Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T02:39:37.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Useless Arithmetic: Why Environmental Scientists Can't Predict the Future

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2007

Kristan Cockerill
Affiliation:
Assistant Director for Research, Sustainable Development Program, Appalachian State University, ASU Box 32080, Boone, NC 28608-2080; (e-mail) cockerillkm@appstate.edu
Get access

Extract

Useless Arithmetic: Why Environmental Scientists Can't Predict the Future. O. H. Pilkey and L. Pilkey-Jarvis. 2007. Columbia University Press, New York. 230 pp. $29.95 paperback.

Humankind has a long history of seeking definitive answers to explain the complex systems operating on our home planet. Our tremendous success in calculating phenomena like atomic behavior and planetary movement has given us a false sense of confidence in our ability to calculate any and all phenomena. Our quest for definitive solutions to perceived problems has generated a sense of “physics envy” and driven many disciplines toward math-based predictive models. Orrin Pilkey and Linda Pilkey-Jarvis thoroughly discuss that our confidence in such models is misplaced. As a result, we are potentially increasing risk from natural hazards and have created a venue for ludicrous policy-based demands, such as certifying safety for tens of thousands of years at the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste repository.

Type
FEATURES & REVIEWS
Copyright
© 2007 National Association of Environmental Professionals

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bush, V. 1945. As We May Think. Atlantic Monthly (July).