Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T00:53:11.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An assessment of oil adjuvant and aqueous influenza vaccines: II. Antibody responses to the vaccines*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

J. R. L. Forsyth  and
Esther E. Russell
J. R. L. Forsyth
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, The Queen's University of Belfast, Northern Ireland
Esther E. Russell
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, The Queen's University of Belfast, Northern Ireland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In trials with polyvalent commercial influenza vaccines the antibody responses to oil-adjuvant vaccine persisted longer and were often higher. Antibody conversion was poor after all vaccines and delayed after adjuvant.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 65 , Issue 4 , December 1967 , pp. 497 - 504
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1967

References

REFERENCES

Appleby, J. C., Himmelweit, F. & Stuart-Harris, C. H. (1951). Immunization with influenza virus A vaccines. Lancet i, 1384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beare, A. S. (1962). Neutralization and haemagglutination-inhibition tests in a live influenza vaccine trial. Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth 21, 167.Google Scholar
Forsyth, J. R. L. (1962). Summer outbreak of influenza type B. Lancet i, 1400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forsyth, J. R. L. (1967). An assessment of oil adjuvant and aqueous influenza vaccines. I. Reactions to the vaccines. J. Hyg., Camb. 65, 485.Google Scholar
Himmelweit, F. (1960). Serological responses and clinical reactions to influenza virus vaccines. Br. med. J. ii, 1690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobson, D., Lane, C. A., Beare, A. S. & Chivers, C. P. (1964). Serological studies on adult volunteers inoculated with, oil-adjuvant Asian influenza vaccine. Br. med. J. ii, 271.Google Scholar
McCarroll, J.R. & Kilbourne, E.D. (1958). Equivalence of the subcutaneous and intradermal routes. New Engl. J. Med. 259, 618.Google Scholar
McDonald, J. C. & Andrews, B. E. (1955). Diagnostic methods in an influenza vaccine trial. Br. med. J. ii, 1232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medical Research Council Committee on Clinical Trials of Influenza Vaccine. (1955). Antibody responses and clinical reactions with saline and oil-adjuvant influenza virus vaccines. Br. med. J. ii, 1229.Google Scholar
Medical Research Council Committee on Clinical Trials of Influenza Vaccine. (1957). Br. med. J. ii, 1.Google Scholar
Medical Research Council Committee on Influenza and Other Respiratory Virus Vaccines. (1958). Trials of an Asian influenza vaccine. Br. med. J. i, 415.Google Scholar
Meiklejohn, C. & Bruyn, H. G. (1949). Influenza in California during 1947 and 1948. Am. J. publ. Hlth 39, 44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salk, J. E. & Laurent, A. M. (1952). The use of adjuvants in studies on influenza immunization. Measurements in monkeys of antigenicity of virus-mineral oil emulsions. J. exp. Med. 95, 429.Google Scholar