Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Evaluation of the pooling of swabs for real-time PCR detection of low titre shedding of low pathogenicity avian influenza in turkeys

  • M. E. ARNOLD (a1), M. J. SLOMKA (a1), V. J. COWARD (a1), S. MAHMOOD (a1), P. J. RALEIGH (a2) and I. H. BROWN (a1)...

Summary

The purpose of this study was to determine whether pooling avian influenza (AI)-positive swabs with negative swabs has a detrimental effect on the sensitivity of AI real-time reverse transcription–polymerase chain reactions (rRT–PCRs). Cloacal and buccal swabs were sampled daily from 12 turkeys infected with A/goose/England/07(H2N2). For half the turkeys, each swab was mixed with four swabs from known AI-negative turkeys, and for the other half the swabs were tested individually. Bayesian modelling was used to (i) determine whether pooling the positive swabs compromised the cycle threshold (Ct) value obtained from the rRT–PCRs, and (ii) estimate the likelihood of detection of an H2N2 infected turkey flock via rRT–PCR for pooled and individually tested swabs (cloacal and buccal) vs. the number of days post-infection of the flock. Results indicated that there was no significant effect of compromising AI rRT–PCR sensitivity by pooling a weak positive swab with negative swabs on the Ct values which were obtained. Pooled sampling was able to widen the detection window compared to individual sampling, for the same number of rRT–PCR tests. This indicates that pooled sampling would be an effective method of reducing the number of tests to be performed to determine flock status during an AI outbreak and for surveillance.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Evaluation of the pooling of swabs for real-time PCR detection of low titre shedding of low pathogenicity avian influenza in turkeys
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Evaluation of the pooling of swabs for real-time PCR detection of low titre shedding of low pathogenicity avian influenza in turkeys
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Evaluation of the pooling of swabs for real-time PCR detection of low titre shedding of low pathogenicity avian influenza in turkeys
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Author for correspondence: Dr M. E Arnold, AHVLA Sutton Bonington, The Elms, College Road, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, LE12 5RB, UK. (Email: mark.arnold@ahvla.gsi.gov.uk)

References

Hide All
1.Alexander, DJ. An overview of the epidemiology of avian influenza. Vaccine 2007; 25: 56375644.
2.Alexander, DJ, Brown, IH. History of highly pathogenic avian influenza. OIE Scientific Technical Review 2009; 28: 1938.
3.OIE (World Organisation for Animal Health). Avian influenza, chapter 10.4. In: Terrestrial Animal Health Code. Paris: OIE, 2008.
4.Alexander, DJ. Summary of avian influenza activity in Europe, Asia, Africa and Australasia 2002–2006. Avian Diseases 2007; 51: 161166.
5.Brown, IH. Summary of avian influenza activity in Europe, Asia, and Africa, 2006–2009. Avian Diseases 2010; 54: 187193.
6.EU (European Union). Diagnostic manual for avian influenza. Official Journal of European Union L237/1 (31 August). 2006 (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/oj/2006/l_237/l_23720060831en00010027.pdf).
7.OIE (World Organisation for Animal Health). Avian influenza, chapter 2.3.4. In: Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals. Paris: OIE, 2009.
8.Hoffmann, B, et al. A review of RT-PCR technologies used in veterinary virology and disease control: sensitive and specific diagnosis of five livestock diseases notifiable to the World Organisation for Animal Health. Veterinary Microbiology 2009; 139: 123.
9.Slomka, MJ, et al. Role of real-time RT-PCR platform technology in the diagnosis and management of notifiable avian influenza outbreaks: experiences in Great Britain. Avian Diseases 2010; 54: 591596.
10.McPherson, MJ, Møller, SG. Real-time RT-PCR, In: PCR, 2nd edn.New York: Taylor and Francis, 2006, pp. 209231.
11.Spackman, E, et al. Development of a real-time reverse transcriptase PCR assay for type A influenza virus and the avian H5 and H7 haemagglutinin subtypes. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2002; 40: 32563260.
12.Lee, C-W, Suarez, DL. Application of real-time RT-PCR for the quantitation and competitive replication study of H5 and H7 subtype avian influenza virus. Journal of Virological Methods 2004; 119: 151158.
13.Slomka, MJ, et al. Validated H5 Eurasian real-time reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction and its application in H5N1 outbreaks in 2005–2006. Avian Diseases 2007; 51: 373377.
14.Slomka, MJ, et al. Validated real time reverse transcriptase PCR methods for the diagnosis and pathotyping of Eurasian H7 avian influenza viruses. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses 2009; 3: 151164.
15.Monne, I, et al. Development and validation of a one step real time PCR assay for simultaneous detection of subtype H5, H7, and H9 avian influenza viruses. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2008; 46: 17691773.
16.Arnold, ME, Cook, AJC, Davies, RH. A modelling approach to estimate the sensitivity of pooled faecal samples for isolation of Salmonella in pigs. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 2005; 2: 365372.
17.Arnold, ME, et al. Estimation of pooled-sample sensitivity for detection of Salmonella in turkey flocks. Journal of Applied Microbiology 2009; 107: 936943.
18.Arnold, ME, Carrique-Mas, JJ, Davies, RH. Estimation of the sensitivity of environmental sampling for detection of Salmonella Enteriditis in commercial egg-laying flocks relative to the within-flock prevalence. Epidemiology and Infection 2010; 138: 330339.
19.Arnold, ME, et al. Investigation into the effectiveness of pooled fecal samples for detection of verocytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli O157 in cattle. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation 2008; 20: 2127.
20.Reed, LJ, Muench, H. A simple method of estimating fifty percent endpoints. American Journal of Hygiene 1938; 27: 493497.
21.Petrauskene, OV, et al. New highly sensitive and accurate lyophilized real-time RT-PCR tests for early detection of avian influenza. Avian Diseases 2010; 54: 686689.
22.Perkins, LEL, Swayne, DE. Pathobiology of A/chicken/Hong Kong/220/97 (H5N1) avian influenza virus in seven gallinaceous species. Veterinary Pathology 2001; 38: 149164.
23.Slomka, MJ, et al. Challenges for accurate and prompt molecular diagnosis of clades of highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 viruses emerging in Vietnam. Avian Pathology 2012; 41: 177193.
24.Spiegelhalter, DJ, et al. Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (B) 2002; 64: 583640.
25.Comin, A, et al. Transmission dynamics of low pathogenic avian influenza in turkey flocks. PLoS ONE 2011; 6: 10.
26.Das, A, et al. Development of an internal positive control for rapid diagnosis of avian influenza virus infections by real-time reverse transcription-PCR with lyophilized reagents. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2006; 44: 30653073.
27.Kim, J-K, et al. Ducks: the ‘Trojan horses’ of H5N1 influenza. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses 2009; 3: 121128.
28.Kim, J-K, et al. Pathogenicity and vaccine efficacy of different clades of Asian H5N1 avian influenza A viruses in domestic ducks. Journal of Virology 2008; 82: 1137411382.
29.Sturm-Ramirez, KM, et al. Are ducks contributing to the endemicity of highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza virus in Asia? Journal of Virology 2005; 79: 1126911279.

Keywords

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Arnold Supplementary Material
Figures and Table.doc

 Word (305 KB)
305 KB

Evaluation of the pooling of swabs for real-time PCR detection of low titre shedding of low pathogenicity avian influenza in turkeys

  • M. E. ARNOLD (a1), M. J. SLOMKA (a1), V. J. COWARD (a1), S. MAHMOOD (a1), P. J. RALEIGH (a2) and I. H. BROWN (a1)...

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed