Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T07:40:00.543Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Brill–Zinsser disease; the possibility of its occurrence in Britain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

H. S. Lawy
Affiliation:
Bacteriologist, The Central Pathological LaboratoryGrimsby General Hospital
C. P. Beattie
Affiliation:
Professor of Bacteriology, University of Sheffield
H. J. Bensted
Affiliation:
Lately Director Central Public Health Laboratory, Colindale
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Of 318 Polish refugees now living in this country 30% gave a history of typhus fever; nearly half of these had complement-fixing antibodies to a titre of 1–5 or more to epidemic typhus. A further 12% without such a history similarly had these antibodies making a total of 22% of 318 refugees. None of the 174 British born controls had antibodies up to this titre.

2. Brill-Zinsser disease may occur from time to time among immigrants or visitors from typhus endemic areas to this country, but it is unlikely to be a serious problem.

3. The clinical diagnosis of Brill-Zinsser disease may not be easy because the characteristic rash is not always to be seen. Any patient of Eastern European origin or who has a history of typhus complaining of fever and severe headache should be examined serologically by the rickettsial agglutination or the complement-fixation test for specific epidemic typhus antibodies. The Weil-Felix reaction may be positive, but a negative result will not exclude a diagnosis of Brill-Zinsser disease.

We acknowledge with gratitude the help, interest and advice of Dr E. S. Murray, of the School of Public Health, Harvard University and Dr Janet Niven and also the technical assistance of Mr J. P. Brooks, FIMLT. We have to thank Messrs Lederle for their kindness in supplying the rickettsial antigens and in addition those who helped us to obtain the specimens and the volunteers who supplied them.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1958

References

Brill, N. E. (1898). N.Y. med. J. 67, 48, 77.Google Scholar
Brill, N. E. (1910). Amer. J. med. Sci. 139, 484.Google Scholar
Brochard, H., Choffel, C. & Gallouédec, C. (1954). Bull. mém. Med. Hôpit. Paris, 28/29, 1037.Google Scholar
Felix, A. (1944). Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 37, 321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawksley, J. C. & Stokes, E. J. (1950). Lancet, ii, 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolmer, J. A. & Boerner, F. (1941). Approved Laboratory Technique, 3rd Ed. New York: D. Appleton—Century Co. Inc.Google Scholar
Montoya, J. A., Jordan, M. E., Kramme, L., Quiros, S. C. & Fox, J. P. (1955). Amer. J. Hyg. 62, 255.Google Scholar
Murray, E. S., Baehr, G., Shwartzman, G., Mandelbaum, R. A., Rosenthal, N., Doane, J. C., Weiss, L. B., Cohen, S. & Snyder, J. C. (1950). J. Amer. med. Ass. 142, 1059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, E. S., Cohen, S., Jampol, J., Ofstrock, A. & Snyder, J. C. (1952). New Engl. J. Med. 246, 355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, E. S., Ofstrock, A. & Snyder, J. C. (1952). J. Immunol. 68, 207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, E. S., Pso˘rn, T., Djakovíc, P., Sielski, S., Broz, V., Ljupsa, F., Gaon, J., Pavlevíc, R. & Snyder, J. C. (1951). Amer. J. publ. Hlth, 41, 1359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, E. S. & Snyder, J. C. (1951). Amer. J. Hyg. 53, 22.Google Scholar
Plotz, H. (1943). Science, 97, 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, W. H. (1955). J. Bact. 69, 106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaefer, G. L., Friedman, M. & Lewis, C. (1955). Ann. intern. Med. 42, 979.Google Scholar
Steel, M. & Lawy, H. S. (1956). Lancet, ii, 174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terzin, A. L. & Gaon, J. (1956). Bull. World Hlth Org. 15, 299.Google Scholar
Weil, E. & Felix, A. (1916). Wien. klin. Wschr. 29, 33.Google Scholar
Zinsser, H. (1934). Amer. J. Hyg. 20, 513.Google Scholar