Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T12:38:52.661Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Documentation of a 2,4-D Accident*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Edwin Kessler
Affiliation:
Director, National Severe Storms Laboratory, 1313 Halley Circle, Norman, Oklahoma 73069, U.S.A.; Adjunct Professor, Department of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma.

Extract

Apparent effects of 2,4-D (2,4 dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, amine form) on some flora and fauna were observed following aerial application, under adverse meteorological conditions, of the chemical for control of Perennial Ragweed (Ambrosia psilostachya) in pasture, on the Author's farm in Oklahoma. Ragweed was greatly reduced, but there was widespread damage to a whole range of garden crops and trees, a few of which were killed. Damage to some tree species began to be reversed a few weeks after the spraying, but with others, sitespecific infestations of Spring Cankerworm and Fungi greatly extended the period of damaging conditions.

Type
Main Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Audus, L. J., (Ed.) (1964). The Physiology and Biochemistry of Herbicides. Academic Press, London & New York: xix + 555 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Bell, H. M. (1973). Rangeland Management for Livestock Production. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, Oklahoma: xv + 303 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Carter, L. (1977). Soil erosion: the problem persists despite the billions spent on it. Science, 196, pp. 409–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooperative Extension Service (1975). Broadleaf and aquatic weed control in rice. Leaflet 469 (Univ. of Arkansas Division of Agriculture and US Dept of Agriculture). [Not available for checking.]Google Scholar
Council for Agricultural Science and Technology (1978). The Phenoxy Herbicides, Second edition. Headquarters Office, Agronomy Building, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011: 28 pp.Google Scholar
Erne, K. (1966). Studies on the animal metabolism of phenoxyacetic herbicides. Acta Vet. Scand., 7, pp. 264–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Menzie, C. M. (1969). Metabolism of pesticides. Pp. 121–6 in Special Scientific Report—Wildlife. U.S. Dept of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, No. 127, 487 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Menzie, C. M. (1974). Metabolism of pesticides—an update. Pp. 109–28 in Special Scientif Report—Wildlife. U.S. Dept of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, No. 184, xxvi + 486 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
N.Y. Times (1979). Agent Orange—a legacy of suspicion. [A series of three articles by Richard Severo, 05 27, 28, 29.]Google Scholar
Oka, J. N. & Pimentel, D. (1976). Herbicide (2,4-D) increases insect and pathogen pest on corn. Science, 193, pp. 239–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pimentel, D., Terhune, E. C., Dyson-Hudson, R., Rocherau, S., Samis, R., Smith, E. A., Denman, D., Reifschneider, D. & Shepard, M. (1976). Land degradation: effects on food and energy resources. Science, 194, pp. 149–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weaver, J. E. (1968). Prairie Plants and their Environment. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, Nebraska: xi + 276 pp., illustr.Google Scholar