Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T10:57:25.668Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fishermen and ‘The Tragedy of the Commons’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Fikret Berkes
Fikret Berkes
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Institute of Urban and Environmental Studies, Brock University, St Catharines, Ontario L2S 3A1, Canada.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Fish populations are classical examples of commonproperty resources and tend to decline over time. According to the conventional wisdom, they decline through a process popularly known as ‘the tragedy of the commons’, whereby selfish users are locked into a deterministic mechanism in which they are both the villains and the victims. However, the commons paradigm is not the model of reality for all fisheries. There are many sustainable fisheries, and detailed studies of some of them indicate that they do not fit the commons paradigm because there are factors which violate some of the hidden assumptions of the commons paradigm.

In many community-based and small-scale fisheries, there are unwritten regulations or customary laws that prevent individuals from maximizing their private gains at the expense of community interests. Far from being owned by no one and freely open to any user, many of the fish stocks of the world are under claims of ownership by communities of fishermen who exercise use-rights and who control access to the resource. As seen in examples from Oceania and North America's west coast, open-access and common property conditions were created, and the ‘tragedy’ started only after the destruction of such traditional marine tenure systems.

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , Autumn 1985 , pp. 199 - 206
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Acheson, J.M. (1975). The lobster fiefs: economic and ecological effects of territoriality in the Maine lobster industry. Human Ecology, 3, pp. 183–207.Google Scholar
Acheson, J.M. (1981). Anthropology of fishing. Annual Review of Anthropology, 10, pp. 175–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, R. (1976). The small island society and coastal resource management: the Bermudan experience. Pp. 255–77 in Marine Policy and the Coastal Community (Ed. Johnston, D.M.). Croom Helm, London, UK: [not available for checking].Google Scholar
Andersen, R. (1979). Public and private access management in Newfoundland fishing. Pp. 299–336 in North Atlantic Maritime Cultures (Ed. Andersen, R.). Mouton, The Hague, Netherlands: xv + 365 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Asada, Y. (1973). Licence limitation regulations: the Japanese system. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 30, pp. 2085–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barsh, R.L. (1982). The economics of a traditional coastal Indian salmon fishery. Human Organization, 41, pp. 170–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkes, F. (1977). Fishery resource use in a subarctic Indian community. Human Ecology, 5, pp. 289–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkes, F. (1981). Fisheries of the James Bay area and northern Quebec: a case-study in resource management. Pp. 143–60 in Renewable Resources and the Economy of the North (Ed. Freeman, M.M.R.). Association of Canadian Universities for Northern Research and the Canada Man and the Biosphere Program, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: v + 268 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Berkes, F. (1983). The Creation of Limited Property Rights as a Fisheries Management Policy. Paper presented at the Learned Societies Conference, Vancouver B.C., Canada: 15 pp. (mimeogr.).Google Scholar
Berkes, F. & Pocock, D. (1981). Self-regulation of commercial fisheries of the outer Long Point Bay, Lake Erie. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 7, pp. 111–6.Google Scholar
Cordell, J. (1978). Carrying capacity analysis of fixed-territorial fishing. Ethnology, 17, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
Cove, J.J. (1973). Hunters, trappers, and gatherers of the sea: a comparative study of fishing strategies. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 30, pp. 249–59.Google Scholar
Davis, A. (1983). Property Rights and Access Management in the Small-boat Fishery: a Case-study from Southwest Nova Scotia. Paper presented at the Learned Societies Conference, Vancouver, B.C., Canada: 56 pp. (mimeogr.).Google Scholar
Gordon, H.S. (1954). The economic theory of a common-property resource: the fishery. Journal of Political Economy, 62, pp. 124–42.Google Scholar
Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, pp. 1243–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hardin, G. (1978). Political requirements for preserving our common heritage. Pp. 310–7 in Wildlife and America (Ed. Brokaw, H.P.). Council on Environmental Quality, Washington, DC, USA: ix + 532 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Johannes, R.E. (1978). Traditional marine conservation methods in Oceania and their demise. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 9, pp. 349–64.Google Scholar
Johannes, R.E. (1981). Words of the Lagoon: Fishing and Marine Lore in the Palau District of Micronesia. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, USA: xiv + 245 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Klee, G.A. (1980). Oceania. Pp. 245–81 in World Systems of Traditional Resource Management (Ed. Klee, G.A.). V.H. Winston & Sons, New York, NY, USA: ix + 290 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Lamb, R. [P.] (1981). Learning conservation from the Bedouin. Environmental Conservation, 8(2), p. 106.Google Scholar
McCay, B.J. (1980). A fishermen's cooperative, limited: indigenous resource management in a complex society. Anthropological Quarterly, 53, pp. 29–38.Google Scholar
McGuire, T.R. (1983). The political economy of shrimping in the Gulf of California. Human Organization, 42, pp. 132–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, K.O. (1979). Play by the rules or don't play at all: space division and resource allocation in a rural Newfoundland fishing community. Pp. 277–98 in North American Maritime Cultures (Ed. Andersen, R.). Mouton, The Hague, Netherlands: xv + 365 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Miller, D.L. (1982). Construction of shallow-water habitat to increase lobster production in Mexico. Proceedings of the Gulf and Caribbean Fisheries Institute, 34, pp. 168–79.Google Scholar
Nietschmann, B. (1972). Hunting and fishing forms among the Miskito Indians, eastern Nicaragua. Human Ecology, 1, pp. 41–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ophuls, W. (1977). Ecology and the Politics of Scarcity. W.H. Freeman & Company, San Francisco, California, USA: xi + 303 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Pollnac, R.B. (1976). Continuity and Change in Marine Fishing Communities. Anthropology Working Paper No. 10, University of Rhode Island, Providence, Rhode Island, USA: 111 pp. (mimeogr.).Google Scholar
Richardson, A. (1982). The control of productive resources on the northwest coast of North America. Pp. 93–112 in Resource Managers: North American and Australian Hunter-Gatherers (Eds Williams, N.M. & Hunn, E.S.). AAAS Selected Symposium 67, Washington, DC, USA: xi + 267 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Rogers, G.W. (1979). Alaska's limited entry program: another view. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 36, pp. 783–8.Google Scholar
Speth, W.W. (1977). Carl Ortwin Sauer on destructive exploitation. Biological Conservation, 11, pp. 145–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stillman, P.G. (1975). The tragedy of the commons: a re-analysis. Alternatives, 4(2), pp. 12–5.Google Scholar
Thomson, D. (1980). Conflict within the fishing industry. ICLARM Newsletter, 3, pp. 3–4.Google Scholar
Watson, D.J. (1982). Subsistence fish exploitation and implications for management in the Baram River system, Sarawak, Malaysia. Fisheries Research, 1, pp. 299–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar