Skip to main content Accessibility help

Aetiologies of diarrhoea in adults from urban and rural treatment facilities in Bangladesh

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2014

International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b) Department of Clinical Trial and Clinical Epidemiology, Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b)
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b)
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b)
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b)
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b) School of Population Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b)
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b)
E-mail address:


The objective of our analysis was to describe the aetiology, clinical features, and socio-demographic background of adults with diarrhoea attending different urban and rural diarrhoeal disease hospitals in Bangladesh. Between January 2010 and December 2011, a total of 5054 adult diarrhoeal patients aged ⩾20 years were enrolled into the Diarrhoeal Disease Surveillance Systems at four different hospitals (two rural and two urban) of Bangladesh. Middle-aged [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0·28, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0·23–0·35, P < 0·001] and elderly (aOR 0·15, 95% CI 0·11–0·20, P < 0·001) patients were more likely to present to rural diarrhoeal disease facilities than urban ones. Vibrio cholerae was the most commonly isolated pathogen (16%) of the four pathogens tested followed by rotavirus (5%), enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) (4%), and Shigella (4%). Of these pathogens, V. cholerae (19% vs. 11%, P < 0·001), ETEC (9% vs. 4%, P < 0·001), and rotavirus (5% vs. 3%, P = 0·013) were more commonly detected from patients presenting to urban hospitals than rural hospitals, but Shigella was more frequently isolated from patients presenting to rural hospitals than urban hospitals (7% vs. 2%, P < 0·001). The isolation rate of Shigella was higher in the elderly than in younger adults (8% vs. 3%, P < 0·001). Some or severe dehydration was higher in urban adults than rural adults (P < 0·001). Our findings indicate that despite economic and other progress made, conditions facilitating transmission of V. cholerae and Shigella prevail in adults with diarrhoea in Bangladesh and further efforts are needed to control these infections.

Original Papers
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 


Diarrhoeal diseases remain a major public health problem, globally [Reference Kotloff1]. The incidence of diarrhoea has not declined significantly; however, deaths have been reduced due to better management, including the use of oral rehydration solutions, zinc, and antimicrobials for treatment of specific aetiological diarrhoeas such as cholera and shigellosis [Reference Kotloff1Reference Aggett7]. Although young children are the main group affected by diarrhoeal diseases, it is also a problem for adults [Reference Farthing8, Reference Liu9]. Diarrhoea is endemic in most countries and outbreaks and epidemics are common, the latter mostly occurring in developing countries – in both urban and rural areas [Reference Chowdhury10].

In developing countries, most diarrhoea episodes are caused by infection of the human intestine with enteric pathogens such as bacteria, virus, and parasites [Reference Fang11Reference de Magny13]. Transmission is mostly via the faecal–oral route, and water and food are the main vehicles for transmission, which is facilitated by inadequate knowledge, and poor hygiene practices and sanitatary conditions [Reference Chowdhury10, Reference Fang11]. Individuals with altered immune status, such as neonates and infants, the severely malnourished and the elderly are often at higher risk of diarrhoea [Reference Faruque2, Reference Parashar5]. In developing countries, infections due to Vibrio cholerae, enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC), rotavirus and Shigella are common [Reference Faruque2, Reference Farthing8].

In Bangladesh, cholera epidemics are often reported while cases frequently present to the facilities in a moribund state [Reference Chowdhury10]. Shigellosis has a worldwide distribution but predominates mostly in developing countries [Reference Edwards14]. A previous study in Bangladesh reported bacterial pathogens such as V. cholerae, ETEC, and Shigella as the most important causes of diarrhoeal illnesses in adults [Reference Faruque2]. On the other hand, rotavirus is the most important aetiological agent of diarrhoea in infants and young children worldwide [Reference Fang11, Reference Sanekata15], although this pathogen may also cause dehydrating diarrhoea in adults [Reference Sanekata15].

There is lack of information on the distribution of most common enteric pathogens, clinical features and disease severity in adult populations. There is also limited information on the distribution of diarrhoeal pathogens in adults, which may be different between urban and rural adult populations [Reference Faruque2, Reference Fang11]. We, therefore, conducted this study to describe the four common aetiologies, socio-demographic status, clinical characteristics of adults presenting with diarrrhoea and some or severe dehydration to two urban and two rural diarrhoea treatment facilities in Bangladesh.


Source of data and Hospital Surveillance System

The International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b) operates a Diarrhoeal Disease Surveillance System (DDSS) at two urban and two rural treatment facilities, to collect demographic information, presenting features, and severity of disease, and associated morbidities from patients systematically enrolled in the system. A 2% (every 50th patient) subsample from Dhaka Hospital and 10% (every 10th patient) from Mirpur Treatment Centre were enrolled systematically; whereas, all patients coming from the Health and Demographic Surveillance System (HDSS) area in Matlab and Mirzapur were included irrespective of age, sex, and disease severity. Faecal specimens of these patients underwent laboratory testing (microscopy, ELISA, culture) for detection of enteric pathogens.

Dhaka Hospital, established in 1962, provides cost-free care and treatment to the urban population of Dhaka, the capital of Bangladesh. This hospital currently treats around 140 000 patients with diarrhoea annually, with or without complications, and with or without associated health problems. The hospital has maintained a DDSS since 1979, and systematically enrols every 50th patient (since 1996) reporting to the triage area, regardless of age, sex, and disease severity.

Mirpur Treatment Centre is a 60-bed new urban hospital (established in 2009) and a relatively small facility located in Mirpur, a community in the north-west of Dhaka city. Around 15 000 patients are treated annually at this urban facility, and 10% (every 10th patient) of these patients are systematically enrolled in the surveillance system.

Kumudini Women's Medical College and Hospital (KWMCH) was established in 1938 in rural Mirzapur subdistrict (Tangail district), located about 60 km north-west of Dhaka. It is a charitable institution providing low-cost health services to the surrounding rural population. The hospital has separate outpatient and inpatient diarrhoea treatment units, and 20–25 inpatient beds to treat nearly 1500 diarrhoeal patients each year. To facilitate the present hospital-based prospective study, an active DDSS was established at the KWMCH. Moreover, the study enrolled all patients among the residents of the regional Demographic Surveillance System for a better understanding of the population-based disease burden.

Matlab Hospital of icddr,b was established in 1963. Matlab is a rural site located 57 km southeast of Dhaka. This hospital provides free care and treatment to 15 000–20 000 diarrhoeal patients living in the HDSS areas and other adjoining subdistricts, each year. All patients with diarrhoeal illnesses coming from the HDSS area are enrolled into the hospital surveillance system.


We defined diarrhoea as ⩾3 abnormally loose or watery stools during a 24-h period [16], and dysentery as visible or reported blood in ⩾1 stool [Reference Ferdous17]. We defined some dehydration as at least two signs/symptoms, including one key (*) sign present (irritable/less active*, sunken eyes, dry mucosa, thirsty, and reduced skin turgor* [Reference Alam18, 19]). Severe dehydration was defined as the presence of criteria for ‘some dehydration’ plus one of the following key (*) signs/symptoms (lethargy or unconsciousness*, unable to drink*, and uncountable/absent radial pulse* [Reference Alam18, 19]).

Body mass index (BMI) was defined as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in metres (kg/m2) [Reference Oyeyemi20].

Selection and sample size of study participants

Between January 2010 and December 2011; a total of 5054 patients aged ⩾20 years were enrolled in the surveillance systems at the four study hospitals with the following distribution: 3443 (68%) in two urban hospitals (2061 in Dhaka Hospital, 1382 in Mirpur Treatment Centre) and 1611 (32%) patients in rural hospitals (417 in Mirzapur Hospital, 1194 patients in Matlab Hospital). Among all patients, 42% were aged 20–39 years, 19% were aged 40–59 years and 8% were elderly (aged ⩾60 years) in urban hospitals; for rural hospitals the age distribution was 12%, 12% and 7%, respectively. The sampling distributions are described in Figure 1.

Fig. 1. Sampling frame.

Specimen collection and laboratory procedure

A single fresh whole stool specimen (at least 3 ml/g) was collected. Samples from Dhaka Hospital were submitted as soon as possible to the central laboratory located in Dhaka. For Matlab, faecal specimens were submitted to Matlab laboratory located in Matlab Hospital campus. All specimens from Mirpur and Mirzapur were transported to the central laboratory in Dhaka within 6 h of collection using a Styrofoam container with cold packs, maintaining a cool temperature (4–8 °C). Additionally, for Mirzapur and Mirpur, a faecal swab was collected from the stool specimen and inserted in Cary–Blair transport medium in a plastic screw-top test tube, each specimen was packed and labelled with the patients' identification number, and date and time of collection of the specimen. Rotavirus antigen [Reference Rahman21], ETEC (testing was performed only for Dhaka and Mirzapur sites) [Reference Qadri22], V. cholerae [16], and Shigella spp. [16] were detected using standard methods [Reference Talukder23Reference Das25].

Ethical statement

The DDSS of icddr,b is a routine ongoing activity of Dhaka Hospital, Matlab Hospital and Mirpur Treatment Centre which has been approved by the Research Review Committee (RRC) and Ethical Review Committee (ERC) of icddr,b. Since it is a routine ongoing activity as well as part of standard medical care, at the time of enrolment verbal consent was taken instead of written consent from the caregivers/guardians on behalf of the patients. The information is stored in the hospital database and used for conducting research. The ERC is satisfied with the voluntary participation, maintenance of the rights of the participants and confidential handling of personal information by the hospital physicians and has approved this consent procedure. The surveillance activities in Mirzapur have been approved by the RRC and ERC of icddr,b as a 3-year research protocol. Both informed written consent from adults or guardians, and assent from children aged 11–17 years was obtained during the study period of this research protocol.

Data analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS v. 15.5 (SPSS Inc., USA) and Epi Info v. 6.0 (USD, USA). For analysing socio-demographic characteristics, diarrhoeal patients were divided into three age groups [Reference Ogden26, Reference Das27]: (i) young adults (20–39 years); (ii) middle-aged adults (40–59 years); and (iii) elderly (⩾60 years), and the number of patients in these groups was 2751, 1564, and 739, respectively. For comparing major diarrhoeal aetiology, patients were categorized under two age groups: (i) 20–59 years as adults (for insufficient aetiological data) and (ii) ⩾60 years as elderly. For categorical variables, differences in the proportion were compared by χ 2 test and strengths of associations were estimated by calculating the odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A backward, step-wise logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the association between dependent (urban facilities = 1, rural facilities = 0) and independent variables with the probability of exclusion at P = 0·10. For this analysis, we combined the two urban facilities and similarly the two rural facilities, for better understating of the urban–rural differentials in diarrhoeal diseases in adults and the elderly.


The proportion of young adults (20–39 years) in all patients presenting with diarrhoea was higher in urban than rural areas (62% vs. 38%, P < 0·001). However, middle-aged (39% vs. 27%, P < 0·001) and elderly (22% vs. 11%, P < 0·001) more frequently presented to rural facilities than their urban counterparts. A single pathogen was identified in 28% of all specimens tested, where V. cholerae was the most commonly detected pathogen (16·4%) followed by rotavirus (4·7%), ETEC (4·4%), and Shigella (3·9%).

Clinical features

For analyses of clinical features, patients were stratified into three age groups: young, middle-aged and elderly. Fever and abdominal pain were more often reported by rural patients than their urban counterparts (21% vs. 2%, P < 0·001; 78% vs. 54%, P < 0·001), whereas watery diarrhoea was more often reported by urban patients (98% vs. 91%, P < 0·001) than patients in rural facilities. Diarrhoea duration was similar in urban and rural sites; however, some or severe dehydration was more frequently observed in young adult urban patients (20–39 years) followed by middle aged (40–59 years) and the elderly. The use of antimicrobials before attending the hospitals was higher in all three age groups of urban patients than the rural patients (Table 1). Other socio-demographic characteristics of study individuals are described in Table 1.

Table 1. Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of young adults, adults and elderly patients in urban and rural healthcare facilities, Bangladesh, 2010–2011

Comparisons of pathogens between rural and urban facilities

A higher proportion of all patients presenting with diarrhoea at urban facilities had an aetiology of V. cholerae (19% vs. 11%, P < 0·001), ETEC (9% vs. 4%, P < 0·001), and rotavirus (5% vs. 3%, P = 0·013) than at rural facilities. Shigella was more commonly detected in rural facilities compared to urban facilities (7% vs. 2%, P < 0·001). In urban hospitals, S. flexneri (1·4%) was the most common serogroup followed by S. boydii (0·6%), and S. sonnei (0·3%). In rural facilities, S. flexneri (4·9%) was also most common, followed by S. boydii (0·9%), S. sonnei (0·6%), and S. dysenteriae (0·3%) (Table 2).

Table 2. Isolation of pathogens in adult diarrhoeal patients in urban and rural healthcare facilities, Bangladesh, 2010–2011

ETEC, Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli.

a Comparison between urban and rural facilities for elderly patients aged ⩾60 years.

b Comparison between urban and rural facilities for adult patients aged 20–59 years.

c Comparison between all adults and elderly patients attending urban diarrhoeal facilities.

d Comparison between all adults and elderly patients attending rural diarrhoeal facilities.

Comparisons of pathogens between adult and elderly patients

The isolation rate of V. cholerae was higher in all young and middle-aged adult patients (20–59 years) than the elderly (18% vs. 10%, P < 0·001). Moreover, the isolation rate of V. cholerae was higher in urban adults (20–59 years; 20% vs. 12%, P < 0·001) and the elderly (20% vs. 12%, P = 0·082) than in the rural population. The isolation rate of Shigella was higher in the elderly than in adults irrespective of their age (8% vs. 3%, P < 0·001) and it was more often isolated in rural adults (20–59 years), and the elderly than the urban patient population. The isolation rates of S. flexneri, S. boydii, S. sonnei and S. dysenteriae were 8·6%, 1·1%, 0·6% and 0·2%, respectively in the rural elderly patient population. In rural adults, the isolation rates of S. flexneri, S. boydii, S. sonnei and S. dysenteriae were 4%, 0·9%, 0·7% and 0·2%, respectively. The isolation rate of ETEC was higher in urban adults than for those in rural areas (Table 2).

Multivariate analysis

Significant associations were found between areas and patients' age, male sex, illiteracy of patients, use of non-sanitary toilet, dysentery, duration of diarrhoea at home before visiting a health facility, dehydration status, fever, abdominal pain and use of antimicrobials at home. The significance of these associations were retained in multivariate analysis after controlling for the potential confounders such as monthly family income (>US$100), BMI, and number of watery/loose stools (>10 times) (Table 3). Patients presenting with diarrhoea at rural facilities were more likely to be middle aged and elderly. Clinical features like fever, dysentery, and abdominal pain were more often reported by rural patients compared to urban facility patients. Moreover, rural patients used non-sanitary toilets more often than their urban counterparts (Table 3).

Table 3. Characteristics of patients between urban and rural healthcare facilities, Bangladesh, 2010–2011

OR, Odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Outcome variables: age, male sex, illiteracy of patients, use of non-sanitary toilet, presence of fever, history of abdominal pain, dysentery, duration of diarrhoea, dehydration, and use of antimicrobials at home.

Main exposure: study area, urban vs. rural (diarrhoeal hospital facilities were the reference category).

Adjusted factors: monthly family income, body mass index, and frequency of stool (>10 times in last 24 h).

Antibiotic susceptibility

Of the two most frequently used antimicrobials for treating cholera cases, 85% of the V. cholerae isolates in Mirzapur and 84% in Mirpur were susceptible to azithromycin compared to 68% of the isolates in Dhaka. For ciprofloxacin, 88% of the V. cholerae isolates in Mirzapur and all isolates (100%) in Dhaka, Matlab, and Mirpur were susceptible. In Mirzapur, nearly 84% of Shigella isolates were susceptible to ciprofloxacin and mecillinam – both of these antimicrobials were often used for treating shigellosis. Between 10% and 61% of the isolates were susceptible to other antibiotics such as ampicillin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), and nalidixic acid (Table 4). In Dhaka, 62% and 70% of Shigella isolates were susceptible to ciprofloxacin and mecillinam, respectively; while in Matlab susceptibility of Shigella isolates to these antibiotics was 68% and 78%, respectively, and in Mirpur the figures were 78% and 67%, respectively (Table 4).

Table 4. Susceptibility pattern of Shigella and Vibrio cholerae isolated in different healthcare facilities, Bangladesh, 2010–2011 (aged ⩾20 years)

TMP-SMX, Trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole; n.d., not done.

a Comparison between Mirzapur and the other three sites.

b Comparison between Dhaka, Matlab and Mirpur sites.

c Comparison between Matlab and Mirpur sites.


We observed that the proportion of young adult patients (aged 20–39 years) was higher in urban diarrhoeal disease treatment facilities than in rural facilities. Rapid urbanization and rural to urban migration for better job opportunities leading to a higher proportion of younger population in this stratum [Reference ME28], as well as greater exposure of this group to potentially contaminated water and food consumed outside of the home are possible explanations.

In the rural areas, the proportion of females (being more susceptible to disease as well as its severity because of compromised immunity as well as more exposure during active participation in patient care) was higher than males, but the opposite was the case in the urban treatment centres. A similar observation was found in a previous study in urban Bangladesh with poor healthcare behaviour [Reference Perveen29], which might be the factor of gender dissimilarity between the rural and urban facilities in the present study.

The isolation frequency of V. cholerae was higher in adults (20–59 years) than the elderly. However, shigellosis was more frequent in the elderly compared to adults. Poor personal hygiene practices and an inadequate sanitation system are known risk factors for both Shigella and V. cholerae [Reference Mandal30, Reference Lee31], but Shigella was more prevalent in rural elderly as opposed to V. cholerae in urban adults. We do not have a ready explanation for this observation, although it may be that a higher proportion of the elderly population in rural areas with a more altered immune status due to increasing age could contribute to this observation [Reference Drewnowski32]. Additionally, among elderly individuals it is mostly females that participate in the active care of young grandchildren at the household level, these are often highly susceptible to shigellosis in endemic Bangladesh [Reference Ahmed33Reference Twamley35]. While contaminated water is the principal vehicle of transmission of V. cholerae, contaminated food and person-to-person transmission are the more likely the modes of transmission of Shigella. However, our data could not support the analyses to test these possibilities and this issue should be addressed in carefully conducted future studies.

Earlier studies have reported a higher incidence of dysentery or shigellosis in populations aged >40 years [Reference von Seidlein36], and a higher bacterial load in stool and complications due to compromised integrity of intestinal mucosa and host defence [Reference Sansonetti37]. Increased susceptibility to enteric infections due to altered intestinal function in the elderly has also been reported [Reference Kirk12]. Infectious diarrhoea is also associated with altered immune functions (such as decreased helper T-cells and their function, decreased mucosal IgA and antibody-forming potential, and increased numbers of gut coliforms) as a consequence of advancing age [Reference Faruque2, Reference Slotwiner-Nie38]. Our finding of a higher frequency of shigellosis in the elderly, a population increasing globally including developing countries like Bangladesh, and its higher morbidity will be important in monitoring and identifying risk factors to consider interventions for prevention of this illness in the elderly [Reference Sahlen39]. Although the prevalence of shigellosis has been falling in Bangladesh over the last three decades [Reference Khatun40], it is still considered as an endemic zone [Reference Kotloff1, Reference Khan41, Reference Bennish42].

In the present study, antibiotic use at home was higher in people attending urban facilities, irrespective of their age group. Overall, 53–75% of the V. cholerae isolates were susceptible to tetracycline. In Dhaka and Matlab, all isolates (100%) and in Mirzapur 88% of the strains were susceptible to ciprofloxacin. A previous study reported that multiple resistance to bacterial enteric pathogens and the genetic potency for antibiotic resistance development in the pathogen made the choice of efficient drugs difficult for the treatment of diseases caused by V. cholerae, which might also be true for our study [Reference Selianskaia43]. Shigella isolates were more susceptible to ciprofloxacin in Mirzapur than the other three facilities; whereas, the susceptibility pattern of another antimicrobial, mecillinam, was identical in the four facilities – these two drugs are most often used for treating shigellosis [Reference Bhattacharya44]. Irresponsible use of antimicrobials because of easy availability of antimicrobials over the counter, genetic mutation of the pathogens, host–pathogen–environment interactions, increasing minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) level of antimicrobials against certain pathogens, enhanced translocation of pathogens in the intestine due to malnutrition as well as its impact on the immune system lead to diverse susceptibility to antimicrobials. Moreover, changes in distribution of serotypes of pathogens, high population density leading to close contact with livestock, and high selective pressure as a result of unrestricted use of antimicrobials in veterinary medicine, poultry and aquaculture in Bangladesh and other developing countries [Reference Shah45Reference Rahman48].

In the present study, ETEC was isolated more often from urban adult patients aged 20–59 years than rural patients, such higher isolation in these individuals could be due to their frequent exposures to contaminated environment and inadequate hygiene practices [Reference Qadri49]. A previous study reported that the incidence of ETEC infections in developing countries decreases after age 5 years, is lowest in people aged 5–15 years [Reference Qadri49], and rises again to about 25% in adults [Reference Qadri49, Reference Merson50]. These observations corroborate with our study findings. In hospitalized Bangladeshi patients, severity of ETEC diarrhoea was greater in children and infants [Reference Qadri49], and ETEC, in terms of severity, was next to V. cholerae [Reference Faruque2]. The reasons for this may be due to both environmental and behavioural factors such as the result of ingestion of contaminated food or drink which may predispose to ETEC infection [Reference Qadri49, Reference Clemens51]; however, it was also true for the other three pathogens [Reference Tanaka24, Reference Mandal30, Reference Kotloff52]. A previous study stated that the infective dose of bacteria that an adult ingests is much higher than that of a young child, thus leading to severity of diseases being related to the size of the ingested inoculums [Reference Levine53], which could also be true for elderly people.

In case of rotavirus diarrhoea, the incidence was similar in elderly patients of both rural and urban facilities, but higher in patients attending urban facilities. This is probably due to the differences in the distribution of rotavirus types, as group B mostly accounts for adult diarrhoea [Reference Fang11] and may also cause dehydrating diarrhoea in adults [Reference Sanekata15]. Moreover, a previous study in Dhaka hospital of icddr,b reported on the higher probability of norovirus (43%) in adults aged ⩾18 years [Reference Rahman54]. As our study was not designed to look for these pathogens, further studies are needed to isolate pathogens like group B rotavirus and norovirus in the adult population.

The main limitation of our study is that of being a facility-based study as well examining only four enteric pathogens, so our findings may not represent large population data. Moreover, testing for more pathogens, in particular norovirus, may have increased the yield of pathogens identified. However, within this limitation, unbiased sample selection did show some rural–urban differences as well as differences in the distribution of pathogens by age group.

We observed that a higher proportion of patients presenting with diarrheoa were young adult patients (20–39 years) rather than elderly patients. V. cholerae was the most commonly isolated pathogen in adults in both urban and rural facilities. The elderly were more vulnerable to Shigella infection particularly in the rural population. Cholera and shigellosis are diseases related to poverty, lack of safe water and sanitation. Therefore, our findings indicate that despite economic and other progress made, conditions facilitating transmission of V. cholerae and Shigella prevail in Bangladesh. Therefore, efforts are needed to improve personal hygiene practices, provision of safe drinking water and better sanitation. Identifying pathogens of diarrhoeal disease may help to better understand appropriate treatment techniques.


We express our sincere thanks to clinical, epidemiological and laboratory personnel for their invaluable support and contribution in patient enrolment, data collection and laboratory activities. The Diarrheal Disease Surveillance System at the Mirzapur Hospital was funded by Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida), grant number MD-0020 and GR-00599. International Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b) acknowledges with gratitude the commitment of Sida to its research efforts. The Diarrheal Disease Surveillance System at the Dhaka Hospital, Matlab Hospital, and Mirpur Treatment Centre of icddr,b was funded by icddr,b and the Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh through its IHP-HNPRP. icddr,b acknowledges with gratitude the commitment of the Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh to its research efforts. icddr,b also gratefully acknowledges the following donors who provided unrestricted support to the Centre's research efforts: Australia Agency for International Development (AusAID), Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA), Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida), Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC), and the Department for International Development, UK (DFID). No additional current external funding sources have been acquired for this study. The donor(s) had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.




1. Kotloff, KL, et al. Burden and aetiology of diarrhoeal disease in infants and young children in developing countries (the Global Enteric Multicenter Study, GEMS): a prospective, case-control study. Lancet 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Faruque, AS, et al. Diarrhoea in elderly people: aetiology, and clinical characteristics. Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases 2004; 36: 204208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Bryce, J, et al. WHO estimates of the causes of death in children. Lancet 2005; 365: 11471152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Kosek, M, et al. The global burden of diarrhoeal disease, as estimated from studies published between 1992 and 2000. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2003; 81: 197204.Google Scholar
5. Parashar, UD, et al. The global burden of diarrhoeal disease in children. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2003; 81: 236.Google Scholar
6. Guerrant, RL, et al. Magnitude and impact of diarrheal diseases. Archives of Medical Research 2002; 33: 351355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Aggett, P, et al. Zinc and human health. Nutrition Reviews 1995; 53: S1622.Google ScholarPubMed
8. Farthing, MJ Diarrhoea: a significant worldwide problem. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 2000; 14: 6569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Liu, L, et al. Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality: an updated systematic analysis for 2010 with time trends since 2000. Lancet 2012; 379: 21512161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Chowdhury, F, et al. Impact of rapid urbanization on the rates of infection by Vibrio cholerae O1 and enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli in Dhaka, Bangladesh. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 2011; 5: e999.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Fang, ZY, et al. Investigation of an outbreak of adult diarrhea rotavirus in China. International Journal of Infectious Diseases 1989; 160: 948953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Kirk, MD, et al. Gastroenteritis and food-borne disease in elderly people living in long-term care. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2010; 50: 397404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. de Magny, GC, et al. Cholera outbreak in Senegal in 2005: was climate a factor? PLoS ONE 2012; 7: e44577.Google ScholarPubMed
14. Edwards, BH Salmonella and Shigella species. Clinical Laboratory Medicine 1999; 19: 469487.Google ScholarPubMed
15. Sanekata, T, et al. Human group B rotavirus infections cause severe diarrhea in children and adults in Bangladesh. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2003; 41: 21872190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. WHO. Manual for Laboratory Investigations of Acute Enteric Infections. Programme for control of diarrhoeal disease. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1987.Google Scholar
17. Ferdous, F, et al. Aetiology and clinical features of dysentery in children aged <5 years in rural Bangladesh <5 years in rural Bangladesh. Epidemiology and Infection 2014; 142: 9098.Google ScholarPubMed
18. Alam, NH, et al. Treatment of infectious diarrhea in children. Paediatric Drugs 2003; 5: 151–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. WHO. Treatment of Diarrhoea: a Manual for Physicians and Other Senior Health Workers. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1990.Google Scholar
20. Oyeyemi, AL, et al. Relationship of physical activity to cardiovascular risk factors in an urban population of Nigerian adults. Archives of Public Health 2013; 71: 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Rahman, M, et al. Genetic characterization of a novel, naturally occurring recombinant human G6P[6] rotavirus. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2003; 41: 20882095.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22. Qadri, F, et al. Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli and Vibrio cholerae diarrhea, Bangladesh, 2004. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2005; 11: 11041107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Talukder, KA, et al. Altering trends in the dominance of Shigella flexneri serotypes and emergence of serologically atypical S. flexneri strains in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2001; 39: 37573759.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24. Tanaka, G, et al. Deaths from rotavirus disease in Bangladeshi children: estimates from hospital-based surveillance. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 2007; 26: 10141018.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25. Das, SK, et al. Changing emergence of Shigella sero-groups in Bangladesh: observation from four different diarrheal disease hospitals. PLoS ONE 2013; 8: e62029.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26. Ogden, CL, et al. Prevalence of obesity in the United States, 2009–2010. NCHS Data Brief 2012; 82: 18.Google Scholar
27. Das, SK, et al. Lipoprotein status among urban populations in Bangladesh. Atherosclerosis 2012; 223: 454457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28. ME, H, et al. Rural to Urban migration and household living conditions in Bangladesh. Dhaka University Journal of Science 2012; 60: 253257.Google Scholar
29. Perveen, I, et al. Prevalence and health-care seeking pattern of patients with functional diarrhoea in an urban community of Bangladesh. Mymensingh Medical Journal 2010; 19: 8588.Google Scholar
30. Mandal, S, et al. Cholera: a great global concern. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine 2011; 4: 573580.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31. Lee, LA, et al. Hyperendemic shigellosis in the United States: a review of surveillance data for 1967–1988. International Journal of Infectious Diseases 1991; 164: 894900.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32. Drewnowski, A, et al. Impact of aging on eating behaviors, food choices, nutrition, and health status. Journal of Nutrition Health and Aging 2001; 5: 7579.Google Scholar
33. Ahmed, F, et al. Family latrines and paediatric shigellosis in rural Bangladesh: benefit or risk? International Journal of Epidemiology 1994; 23: 856862.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34. Boyce, JM, et al. Patterns of Shigella infection in families in rural Bangladesh. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 1982; 31: 1015–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35. Twamley, K, et al. UK-born ethnic minority women and their experiences of feeding their newborn infant. Midwifery 2011; 27: 595602.Google ScholarPubMed
36. von Seidlein, L, et al. A multicentre study of Shigella diarrhoea in six Asian countries: disease burden, clinical manifestations, and microbiology. PLoS Medicine 2006; 3: e353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37. Sansonetti, PJ, et al. Rupture of the intestinal epithelial barrier and mucosal invasion by Shigella flexneri. Clinical Infectious Diseases 1999; 28: 466475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38. Slotwiner-Nie, PK, et al. Infectious diarrhea in the elderly. Gastroenterology Clinics of North America 2001; 30: 625635.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39. Sahlen, KG, et al. Health coaching to promote healthier lifestyle among older people at moderate risk for cardiovascular diseases, diabetes and depression: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial in Sweden. BMC Public Health 2013; 13: 199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40. Khatun, F, et al. Changing species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of Shigella over a 29-year period (1980–2008). Epidemiology and Infection 2011; 139: 446452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41. Khan, AI, et al. Analysis of fecal leukocytes and erythrocytes in Shigella infections in urban Bangladesh. Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health 2006; 37: 747754.Google ScholarPubMed
42. Bennish, ML, et al. Mortality due to shigellosis: community and hospital data. Reviews of infectious diseases 1991; 13 (Suppl. 4): S245251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43. Selianskaia, NA, et al. In vitro induction of transmissive resistance to tetracycline, chloramphenicol and ampicillin chloramphenicol in Vibrio cholera non-O1/non-O139 serogroups isolated within 1990–2005 [in Russian]. Antibiotiki i Khimioterapiia 2012; 56: 1621.Google Scholar
44. Bhattacharya, D, et al. Antimicrobial resistance in Shigella – rapid increase & widening of spectrum in Andaman Islands, India. Indian Journal of Medical Research 2012; 135: 365370.Google ScholarPubMed
45. Shah, SQ, et al. Prevalence of antibiotic resistance genes in the bacterial flora of integrated fish farming environments of Pakistan and Tanzania. Environmental Science and Technology 2012; 46: 86728679.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
46. Hasan, B, et al. Antimicrobial drug-resistant Escherichia coli in wild birds and free-range poultry, Bangladesh. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2012; 18: 20552058.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
47. Hasan, B, et al. High prevalence of antibiotic resistance in pathogenic Escherichia coli from large- and small-scale poultry farms in Bangladesh. Avian Diseases 2012; 55: 689692.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
48. Rahman, M, et al. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-mediated third-generation cephalosporin resistance in Shigella isolates in Bangladesh. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2004; 54: 846847.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
49. Qadri, F, et al. Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli in developing countries: epidemiology, microbiology, clinical features, treatment, and prevention. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 2005; 18: 465483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
50. Merson, MH, et al. Disease due to enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli in Bangladeshi adults: clinical aspects and a controlled trial of tetracycline. International Journal of Infectious Diseases 1980; 141: 702711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
51. Clemens, J, et al. Development of pathogenicity-driven definitions of outcomes for a field trial of a killed oral vaccine against enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli in Egypt: application of an evidence-based method. International Journal of Infectious Diseases 2004; 189: 22992307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
52. Kotloff, KL, et al. Global burden of Shigella infections: implications for vaccine development and implementation of control strategies. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 1999; 77: 651666.Google Scholar
53. Levine, MM, et al. Immunity to enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. Infect Immun 1979; 23: 729736.Google ScholarPubMed
54. Rahman, M, et al. Molecular detection of noroviruses in hospitalized patients in Bangladesh. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 2010; 29: 937945.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.

Hostname: page-component-57c975d4c7-2h56n Total loading time: 0.755 Render date: 2020-11-24T11:07:03.030Z Query parameters: { "hasAccess": "1", "openAccess": "0", "isLogged": "0", "lang": "en" } Feature Flags last update: Tue Nov 24 2020 10:25:09 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) Feature Flags: { "metrics": false, "peerReview": true, "crossMark": true, "comments": false, "relatedCommentaries": false, "subject": true, "clr": false, "languageSwitch": false }

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Aetiologies of diarrhoea in adults from urban and rural treatment facilities in Bangladesh
Available formats

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Aetiologies of diarrhoea in adults from urban and rural treatment facilities in Bangladesh
Available formats

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Aetiologies of diarrhoea in adults from urban and rural treatment facilities in Bangladesh
Available formats

Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *