Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T02:54:49.151Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Environmental Education as Educational Reform

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Ian Robottom
Ian Robottom
Affiliation:
Senior Lecturer, School of Education, Deakin University, Geelong 3217, Australia.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Ten years on from the landmark environmental education conference at Tbilisi, it is salutary to reflect on the extent to which some of the distinguishing characteristics espoused in the nineteen-seventies are manifest in environmental education of the 'eighties. The critical problem-solving interest of environmental education recommended in the literature of the 'seventies was consistent with the social/political concerns of the world community at the time—concerns to which the UNESCO environmental education programme was a response. However, this critical problem-solving interest is not commonplace in schools, and still represents a serious challenge to the existing patterns of schooling. Consequently the position that environmental education should entail widespread educational reform is nowadays becoming stronger and more evident.

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , Autumn 1987 , pp. 197 - 200
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon. (1982). Declaration: The World Campaign for The Biosphere. Environmental Conservation, 9(2), pp. 91–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fensham, P. (1976). Report on the Belgrade Conference on Environmental Education. Curriculum Development Centre, Canberra, Australia: 26 pp.Google Scholar
Fensham, P. (1978). Stockholm to Tbilisi—the evolution of environmental education. Prospects, VIII(4), pp. 446–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IUCN (1970). Definition of Environmental Education, as cited in Greenall, A. (1978). Environmental Education Teachers' Handbook. Longman Cheshire, Melbourne, Australia: vi + 153pp.Google Scholar
Polunin, N. (1982). Our global environment and the World Campaign for The Biosphere. Environmental Conservation, 9(2), pp. 115–21, 2 figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polunin, N. (1984). Geneses and progress of the World Campaign and Council For The Biosphere. Environmental Conservation, 11(4), pp. 293–8, 2 figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robottom, I. & Walsh, M. (1987). Report on the Teacher Education Workshop. [Mimeograph of the] Third National Seminar and Worshops (Ursula College, Australian National University, Canberra) organized by the Commonwealth Department of Arts, Heritage and Environment, 10–13 02, 5 pp. (mimeogr.).Google Scholar
Schmeider, A. (1977). The nature and philosophy of environmental education: goals and objectives. Pp. 23–34 in Trends in Environmental Education. UNESCO, Paris, France: 244 PP.Google Scholar
UNESCO (1980). Environmental Education in the Light of the Tbilisi Conference. UNESCO, Paris, France: 100 pp.Google Scholar
Vallentyne, J.R. (1984). Towards a symbol for the World Campaign for The Biosphere. Environmental Conservation, 11(4), pp. 309–12, fig.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Withrington, D. (1977). The UNESCO/UNEP Environmental Programme and its implications for British EE. Pp. 33–42 in Environmental Education: Key Issues of the Future (Ed. Hughes-Evans, D.). Pergamon Press, Oxford, England, UK: x + 82 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worthington, E.B. (1982). World Campaign for The Biosphere. Environmental Conservation, 9(2), pp. 93–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar