Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-02T02:40:24.629Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

COMMENTARY: Developing a Method for Integrating Environmental Analysis into Proposed Plans, Policies, Programs, and Regulations in Washington State

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2005

Marvin L. Vialle
Affiliation:
The Paragon Consulting Group, Olympia, Washington
Pamela J. Sparks
Affiliation:
Environmental Consultant, Bremerton, Washington
Get access

Abstract

A sound environmental analysis of plans, policies, programs, and regulations can not only streamline the permit process when a specific project is later proposed, but can also identify long-range cumulative and indirect impacts. Washington State regulations direct early integration of state and local nonproject actions, which are defined as the adoption of plans, policies, and regulations. State rules, however, offer little guidance on how, when, and where to integrate the environmental analysis into the planning. As a result, the environmental analysis often does not meet the intent of state law and regulations. In 2001, the Washington State Department of Ecology initiated the development of an optional integrative planning process so that the incorporation of environmental values and issues could be more effectively reflected in local and state government decisions. Pilots covering a variety of plans, policies, and programs were conducted by several state and local agencies. The results indicated that the integration process for environmental analysis improved the clarity and efficiency of proposal development and augmented opportunities for public and agency input. The agencies conducting the pilots also noted that the approach resulted in improved planning documents, particularly in identifying objectives and refining the scope of a nonproject proposal. Although there are substantial benefits from this approach, resistance to this optional integrative planning process needs to be addressed through education, regulation, or other means.

Type
FEATURES & REVIEWS
Copyright
© 2005 National Association of Environmental Professionals

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bonde, J., and A. Cherp. 2000. Quality Review Package for Strategic Environmental Assessments of Land-Use Plans. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 18(2):99110.Google Scholar
Cherp, A. 2004. MiSt Program, Pilot Project 11, The Promise of Strategic Environmental Management. Draft work paper, 38 pp. Available at http://www.sea-mist.se.
Council on Environmental Quality. 1997. Considering Cumulative Effects under the National Environmental Policy Act. Council on Environmental Quality, Washington, DC, 64 pp.
Eccleston, C. H. 2003. Does NEPA Have Tao? Environmental Practice 5(4):287.Google Scholar