Skip to main content Accessibility help

Correlates of long-term land-cover change and protected area performance at priority conservation sites in Africa



The loss of natural habitats is a major threat to biodiversity, and protected area designation is one of the standard responses to this threat. However, greater understanding of the drivers of habitat loss and of the circumstances under which protected areas succeed or fail is still needed. We use visual assessment of satellite images to quantify land-cover change over periods of up to 30 years in and around a matched sample of protected and unprotected Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas (IBAs) in Africa. We modelled the annual survival of forests and other natural land covers as a function of a range of environmental and anthropic predictors of plausible drivers. The best-supported model indicated that survival rates of natural land cover were highest in steeper areas, at higher altitudes, in areas with lower human population densities and in areas where the cover of natural habitats was already higher at the start of the period. Survival rates of natural land cover in protected areas were, on average, around twice those in unprotected areas, but the differences between them varied along different environmental gradients. The overall survival rates of both protected and unprotected forests were significantly lower than those of other natural land-cover types, but the net benefit of protection, in terms of the absolute difference in rates of loss between protected and unprotected sites, was higher in forests. Interaction terms indicated that as slope and altitude increased, the natural protection offered by topography increasingly nullified the additional benefits of legislative protection. Furthermore, protected area designation offered reduced additional benefits to the survival of natural land cover in areas where rates of conversion were higher at the start of the observation period. Variation in the impacts of protected area status along different environmental gradients indicates that targets to improve the world's protected area network, such as Aichi Target 11 of the Convention on Biological Diversity, need to look beyond simple area-based metrics. Our methods and results contribute to the development of a protocol for prioritizing places where protection is likely to have the greatest effect.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Correlates of long-term land-cover change and protected area performance at priority conservation sites in Africa
      Available formats

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Correlates of long-term land-cover change and protected area performance at priority conservation sites in Africa
      Available formats

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Correlates of long-term land-cover change and protected area performance at priority conservation sites in Africa
      Available formats


Corresponding author

*Correspondence: Alison E. Beresford email:


