Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-13T10:30:49.292Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cytopathogenicity and molecular subtyping of Legionella pneumophila environmental isolates from 17 hospitals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2008

M. GARCIA-NUÑEZ*
Affiliation:
Infectious Diseases Section, Fundació Institut d'Investigació Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Autonomous University of Barcelona CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Spain
M. L. PEDRO-BOTET
Affiliation:
Infectious Diseases Section, Fundació Institut d'Investigació Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Autonomous University of Barcelona CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Spain
S. RAGULL
Affiliation:
Infectious Diseases Section, Fundació Institut d'Investigació Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Autonomous University of Barcelona
N. SOPENA
Affiliation:
Infectious Diseases Section, Fundació Institut d'Investigació Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Autonomous University of Barcelona
J. MORERA
Affiliation:
Pneumology Department, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Autonomous University of Barcelona
C. REY-JOLY
Affiliation:
Infectious Diseases Section, Fundació Institut d'Investigació Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Autonomous University of Barcelona
M. SABRIA
Affiliation:
Infectious Diseases Section, Fundació Institut d'Investigació Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Autonomous University of Barcelona CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Spain
*
*Author for correspondence: M. Garcia-Nuñez, M.Sc., Infectious Diseases Unit, Fundació Institut Investigació en Ciencies de la Salut Germans Trias i Pujol, C/Can Ruti.Camí escoles s/n 08916 Badalona, Barcelona, Spain. (Email: mgarcia.igtp.germanstrias@gencat.net)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The cytopathogenicity of 22 Legionella pneumophila isolates from 17 hospitals was determined by assessing the dose of bacteria necessary to produce 50% cytopathic effect (CPED50) in U937 human-derived macrophages. All isolates were able to infect and grow in macrophage-like cells (range log10 CPED50: 2·67–6·73 c.f.u./ml). Five groups were established and related to the serogroup, the number of PFGE patterns coexisting in the same hospital water distribution system, and the possible reporting of hospital-acquired Legionnaires' disease cases. L. pneumophila serogroup 1 isolates had the highest cytopathogenicity (P=0·003). Moreover, a trend to more cytopathogenic groups (groups 1–3) in hospitals with more than one PFGE pattern of L. pneumophila in the water distribution system (60% vs. 17%) and in hospitals reporting cases of hospital-acquired Legionnaires' disease (36·3% vs. 16·6%) was observed. We conclude that the cytopathogenicty of environmental L. pneumophila should be taken into account in evaluating the risk of a contaminated water reservoir in a hospital and hospital acquisition of Legionnaires' disease.

Type
Original Papers
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Cambridge University Press

INTRODUCTION

Hospital-acquired Legionnaires' disease (LD) has been reported in many hospitals since the first outbreak in 1976 [Reference Sabria and Yu1]. Although cooling towers were linked to many of the cases of LD in the years after its discovery, potable water has been the environmental source for almost all reported hospital outbreaks [Reference Best2Reference Stout4]. Legionella spp. are common commensals of large building water-supply systems. In a previous study we demonstrated that L. pneumophila was present in 17 out of 20 hospital water systems [Reference Sabria5] and prospective surveillance showed that cases of hospital-acquired LD appeared in 11 of these hospitals [Reference Sabria6]. The remainder did not report any cases of LD, although appropriate techniques were available for the diagnosis of Legionella spp. and most (70%) reported >30% positive peripheral sampling points.

There are some clinical data indicating that the virulence of Legionella spp. may vary, although it unclear whether this is a consequence of differences in bacterial virulence or in host immunity. Examples are: the survival of patients with LD despite not receiving adequate antibiotic treatment [Reference Macfarlane7], the variability in the mortality observed in different community outbreaks [Reference Lettinga8, Reference Garcia-Fulgueiras9], or the fact that most cases are caused by L. pneumophila serogroup (sg) 1 [Reference Marston, Lipman and Breiman10]. In experimental studies, isolates from amoebas exhibit a variety of phenotypes that appear to increase the incidence and complications of LD in humans [Reference Barker11Reference Rowbotham13]. Furthermore, some authors have demonstrated that Legionella strains causing pulmonary disease express more virulence traits than those that do not cause human disease [Reference Alli14]. Virulence traits show differences between species [Reference Alli14, Reference Joshi and Swanson15] and strains of L. pneumophila [Reference Bezanson16Reference Samrakandi19].

As the demographic characteristics of the patients in the 17 hospitals reported earlier [Reference Sabria5, Reference Sabria6] were similar, we questioned why hospitals with L. pneumophila in their water distribution systems did not experience cases of hospital-acquired LD and hypothesized that the virulence of the L. pneumophila strains may have influenced the appearance of clinical cases. We therefore assessed the cytopathogenicity of L. pneumophila environmental strains isolated from each hospital and determined their relationship with sg1 and the number of different strain genotypes coexisting in the same water distribution system to gain insight into the contribution of cytopathogenicity and potential to cause disease in each hospital.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Bacteria and culture

A total of 22 environmental L. pneumophila strains from 17 hospital water-supply systems previously characterized [Reference Sabria5] by serogroup, and chromosomal DNA subtype by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) were included in the present study (Table 1). The bacteria had a ⩽2 passage history and were stored in brain heart infusion broth (Oxoid, Wesel, Germany) supplemented with 10% glycerol at −80°C. All strains were susceptible to 100 mm NaCl [Reference Byrne and Swanson20], a marker of laboratory attenuation (data not shown).

Table 1. DNA patterns, Legionella pneumophila serogroup, cytopathogenicity and number of cases of hospital-acquired Legionnaires' disease reported in each hospital during the surveillance period

CPED50, The CPED50 was defined as the minimum number of bacteria necessary to produce a cytopathic effect in 50% of the U937 cell infected monolayers after 72 h incubation; Non-sg1, L. pneumophila non-serogroup 1.

* Hospital that reported hospital-acquired Legionnaires' disease (1996–2001).

For cytopathogenicity and intracellular growth assays, strains were cultured on BCYE-α agar for 72 h and resuspended in antibiotic-free tissue culture medium containing 5% fetal calf serum (FCS).

Cytopathogenicity assay

The human monocyte cell line U937 was cultured in RPMI 1640, 2 mml-glutamine and 10% FCS. Prior to infection, the cells were differentiated for 72 h with 10−8m phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) (Sigma Chemical Co., St Louis, MO, USA) as described previously [Reference Pearlman21]. The relative cytopathogenicity of L. pneumophila strains was determined by the 50% cytopathic effect (CPE50). CPED50 was defined as the minimum number of bacteria necessary to produce a cytopathic effect in 50% of the U937 cell infected monolayers after 72 h incubation. Briefly, eight replicate monolayers containing 2×105 macrophage-like cells in 96-well microtitre plates were infected with serial dilutions of each strain (range of inocula, 101–109 bacteria per monolayer) for 90 min. The monolayers were washed and treated with 80 μg/ml of gentamicin and then incubated with RPMI containing 10% FCS at 37°C for 72 h. The monolayers were stained with tetrazolium salt 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5,-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT; Sigma) and the viability of the cells was determined measuring the optical density (OD) and expressed as percentage of cell death compared with uninfected cells using the formula

The number of bacteria that reduced the OD by 50% compared with the OD of uninfected cells was defined as the CPED50 value. Each experiment was performed in triplicate.

Intracellular growth

U937 macrophage-like cells plated at a density of 1×106 cells per well in 24 tissue culture dishes were infected at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0·2. Thereafter, extracellular bacteria were removed by washing the monolayers with RPMI followed by incubation with gentamicin in RPMI for 30 min. Intracellular growth was measured in duplicate at 0, 24 and 48 h and expressed as c.f.u./monolayer. Variations between experiments were corrected with the MOI value (dividing the result c.f.u./well by MOI). The relative increase in c.f.u. was calculated by subtracting the c.f.u. at each time-point from the first time-point.

Statistical analysis

Groups of cytopathogenicity were determined with the K means cluster analysis using SPSS software program version 12.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago IL, USA). The Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal–Wallis tests were used for statistical analysis of quantitative variables and Fisher's exact test was used for qualitative variables. P values <0·05 were considered significant.

RESULTS

All strains were able to infect and grow in macrophage-like cells and produce a significant cytopathic effect. Values ranged from log CPED50 2·67 c.f.u./ml to log CPED50 6·73 c.f.u./ml and five groups were determined, ranging from 1 (most) to 5 (least) cytopathogenic strains (Fig. 1). Cytopathogenic groups (1 and 2) had a higher intracellular infection efficiency (T=0 h, P=0·031). At 24 h all isolates showed increased intracellular growth to 2·05±0·74 log units (range 1·04–3·07) and at 48 h to 3·29±0·74 log units (range 1·75–4·93) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1. Cytopathogenic groups of the different environmental isolates. Data of each isolate are represented by a point and error bars represents standard deviations. Mean data of each cytopathogenic group is represented by a horizontal bar. Groups were established with the K means cluster analysis (SPSS). The CPED50 groups were statistically different (P<0·001, Kruskal–Wallis test).

Fig. 2. Intracellular growth of cytopathogenic groups of L. pneumophila isolates in co-cultures with U937 macrophage-like cell monolayers. •, Cytopathogenic group 1; ■, group 2; ○, group 3; ▲, group 4; ×, group 5. The values are the mean of groups and error bars represents standard deviations.

L. pneumophila sg1 strains had a significantly higher mean cytopathogenicity (log CPED50 4·92±1·28 vs. 5·75±0·68, P=0·003) and were distributed in the top three groups more frequently than other strains [50% (5/10) vs. 8·3% (1/12), P=0·06] (Table 1). Strains from hospital water systems harbouring more than one DNA type (PFGE) more often fell into the top three cytopathogenic groups than strains from systems that yielded a single genotype (3/5 vs. 2/12 hospitals respectively, P>0·05). Similarly, cytopathogenicity was greatest among strains from hospitals reporting hospital-acquired LD cases than those without clinical cases (4/11 vs. 1/6 hospitals respectively, P>0·05).

DISCUSSION

It is not clear why some hospitals with environmental colonization by L. pneumophila have nosocomial LD and others do not. This is often attributed to differences in engineering design and maintenance, bacterial concentration at peripheral points (taps and shower faucets) and host susceptibility. The virulence of the bacteria is also thought to play a major role.

We found that all environmental isolates of L. pneumophila tested were able to infect and grow in U937 macrophage-like cells resulting in a significant cytopathic effect. Almost three-quarters of the strains fell into weakly cytopathogenic groups and were invariably non-sg1; half of the 10 strains of sg1 were grouped as strongly cytopathogenic. Moreover, strains from mixed Legionella populations in water systems were more often cytopathogenic than those recovered in single strain culture and importantly, this association held for environmental strains from hospitals with cases of LD compared with those free of cases.

It is well established that Legionella spp. differ in virulence determined by cytopathogenicity and other assays and can be grouped accordingly [Reference Alli14, Reference Samrakandi19, Reference Fields22Reference O'Connell, Dhand and Cianciotto25]. However, there are few studies evaluating virulence traits of environmental isolates of L. pneumophila [Reference Marston, Lipman and Breiman10, Reference Molmeret18, Reference Neumeister24, Reference Luck26]. Most cases of disease are caused by sg1 strains and, consequently, it has been suggested that this serogroup is more virulent than other serogroups of L. pneumophila, but this has not been demonstrated experimentally [Reference Alli14, Reference Luck26, Reference Neumeister27].

The higher cytopathogenicity of L. pneumophila from mixed strain populations in water systems has not been previously described but our data are consistent with the finding of the coexistence of different L. pneumophila genotypes in cooling towers where the limitation of nutrients in the non-potable water induces an overgrowth of the most virulent strain and displacement of other strains leading to an outbreak of disease [Reference Ragull28]. Indeed, it has been demonstrated by in vitro studies that depleted nutrients enhance the expression of virulence traits [Reference Byrne and Swanson20]. The coexistence of more than one strain population in the hospital water distribution system may provide the microbial complexity to facilitate biofilm formation and intracellular growth in protozoa. L. pneumophila growing within amoeba changes phenotypically and exhibits increased invasion ability [Reference Cirillo, Falkow and Tompkins29] compared with cells grown in conventional media. The similarities in the model of intracellular infection between protozoa and alveolar macrophages [Reference Gao, Harb and Abu Kwaik30] suggest that the virulence of L. pneumophila for alveolar macrophages is a consequence of its evolution as a parasite of amoeba [Reference Swanson and Hammer31]. Thus, considering that protozoa are important determinants in the ecology of L. pneumophila in aquatic environments, studies to determine the different populations of amoeba in water supplies of hospitals and the ability of different strains to grow in them and alveolar macropages would be informative of the ecology and pathogenicity of the species.

Hospitals harbouring cytopathogenic strains of L. pneumophila strains in water supplies tended to report hospital-acquired LD cases more frequently. Unfortunately, owing to a lack of active surveillance clinical isolates were not available for comparison with the environmental isolates. However, several authors have noted the importance of strain virulence in the appearance of hospital-acquired LD since in hospitals colonized by more than one strain genotype, the clinical strain was often identical to the most virulent environmental strain [Reference Bezanson16, Reference Bollin17].

Some authors have pointed out that the presence of Legionella spp. in a hospital water distribution system, the use of specific techniques for the diagnosis of Legionella pneumonia and in-patient host factors such as immunosuppression, are the most important prognostic factors for the appearance of hospital-acquired cases [Reference Sabria and Yu1]. Nevertheless, since the complete eradication of Legionella spp. from a potable water distribution system is impossible without highly cost-effective disinfection methods, knowledge of the cytopathogenicity of an environmental Legionella spp. isolate may be useful in evaluating the risk of the emergence of hospital-acquired LD from a contaminated water source.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This study was supported by Grant FIS 98/1114, CB06/06/1089 and by Associació per la Investigació Biomédica en Malalties Infeccioses, Spain. EI CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES) is an initiative of ISCIII.

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

None.

References

REFERENCES

1.Sabria, M, Yu, VL. Hospital-acquired legionellosis: solutions for a presentable infection. Lancet Infectious Diseases 2002; 2: 368373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Best, M, et al. Legionellaceae in the hospital water supply-epidemiological link with disease and evaluation of a method of control of nosocomial Legionnaires' disease and Pittsburgh pneumonia. Lancet 1983; 2: 307310.Google Scholar
3.Johnson, JT, et al. Nosocomial legionellosis uncovered in surgical patients with head and neck cancer: implications for epidemiologic reservoir and mode of transmission. Lancet 1985; 2: 298300.Google Scholar
4.Stout, J, et al. Ubiquitousness of Legionella pneumophila in the water supply of a hospital with endemic Legionnaires' disease. New England Journal of Medicine 1982; 36: 466468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Sabria, M, et al. Presence and chromosomal subtyping of Legionella species in potable water systems in 20 hospitals of Catalonia, Spain. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 2001; 22: 673676.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Sabria, M, et al. Environmental cultures and hospital-acquired Legionnaires' disease. A five-year prospective study in twenty hospitals in Catalonia. Spain. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 2004; 25: 10721076.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Macfarlane, JT, et al. Erythromycin compared with a combination of ampicillin and amoxycillin as initial therapy for adults with pneumonia including Legionnaires' disease. Journal of Infection 1983; 7: 111117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Lettinga, KD, et al. Legionnaires' disease at a Dutch flower show: prognostic factors and impact of therapy. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2002; 8: 14481454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Garcia-Fulgueiras, A, et al. Legionnaires' disease outbreak in Murcia, Spain. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2003; 9: 915921.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Marston, BJ, Lipman, HB, Breiman, RF. Surveillance for Legionnaires' disease. Risk factors for morbidity and mortality. Archives of Internal Medicine 1994; 154: 24172422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Barker, J, et al. Relationship between Legionella pneumophila and Acanthamoeba polyphaga: physiological status and susceptibility to chemical inactivation. Applied Environmental Microbiology 1992; 58: 24202425.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Cirillo, JD, et al. Intracellular growth in Acanthamoeba castellanii affects monocyte entry mechanisms and enhances virulence of Legionella pneumophila. Infection and Immunity 1999; 67: 44274434.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Rowbotham, TJ. Current views on the relationships between amoebae, Legionellae and man. Israel Journal of Medical Sciences 1986; 22: 678689.Google ScholarPubMed
14.Alli, OA, et al. Comparative assessment of virulence traits in Legionella spp. Microbiology 2003; 149: 631641.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Joshi, A, Swanson, MS. Comparative analysis of Legionella pneumophila and Legionella micdadei virulence traits. Infection and Immunity 1999; 67: 41344142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Bezanson, G, et al. Virulence of patient and water isolates of Legionella pneumophila in guinea pigs and mouse L929 cells varies with bacterial genotype. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 1994; 40: 426431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Bollin, GE, et al. Difference in virulence of environmental isolates of Legionella pneumophila. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1985; 21: 674677.Google Scholar
18.Molmeret, M, et al. Different growth rates in amoeba of genotypically related environmental and clinical Legionella pneumophila strains isolated from a thermal spa. Epidemiology and Infection 2001; 126: 231239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Samrakandi, MM, et al. Genetic and phenotypic differences between Legionella pneumophila strains. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2002; 40: 13521362.Google Scholar
20.Byrne, B, Swanson, MS. Expression of Legionella pneumophila virulence traits in response to growth conditions. Infection and Immunity 1998; 66: 30293034.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Pearlman, E, et al. Growth of Legionella pneumophila in a human macrophage-like (U937) cell line. Microbial Pathogenesis 1988; 5: 8795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Fields, BS, et al. Comparison of guinea pig and protozoan models for determining virulence of Legionella species. Infection and Immunity 1986; 53: 553559.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Izu, K, et al. Grouping of 20 reference strains of Legionella species by the growth ability within mouse and guinea pig macrophages. FEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology 1999; 26: 6168.Google Scholar
24.Neumeister, B, et al. Multiplication of different Legionella species in Mon Mac 6 cells and Acanthamoeba castellanii. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 1999; 63: 12191224.Google Scholar
25.O'Connell, WA, Dhand, L, Cianciotto, NP. Infection of Macrophage-Like cells by Legionella species that have not been associated with disease. Infection and Immunity 1996; 64: 43814384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26.Luck, PC, et al. Analysis of Legionella pneumophila strains associated with nosocomial pneumonia in a neonatal intensive care unit. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 1994; 13: 565571.Google Scholar
27.Neumeister, B. Intracellular multiplication of Legionella species and the influence of amoebae on their intracellular growth in human monocytes: mono mac 6 cells and Acanthamoeba castellanii as suitable in vitro models. Methods in Molecular Biology 2004; 268: 141151.Google Scholar
28.Ragull, S, et al. Diversity of Legionella subtypes in cooling towers. Why only one environmental strain causes de clinical cases. In: Program and Abstracts of the 6th International Conference on Legionella. Chicago: American Society for Microbiology; 2005, pp. 64Google Scholar
29.Cirillo, JD, Falkow, S, Tompkins, LS. Growth of Legionella pneumophila in Acanthamoeba castellanii enhances invasion. Infection and Immunity 1994; 62: 32543261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30.Gao, LY, Harb, O, Abu Kwaik, Y. Utilization of similar mechanisms by Legionella pneumophila to parasitize two evolutionarily distant hosts, mammalian and protozoan cells. Infection and Immunity 1997; 65: 47384746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31.Swanson, MS, Hammer, BK. Legionella pneumophila pathogesesis: a fateful journey from amoebae to macrophages. Annual Review of Microbiology 2000; 54: 567613.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. DNA patterns, Legionella pneumophila serogroup, cytopathogenicity and number of cases of hospital-acquired Legionnaires' disease reported in each hospital during the surveillance period

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Cytopathogenic groups of the different environmental isolates. Data of each isolate are represented by a point and error bars represents standard deviations. Mean data of each cytopathogenic group is represented by a horizontal bar. Groups were established with the K means cluster analysis (SPSS). The CPED50 groups were statistically different (P<0·001, Kruskal–Wallis test).

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Intracellular growth of cytopathogenic groups of L. pneumophila isolates in co-cultures with U937 macrophage-like cell monolayers. •, Cytopathogenic group 1; ■, group 2; ○, group 3; ▲, group 4; ×, group 5. The values are the mean of groups and error bars represents standard deviations.