Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-8zxtt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T20:40:51.454Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Antibody against viruses in maternal and cord sera: specific antibody is concentrated on the fetal side of the circulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2010

P. D. Griffiths
Affiliation:
Virology Department, St Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London EC1A 7BE
S. I. Berney
Affiliation:
Virology Department, St Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London EC1A 7BE
S. Argent
Affiliation:
Virology Department, St Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London EC1A 7BE
R. B. Heath
Affiliation:
Virology Department, St Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London EC1A 7BE
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Paired maternal and cord sera from 100 pregnancies were tested for antibodies against herpes simplex virus, measles virus and respiratory syncytial virus by complement fixation and for antibodies against rubella virus, influenza A virus and influenza B virus by haemagglutination-inhibition. For four viruses (herpes simplex, measles, respiratory syncytial and rubella) higher levels of antibody were found in cord than in maternal sera. There was no difference between maternal and cord serum titres against influenza B virus but significantly higher levels of antibody against influenza A virus were found in maternal sera than in cord sera. This discrepancy was investigated by measuring antibodies against the surface antigens of influenza A by a complement fixation technique, and by single radial haemolysis. Both methods showed a preponderance of virus-specific antibody in cord sera. We conclude that IgG antibodies against most, if not all, viruses are concentrated on the fetal side of the circulation, but that conventional haemagglutination-inhibition techniques may fail to detect this difference.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

References

REFERENCES

Armitage, P. (1971). Statistical Methods in Medical Research. Oxford: Black well.Google Scholar
Brouwer, R., DeGroot, I. G. M. & Verheij, F. B. M. (1974). Comparison of maternal and cord serum titres for measles and for rubella antibodies. Archiv für die gesamte Virusforschung 44, 237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doherty, N., Ronalds, C. J., Pattison, J. R. & Heath, R. B. (1975). A comparative study of methods used for removing non-specific inhibitors of rubella haemagglutination from human sera. Medical Laboratory Technology 32, 317.Google ScholarPubMed
Griffiths, P. D., Campbell-Benzie, A. & Heath, R. B. (1980). A prospective study of primary cytomegalovirus infection in pregnant women. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 87, 308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griffiths, P. D., Ronalds, C. J. & Heath, R. B. (1980). A prospective study of influenza infections during pregnancy. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 34, 124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hawkes, R. A. (1979). General principles underlying laboratory diagnosis of viral infections. In Diagnostic Procedures for Viral and Rickettsial Infections, 5th ed. (ed. Lennette, E. H. and Schmidt, N. H.). American Public Health Association.Google Scholar
Heijtink, R. A., Backx, G., Van Der Horst, J. M. & Masurel, N. (1977). Complement fixation and neutralization RS antibodies in maternal and neonatal sera. Journal of Hygiene 78, 411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kohler, P. F. & Farr, R. S. (1966). Elevation of cord over maternal IgG immunoglobulin: evidence for an active placental IgG transport. Nature 210, 1070.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Longsworth, L. G., Curtis, R. M. & Pembroke, R. H. (1945). The electrophoretic analysis of maternal and fetal plasmas and sera. Journal of Clinical Investigation 24, 46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mantyjarvi, R., Hirvonen, T. & Toivanen, P. (1970). Maternal antibodies in human neonatal sera. Immunology. 18, 449.Google ScholarPubMed
Masurel, N., DeBruijne, J. I., Beuningh, H. A. & Schouten, H. J. A. (1978). Haemagglutination-inhibition antibodies against influenza A and influenza B in maternal and neonatal sera. Journal of Hygiene 80, 13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oxford, J. S., Schild, G. C., Potter, C. W. & Jennings, R. (1979). The specificity of the anti-haemagglutinin antibody response induced in man by inactivated influenza vaccines and by natural infection. Journal of Hygiene 82, 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitcher-Wilmott, R. W., Hindocha, P. & Wood, C. B. S. (1980). The placental transfer of IgG subclasses in human pregnancy. Clinical and Experimental Immunology 41, 303.Google ScholarPubMed
Russell, S. M., McCahon, D. & Beare, A. S. (1975). A single radial haemolysis technique for the measurement of influenza antibody. Journal of General Virology 27, 1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sarateanu, D. E., Ehrengut, W. & Fofana, Y. (1980). Influenza and corona-virus antibodies in the newborns and their mothers in Mali. Tropenmedizin and Parasitologie 31, 399.Google ScholarPubMed
Toivanen, P., Mantyjarvi, R. & Hirvonen, T. (1968). Maternal antibodies in human foetal sera at different stages of gestation. Immunology 15, 395.Google ScholarPubMed
Ventura, A. K., Ehrenkranz, N. J. & Rosenthal, D. (1975). Placental passage of antibodies to dengue virus in persons living in a region of hyperendemic dengue virus infection. Journal of Infectious Diseases 131, S62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar