Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T15:41:22.627Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The diagnostic value of the widal test in the inoculated

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

R. H. Mole
Affiliation:
Clinical Pathologist, Royal Infirmary, Liverpool, Lately R.A.F. General Hospital, Karachi, India
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Evidence is given that in recently inoculated persons the Widal reaction, even when serial quantitative tests are done, has no practical value in the diagnosis of enteric fever. Conscription enlarges permanently the inoculated proportion of the whole population.

2. The diagnostic value of any particular titre depends not only on the relative frequencies with which this titre occurs in normal and infected individuals but also on the incidence of enteric fever in the population and on the fashionableness of the Widal test as a diagnostic aid.

3. It is emphasized that blood culture is a more reliable aid to diagnosis than the Widal test.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1948

References

REFERENCES

Dreyer, G. (1916). Lancet, 2, 419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, H. M. & Bensted, H. J. (1929). System of bacteriology, Med. Research Council, 4, 79.Google Scholar
Topley, W. W. C. & Wilson, G. S. (1946). Principles of Bacteriology and Immunity, 3rd ed. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, E. W. A. (1917). Lancet, 1, 568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J. F. (1945). J. Hyg., Camb., 44, 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar