Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T09:46:43.498Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

environmental conflict resolution: framing and intractability—an introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2005

craig b. davis
Affiliation:
school of natural resources, the ohio state university, columbus, ohio
Get access

Abstract

imagine this: the government is proposing that a new wildlife refuge be established in a rural area near your home city. wildlife officials claim that the refuge is needed to protect valuable wetlands in the area and provide needed habit for migratory waterfowl. they note that they have a responsibility to society to protect and preserve these resources for the public and for future generations. local and national supporters praise the proposal for its value in preserving biodiversity and protecting endangered species and ecosystems, but all are not happy with the proposal. one farmer, whose land would be included in the proposed refuge, noted, “my family has farmed this land for nearly 200 years and the government is not going to tell me what i can do with my land.” other landowners feel the same and organize to fight the refuge proposal.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2003 national association of environmental professionals

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)