No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
An appraisal of methods used in the examination of retail samples of cows milk
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 October 2009
Summary
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
The use of the methylene blue test for the examination of cows milk was investigated in an inter-laboratory survey. A poor relationship was found between results of these tests and total viable counts. Coliforms were detected in a large number of pasteurized milks, indicating frequent post-pasteurization contamination. No relationship was found between the results of the methylene blue test and the presence of coliforms.
Results from this survey highlight the need for reappraisal of the methylene blue test as a statutory method for the examination of milk. A total viable count and coliform test are suggested for providing information regarding dairy hygiene and the quality of the product at the point of retail sale.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988
References
Black, R. E., Jackson, R. J., Tsai, T., Medvesky, M., Shayegani, M., Feeley, J. C., Macleod, K. I. E. & Wakelee, A. M. (1978). Epidemic Yersinia enterocolitica infection due to contaminated chocolate milk. New England Journal of Medicine 298, 76–79.Google Scholar
Council of the European Communities (1985). Council directive on health and animal-health problems affecting intra-Community trade in heat treated milk (85/397/EEC). Official Journal of the European Communities. No. L 226/13.Google Scholar
Frank, J. F., Hankin, L., Koburger, J. A. & Marth, E. H. (1985). Tests for groups of microorganisms. In Standard Methods for the Examination of Dairy Products, 15th edition (ed. Richardson, G. H.), pp. 189–201. Washington D.C.: American Public Health Association.Google Scholar
Gilchirst, J. E., Campbell, J. E., Donnelly, C. B., Peeler, J. T. & Delaney, J. M. (1973). Spiral plate method for bacterial determination. Applied Microbiology 25, 244–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britain, Great (1977). Food and Drugs, Milk and Dairies (Special Designation) Regulations 1977. (Statutory Instrument No. 1033). London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Britain, Great (1983). The Milk-based Drinks (Hygiene and Heat Treatment) Regulations 1983. (Statutory Instrument No. 1508). London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Britain, Great (1983). The Milk and Dairies (Heat Treatment of Cream) Regulations 1983. (Statutory Instrument No. 1509). London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Britain, Great (1986). The Milk and Dairies (Semi-skimmed and Skimmed Milk) (Heat Treatment and Labelling) Regulations, 1986. (Statutory Instrument No. 722). London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Greenwood, M. H., Coetzee, E. F. C., Ford, B. M., Gill, P., Hooper, W. L., Matthews, S. C. W., Patrick, S., Pether, J. V. S. & Scott, R. J. D. (1984). The microbiology of selected retail food products with an evaluation of viable counting methods Epidemiology and Infection 92, 67–77.Google ScholarPubMed
Greenwood, M. H. & Hooper, W. L. (1985). Yersina spp. in foods and related environments. Food Microbiology 2, 263–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, P. A. & Laguange, W. S. (1985). Coliform bacteria. In Standard Methods for the Examination of Dairy Products 15th edition (ed. Richardson, G. H.), pp. 173–187. Washington, D.C.: American Public Health Association.Google Scholar
Jacobs, M. J. & Gerstein, M. J. (1960). Handbook of Microbiology. Princeton N.J.: Van Nostrand Company, Inc.Google Scholar
Jenkins, H. R. & Henderson, R. J. (1969). The source of bacteria in fresh cream, and the methylene blue reduction test as a guide to hygiene quality. Epidemiology and Infection 67, 401–408.Google Scholar
Lück, H. (1981). Quality control in the dairy industry. In Dairy Microbiology, vol. 2, The Microbiology of Milk Products, (ed. Robinson, R. K.), pp. 279–324. London: Applied Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Miles, A. A. & Misra, S. S. (1938). The estimation of the bactericidal power of the blood. Epidemiology and Infection 38, 732–749.Google Scholar
Nelson, F. E. (1981). The microbiology of market milk. In Dairy Microbiology, vol. 1, The Microbiology of Milk. (ed. Robinson, R. K.), pp. 165–207. London: Applied Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Public Health Laboratory Service (1958). The bacteriological examination and grading of fresh cream: report of a working party of the Public Health Laboratory Service. Monthly Bulletin of the Ministry of Health 17, 77–87.Google Scholar
Public Health Laboratory Service (1971). The hygiene and marketing of fresh cream as assessed by the methylene blue test: report of a working party of the Public Health Laboratory Service, Epidemiology and Infection 69, 155–170.Google Scholar
Tacket, C. I., Narain, J. P., Sattin, R., Lofgren, J. P., Konigsberg, G., Rendtorff, R. C., Rausa, A., Davis, B. R. & Cohen, M. L. (1984). A multistate outbreak of infections caused by Yersinia enterocolitica transmitted by pasteurised milk. Journal of the American Medical Association 251, 483–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thatcher, F. S. & Clark, D. S. (1968). Microorganisms in Foods. 1. Their Significance and Methods of Enumeration. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Wauters, G. (1970). Contributions a 1'étude de Yersinia enterocolitica. Thèse Vander Louvain, Belgium.Google Scholar
Wilson, G. S., Twigg, R. S., Wright, R. C., Hendry, C. B., Cowell, M. P., Maier, I. (1935). The bacteriological grading of milk. Special Report Series of the Medical Research Council, No. 206. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
You have
Access