Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T23:38:42.316Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Japanese–American Environmental Conference, held at the Yokohama International Conference Centre, 24–28 July 1978

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Makoto Numata
Makoto Numata
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Chiba University, Chiba 280, Japan.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Conferences & Meetings
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 5 , Issue 4 , Winter 1978 , pp. 308 - 309
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* Asked to comment on an early draft of this report, the outgoing President of INTECOL wrote (in litt. 26 September 1978), ‘I fully accept your strictures and think they should stay in [to] help future organizers… I think a major weakness was the extent to which we depended on convenors and their judgement of the reliability and quality of speakers. This provided an extra link in the chain of unreliability. However, it was only our second Congress and presumably many of the same speakers and convenors will be suggested next time. The compilation of a “black list” would seem worth-while and inevitable!’Asked to comment on an early draft of this report, the outgoing President of INTECOL wrote (in litt. 26 September 1978), ‘I fully accept your strictures and think they should stay in [to] help future organizers… I think a major weakness was the extent to which we depended on convenors and their judgement of the reliability and quality of speakers. This provided an extra link in the chain of unreliability. However, it was only our second Congress and presumably many of the same speakers and convenors will be suggested next time. The compilation of a “black list” would seem worth-while and inevitable!’Asked to comment on an early draft of this report, the outgoing President of INTECOL wrote (in litt. 26 September 1978), ‘I fully accept your strictures and think they should stay in [to] help future organizers… I think a major weakness was the extent to which we depended on convenors and their judgement of the reliability and quality of speakers. This provided an extra link in the chain of unreliability. However, it was only our second Congress and presumably many of the same speakers and convenors will be suggested next time. The compilation of a “black list” would seem worth-while and inevitable!’Asked to comment on an early draft of this report, the outgoing President of INTECOL wrote (in litt. 26 September 1978), ‘I fully accept your strictures and think they should stay in [to] help future organizers… I think a major weakness was the extent to which we depended on convenors and their judgement of the reliability and quality of speakers. This provided an extra link in the chain of unreliability. However, it was only our second Congress and presumably many of the same speakers and convenors will be suggested next time. The compilation of a “black list” would seem worth-while and inevitable!’