme Technologique CYROI, Sainte-Clotilde, La Réunion, France
E. Lagadec
Affiliation:
Université de La Réunion, UMR PIMIT (Processus Infectieux en Milieu Insulaire Tropical), INSERM 1187, CNRS 9192, IRD 249, Plateforme Technologique CYROI, Sainte-Clotilde, La Réunion, France
L. Humeau
Affiliation:
Université de La Réunion, UMR PVBMT (Peuplements Végétaux et Bioagresseurs en Milieu Tropical), CIRAD, CS 92003, 97744 Saint Denis Cedex 9, La Réunion, France
P. Pinet
Affiliation:
Parc National de La Réunion, LIFE+ Pétrels, 258 Rue de la République, 97431, Plaine des Palmistes, La Réunion, France
S. Bureau
Affiliation:
Université de La Réunion, UMR ENTROPIE (Ecologie Marine Tropicale des Océans Pacifique et Indien), IRD, CNRS, CS 92003, 97744 Saint Denis Cedex 9, La Réunion, France
D. Da Silva
Affiliation:
Université de La Réunion, UMR PVBMT (Peuplements Végétaux et Bioagresseurs en Milieu Tropical), CIRAD, CS 92003, 97744 Saint Denis Cedex 9, La Réunion, France
M. Turpin
Affiliation:
Université de La Réunion, UMR PIMIT (Processus Infectieux en Milieu Insulaire Tropical), INSERM 1187, CNRS 9192, IRD 249, Plateforme Technologique CYROI, Sainte-Clotilde, La Réunion, France
Y. Soulaimana Mattoir
Affiliation:
Société d’Études Ornithologiques de La Réunion, 3 ruelle des Orchidées, Cambuston, 97440 Saint-André, La Réunion, France
S. Georger
Affiliation:
Association de Valorisation de l'Entre-Deux monde (AVE2M), 13 rue Josémont-Lauret /PK27, Bourg-Murat, 97418 Plaine des Cafres, La Réunion, France
P. Mavingui
Affiliation:
Université de La Réunion, UMR PIMIT (Processus Infectieux en Milieu Insulaire Tropical), INSERM 1187, CNRS 9192, IRD 249, Plateforme Technologique CYROI, Sainte-Clotilde, La Réunion, France Ecologie Microbienne UMR CNRS 5557, Université Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France
P. Tortosa
Affiliation:
Université de La Réunion, UMR PIMIT (Processus Infectieux en Milieu Insulaire Tropical), INSERM 1187, CNRS 9192, IRD 249, Plateforme Technologique CYROI, Sainte-Clotilde, La Réunion, France
*
Author for correspondence: Y. Gomard, E-mail: yann.gomard@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although previous studies have reported Leptospira carriage in kidneys and urine of cats, the role of these animals in leptospirosis epidemiology remains poorly understood. Using molecular methods, we investigated Leptospira renal carriage in 172 feral cats from Reunion Island, an oceanic geographically isolated island located in the South West Indian Ocean. Only one out of the 172 analysed specimens tested positive for Leptospira DNA through quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Using this positive sample, we could obtain sequences at three Leptospira loci (rrs2, lipL32 and lipL41) allowing to report for the first time Leptospira borgpetersenii naturally infecting cats. Comparisons with bacterial sequences from both acute human cases and animal reservoirs revealed similarities with Leptospira sequences previously reported on Reunion Island. However, the low prevalence (0.6%) reported herein does not support any major role of feral cats in leptospirosis epidemiology on Reunion Island, contrasting with results recently reported on another Indian Ocean Island, Christmas Island. The significance of these discrepancies is discussed.

Type
Short Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2019

Leptospirosis is a widespread re-emerging infectious disease caused by pathogenic bacteria belonging to the genus Leptospira (Spirochaetales, Leptospiraceae) [Reference Levett1]. Pathogenic Leptospira are maintained in the renal tubules of animal reservoirs, which contaminate the environment through their urine. Human infection occurs either through contact with the animal's urine or contaminated environment [Reference Levett1]. It is estimated that leptospirosis causes over 1 million human cases per year, leading to nearly 60 000 fatal cases [Reference Costa2]. The disease incidence is higher in subtropical regions [Reference Pappas3] probably due to environmental conditions (increased humidity and temperature) favourable to Leptospira maintenance and transmission.

Leptospirosis represents a major burden in the South West Indian Ocean (SWIO) region, with some islands such as Seychelles displaying amongst the highest incidence worldwide [Reference Pappas3, Reference Biscornet4]. In this context, considerable efforts have been made to characterise leptospirosis epidemiology in the region. Recently, molecular studies comparing Leptospira sequence types obtained from acute human cases and animal reservoirs have identified a number of probable important reservoirs [Reference Biscornet4Reference Lagadec7]. These studies have shown that beside rats, other animals play a significant role in Leptospira epidemiology including tenrecs, a family of small insectivorous mammals endemic to Madagascar, as well as introduced mammals such as cows, mice and dogs [Reference Biscornet4, Reference Guernier6, Reference Lagadec7]. However, for some Leptospira lineages infecting humans, the animal reservoir(s) still remain(s) to be identified.

The reported presence of pathogenic leptospiral DNA in the urine of cats [Reference Guernier6, Reference Chan8, Reference Weis9] strengthens the need for an investigation of this potential reservoir. Leptospira carriage has been previously reported in stray cats on Reunion Island [Reference Desvars10] although no sequences were produced and hence precluded any molecular comparison with bacterial strains characterised from human acute cases and animals. Recently, feral cats have been reported as important carriers of pathogenic Leptospira on Christmas Island [Reference Dybing11], a true oceanic Island located in the Eastern Indian Ocean. These data stimulate the need for investigating feral cats as reservoirs of pathogenic Leptospira on Reunion Island.

This study was carried out in the frame of the LIFE+ Pétrels project (http://www.petrels.re), a conservation project aiming at protecting two endemic and endangered seabird species of Reunion Island (55°39′E, 21°00′S), namely Barau's Petrel (Pterodroma baraui) and Mascarene Petrel (Pseudobulweria aterrima). Feral cats are known to predate the Barau's Petrel (eggs, chicks, juveniles and adults) [Reference Faulquier12] and removal of feral cats in nesting areas is a major conservation action implemented locally by the LIFE+ Pétrels partners in collaboration with a local non-governmental organisation called AVE2M. The protocols of research were approved by the CYROI institutional ethical committee, certified by the French Ministry of Higher Education and Research (NoAPAFIS#6916-20151 00213267087 v6). Cats were trapped between July 2015 and December 2016 using live traps at six different sites from 110 to 2850 m elevation, in disturbed and preserved areas. The periods of sampling covered the two local seasons: cool–dry season from July to October and hot–wet summer from November to June. The animals were then euthanised by the veterinary clinic of Saint Louis. Different tissues samples were taken (heart, stomachs, kidneys and blood) and stored at −80 °C until laboratory analyses.

For each animal, total nucleic acids were extracted from a small piece of kidney using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit (Qiagen) following the manufacturer's recommendations. Leptospira detection was performed on each DNA extract by using a specific protocol of quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) targeting the 16S gene (rrs2) of pathogenic Leptospira [Reference Smythe13]. On each qPCR-positive sample, Leptospira was genotyped using a multilocus sequence typing (MLST) (pubmlst.org, scheme# 3) encompassing six genes (secY, adk, rrs2, icdA, lipL32 and lipL41) [Reference Ahmed14] and optimised in order to characterise the Leptospira diversity actually circulating in the SWIO region [Reference Dietrich15]. Each PCR product was visualised under UV light after migration on a 2% agarose gel containing 1X GelRed™ (Biotum Inc., Hayward, CA, USA). The PCR products were sequenced on both strands (Genoscreen, Lille, France) by using the corresponding set of primers and all sequences were deposited in GenBank (MH820176–MH820178).

A total of 172 feral cats were tested for pathogenic Leptospira renal carriage of which only one tested positive (cycle threshold for qPCR: 37.6) yielding a prevalence of 0.6%. The single positive animal corresponded to an adult female sampled in a disturbed mountain rainforest. Full MLST was attempted on this sample but a sequence could be obtained for only three out of the six MLST loci, rrs2, lipL32 and lipL41, showing that the infecting Leptospira corresponded to Leptospira borgpetersenii. The comparison of the sequences with the PubMLST database (pubmlst.org, scheme# 3) indicates that rrs2 and lipL32 sequences are new and closely related to the rrs2 allele 20 (one nucleotide difference) and lipL32 allele 30 (one nucleotide difference), respectively, while the lipL41 sequence corresponds to lipL41 allele 38. Although full genotyping could not be achieved, the combination of these three alleles indicates that the detected L. borgpetersenii could correspond to the Sequence Type 127. We then compared each allele to sequences previously obtained from acute human cases and wild mammals on Reunion Island. Interestingly, rrs2 sequence (503 bp) showed 100% identity with a sequence previously obtained from a human case on Reunion Island (Homo sapiens #213013106601; GenBank number: KU183592). The lipL32 sequence (434 bp) showed 100% identity with the lipL32 sequence obtained from this same human case (H. sapiens #213013106601; GenBank number KU183575) and also from a house mouse (Mus musculus BLA030; GenBank number: KU183573). The lipL41 sequence (411 bp) showed 100% identity with a sequence reported from another human case (H. sapiens #31658, GenBank number: KU183581).

This study confirms the presence of pathogenic Leptospira infection in cats from Reunion Island [Reference Guernier6, Reference Desvars10]. However, the detected prevalence is extremely low (0.6%, 1/172) as compared with that previously reported on stray cats from Reunion Island (28.6%, 6/21) [Reference Desvars10] or from the neighbouring Seychelles (8.3%, 1/12) [Reference Biscornet4]. Feral and stray cats occupy distinct ecological niches and it is possible that the difference in infection prevalence results from distinct levels of exposure to pathogenic Leptospira (i.e. differences of prey and/or environments). The study of Dybing et al. [Reference Dybing11] reported high infection prevalence in feral cats on the tropical Christmas Island, but the absence of renal carriage in feral cats from other territories with arid or temperate environments (Dirk Hartog Island and southwest Western Australia, respectively). The authors proposed that the tropical climate on Christmas Island is favourable to survival and hence transmission of the bacteria [Reference Dybing11]. In the present study, although evolving in tropical conditions, Reunion feral cats display low renal carriage throughout the year. These differences among islands are in keeping with other studies showing distinct transmission chains (i.e. reservoirs and Leptospira species) in different islands within the same region [Reference Biscornet4, Reference Guernier6, Reference Lagadec7] and stimulate a thorough investigation of the epidemiology in each environmental setup.

The implication of cats in leptospirosis epidemiology remains poorly investigated and most of the available studies are based on serological approaches (Microscopic Agglutination Test) (see in [Reference Azócar-Aedo, Smits and Monti16]), which bring in information on the actual exposure of animals to Leptospira but certainly not on their role as a biological reservoir. Indeed, studies reported the absence of congruence between serology and PCR results in different mammal species which indicated that the serology is not a relevant tool to predict the reservoir status of given species [Reference Chan8, Reference Libonati, Pinto and Lilenbaum17, Reference Sant'anna, Grapiglia and Lilenbaum18]. To our knowledge, only scarce molecular identification of Leptospira infecting cats is available, with two Leptospira species being previously reported, namely Leptospira interrogans and Leptospira kirschneri [Reference Chan8, Reference Dybing11]. We report for the first time L. borgpetersenii naturally infecting cats. On Reunion Island, L. borgpetersenii has been reported in cows and mice and rarely in human acute cases [Reference Guernier6]. The detection of an identical lipL32 sequence in the single positive cat and in a house mouse, which is typically a cat prey, supports a previously proposed hypothesis of infection through predation [Reference Hartmann19]. However, our data do not allow fully addressing such hypothesis, which would require gathering additional molecular data, including access to full genomes.

Altogether, the presence of pathogenic leptospiral DNA in the urine of cats confirms previous studies suggesting that these animals are a potential source of contamination for humans. However, more investigations are necessary to determine the epidemiological importance of this reservoir in the disease, including the isolation of Leptospira from cats’ urines. In the context of Reunion Island, although we detected identical Leptospira sequences in the single positive cat and in acute human cases on three loci, the low prevalence allows us rejecting any major role of feral cats in the local epidemiology of leptospirosis. These results are strikingly different from those reported on Christmas Island, where the prevalence is indeed high in cats [Reference Dybing11]. Hence, this work supports previous published studies showing distinct transmission chains in the different islands of the SWIO region [Reference Biscornet4, Reference Guernier6, Reference Lagadec7]. Altogether, these data pinpoint the importance of a proper molecular assessment of Leptospira prevailing at each specific environment in order to establish the role of major involved biological compartments and optimise the design of preventive measures.

Author ORCIDs

Y. Gomard, 0000-0002-7700-9201.

Acknowledgements

This study was carried out by the UMR PIMIT within the framework of the project LIFE+ Pétrels (Grant Agreement: LIFE13 BIO/FR/000075) in collaboration with the local non-governmental organisation Association pour la Valorisation de l'Entre Deux Monde (AVE2M). The European project LIFE+ Pétrels is driven by Le Parc National de La Réunion, L'Université de La Réunion, La Société d’Études Ornithologiques de La Réunion (SEOR) and l'Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage, with the financial support of the European Union, La Direction de l'Environnement, L'Aménagement et du Logement and Le Conseil Départemental de La Réunion. The authors are thankful to the persons and institutions who helped in specimens trapping and sample collection: Ségolène Praud (Université de La Réunion), Simon Deblock and Lionel Chenal (Veterinary clinic of Saint Louis) and all the field workers involved in the cat control from the different involved institutions (SEOR, AVE2M, Parc National de La Réunion).

Financial support

This work was financed by European Regional Development Funds ERDF PO INTERREG V ECOSPIR #RE6875 and the European project LIFE+ PETRELS (LIFE13 BIO/FR/000075).

Conflict of interest

None.

References

1.Levett, PN (2001) Leptospirosis. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 14, 296326.Google Scholar
2.Costa, F et al. (2015) Global morbidity and mortality of leptospirosis: a systematic review. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 9, e0003898.Google Scholar
3.Pappas, G et al. (2008) The globalization of leptospirosis: worldwide incidence trends. International Journal of Infectious Diseases 12, 351357.Google Scholar
4.Biscornet, L et al. (2017) Human leptospirosis in Seychelles: a prospective study confirms the heavy burden of the disease but suggests that rats are not the main reservoir. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 11, e0005831.Google Scholar
5.Desvars, A et al. (2012) Similarities in Leptospira serogroup and species distribution in animals and humans in the Indian Ocean Island of Mayotte. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 87, 134140.Google Scholar
6.Guernier, V et al. (2016) Human Leptospirosis on Reunion Island, Indian Ocean: are rodents the (only) ones to blame? PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 10, e0004733.Google Scholar
7.Lagadec, E et al. (2016) Identification of Tenrec ecaudatus, a wild mammal introduced to Mayotte Island, as a reservoir of the newly identified human pathogenic Leptospira mayottensis. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 10, e0004933.Google Scholar
8.Chan, K-W et al. (2013) Serological and PCR detection of feline Leptospira in Southern Taiwan. Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases 14, 118123.Google Scholar
9.Weis, S et al. (2017) Detection of Leptospira DNA in urine and presence of specific antibodies in outdoor cats in Germany. Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery 19, 470476.Google Scholar
10.Desvars, A et al. (2013) Endemicity of leptospirosis in domestic and wild animal species from Reunion Island (Indian Ocean). Epidemiology and Infection 141, 11541165.Google Scholar
11.Dybing, NA et al. (2017) Leptospira species in feral cats and black rats from Western Australia and Christmas Island. Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases 17, 319324.Google Scholar
12.Faulquier, L et al. (2009) Feral cats Felis catus threaten the endangered endemic Barau's petrel Pterodroma baraui at Reunion Island (Western Indian Ocean). Waterbirds 32, 330336.Google Scholar
13.Smythe, LD et al. (2002) A quantitative PCR (TaqMan) assay for pathogenic Leptospira spp. BMC Infectious Diseases 2, 13.Google Scholar
14.Ahmed, N et al. (2006) Multilocus sequence typing method for identification and genotypic classification of pathogenic Leptospira species. Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials 5, 28.Google Scholar
15.Dietrich, M et al. (2014) Diversification of an emerging pathogen in a biodiversity hotspot: Leptospira in endemic small mammals of Madagascar. Molecular Ecology 23, 27832796.Google Scholar
16.Azócar-Aedo, L, Smits, HL and Monti, G (2014) Leptospirosis in dogs and cats: epidemiology, clinical disease, zoonotic implications and prevention. Archivos de Medicina Veterinaria 46, 337348.Google Scholar
17.Libonati, H, Pinto, PS and Lilenbaum, W (2017) Seronegativity of bovines face to their own recovered leptospiral isolates. Microbial Pathogenesis 108, 101103.Google Scholar
18.Sant'anna, R, Grapiglia, J and Lilenbaum, W (2017) High number of asymptomatic dogs as leptospiral carriers in an endemic area indicates a serious public health concern. Epidemiology and Infection 145, 18521854.Google Scholar
19.Hartmann, K et al. (2013) Leptospira species infection in cats: ABCD guidelines on prevention and management. Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery 15, 576581.Google Scholar