Hide All
Ahrends, A., Burgess, N.D., Milledge, S.A.H., Bulling, M.T., Fisher, B., Smart, J.C.R., Clarke, G.P., Mhoro, B.E. & Lewis, S.L. (2010) Predictable waves of sequential forest degradation and biodiversity loss spreading from an African city. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107: 1455614561.
Andam, K.S., Ferraro, P.J., Pfaff, A., Sanchez-Azofeifa, G.A. & Robalino, J.A. (2008) Measuring the effectiveness of protected area networks in reducing deforestation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105: 1608916094.
Bartoń, K. (2012) MuMIn: multi-model inference: R package [www document]. URL
Bastin, L., Buchanan, G., Beresford, A., Pekel, J.F. & Dubois, G. (2013) Open-source mapping and services for Web-based land-cover validation. Ecological Informatics 14: 916.
Beresford, A.E., Buchanan, G.M., Sanderson, F.J., Jefferson, R. & Donald, P.F. (2016) The contributions of the EU Nature Directives to the CBD and other multilateral environmental agreements. Conservation Letters 9: 479488.
Beresford, A.E., Eshiamwata, G.W., Donald, P.F., Balmford, A., Bertzky, B., Brink, A.B., Fishpool, L.D.C., Mayaux, P., Phalan, B., Simonetti, D. & Buchanan, G.M. (2013) Protection reduces loss of natural land-cover at sites of conservation importance across Africa. PLoS ONE 8: e65370.
BirdLife International (2011) Important Bird Areas [www document]. URL
Boakes, E.H., Mace, G.M., McGowan, P.J.K. & Fuller, R.A. (2010) Extreme contagion in global habitat clearance. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 277: 10811085.
Brun, C., Cook, A.R., Lee, J.S.H., Wich, S.A., Koh, L.P. & Carrasco, L.R. (2015) Analysis of deforestation and protected area effectiveness in Indonesia: a comparison of Bayesian spatial models. Global Environmental Change – Human and Policy Dimensions 31: 285295.
Buchanan, G.M., Donald, P.F., Fishpool, L.D.C., Arinaitwe, J.A., Balman, M. & Mayaux, P. (2009) An assessment of land cover and threats in Important Bird Areas in Africa. Bird Conservation International 19: 4961.
Butsic, V., Baumann, M., Shortland, A., Walker, S. & Kuemmerle, T. (2015) Conservation and conflict in the Democratic Republic of Congo: the impacts of warfare, mining, and protected areas on deforestation. Biological Conservation 191: 266273.
CIESIN & CIAT (2005) Gridded population of the World version 3 (GPWv3): population density grids [www document]. URL
Di Gregorio, A. & Jansen, L.J. (2000) Land Cover Classification System (LCCS): Classification Concepts and User Manual. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Ewers, R.M. & Rodrigues, A.S.L. (2008) Estimates of reserve effectiveness are confounded by leakage. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 23: 113116.
Fischer, G., van Velthuizen, H., Shah, M. & Nachtergaele, F. (2002) Global Agro-ecological Assessment for Agriculture in the 21st Century: Methodology and Results. Laxenburg, Austria and Rome, Italy: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis/Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Fisher, B. (2010) African exception to drivers of deforestation. Nature Geoscience 3: 375376.
Fishpool, L.D.C. & Evans, M.I. (2001) Important Bird Areas in Africa and Associated Islands: Priority Sites for Conservation. Newbury and Cambridge, UK: Pisces Publications and Birdlife International.
Francoso, R.D., Brandao, R., Nogueira, C.C., Salmona, Y.B., Machado, R.B. & Colli, G.R. (2015) Habitat loss and the effectiveness of protected areas in the Cerrado Biodiversity Hotspot. Natureza & Conservacao 13: 3540.
Gaveau, D.L.A., Epting, J., Lyne, O., Linkie, M., Kumara, I., Kanninen, M. & Leader-Williams, N. (2009) Evaluating whether protected areas reduce tropical deforestation in Sumatra. Journal of Biogeography 36: 21652175.
Geldmann, J., Barnes, M., Coad, L., Craigie, I.D., Hockings, M. & Burgess, N.D. (2013) Effectiveness of terrestrial protected areas in reducing habitat loss and population declines. Biological Conservation 161: 230238.
Ho, D.E., Imai, K., King, G. & Ferrer, E.A. (2011) MatchIt: nonparametric preprocessing for parametric causal inference. Journal of Statistical Software 42: 128.
IUCN & UNEP-WCMC (2010) The World Database on Protected Areas [www document]. URL
IUCN (2016) A Global Standard for the Identification of Key Biodiversity Areas, Version 1.0. First Edition. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.
Jenness, J., Dooley, J., Aguilar-Manjarrez, J. & Riva, C. (2007) African Water Resource Database. GIS-based Tools for Inland Aquatic Resource Management. 1. Concepts and Application Case Studies. CIFA Technical Paper. No. 33, Parts 1 & 2. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Joppa, L.N. & Pfaff, A. (2009) High and far: biases in the location of protected areas. PLoS ONE, 4: e8273.
Joppa, L.N. & Pfaff, A. (2011) Global protected area impacts. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 278: 16331638.
Loarie, S.R., Duffy, P.B., Hamilton, H., Asner, G.P., Field, C.B. & Ackerly, D.D. (2009) The velocity of climate change. Nature 462: 10521055.
Mayaux, P., Bartholomé, E., Fritz, S. & Belward, A. (2004) A new land-cover map of Africa for the year 2000. Journal of Biogeography 31: 861877.
Nakagawa, S. & Schielzeth, H. (2013) A general and simple method for obtaining R 2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 4: 133142.
National Imagery and Mapping Agency (2000) Vector Map Level 0 (Digital Chart of the World) [www document]. URL
Nelson, A. (2008) Estimated travel time to the nearest city of 50,000 or more people in year 2000 [www document]. URL
Nelson, A. & Chomitz, K.M. (2011) Effectiveness of strict vs. multiple use protected areas in reducing tropical forest fires: a global analysis using matching methods. PLoS ONE 6: e22722.
Olson, D.M., Dinerstein, E., Wikramanayake, E.D., Burgess, N.D., Powell, G.V.N., Underwood, E.C., D'amico, J.A., Itoua, I., Strand, H.E., Morrison, J.C., Colby, J.L., Allnutt, T.F., Ricketts, T.H., Kura, Y., Lamoreux, J.F., Wettengel, W.W., Hedao, P. & Kassem, K.R. (2001) Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on Earth. Bioscience 51: 933938.
Paiva, R.J.O., Brites, R.S. & Machado, R.B. (2015) The role of protected areas in the avoidance of anthropogenic conversion in a high pressure region: a matching method analysis in the core region of the Brazilian Cerrado. PLoS ONE 10: e0132582.
Pereira, H.M., Leadley, P.W., Proenca, V., Alkemade, R., Scharlemann, J.P.W., Fernandez-Manjarres, J.F., Araujo, M.B., Balvanera, P., Biggs, R., Cheung, W.W.L., Chini, L., Cooper, H.D., Gilman, E.L., Guenette, S., Hurtt, G.C., Huntington, H.P., Mace, G.M., Oberdorff, T., Revenga, C., Rodrigues, P., Scholes, R.J., Sumaila, U.R. & Walpole, M. (2010) Scenarios for global biodiversity in the 21st century. Science 330: 14961501.
Pfaff, A., Robalino, J., Lima, E., Sandoval, C. & Herrera, D. (2014) Governance, location and avoided deforestation from protected areas: greater restrictions can have lower impact, due to differences in location. World Development 55: 720.
Pfaff, A., Robalino, J., Sandoval, C. & Herrera, D. (2015a) Protected area types, strategies and impacts in Brazil's Amazon: public PA strategies do not yield a consistent ranking of PA types by impact. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 370: 20140273.
Pfaff, A., Robalino, J., Herrera, D. & Sandoval, C. (2015b) Protected areas’ impacts on Brazilian Amazon deforestation: examining conservation – development interactions to inform planning. PLoS ONE 10: e0129460.
R Development Core Team (2010) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Ramankutty, N., Evan, A.T., Monfreda, C. & Foley, J.A. (2008) Farming the planet: 1. Geographic distribution of global agricultural lands in the year 2000. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 22: GB1003.
Robalino, J.A., Pfaff, A. & Villalobos, L. (2015) Deforestation Spillovers from Costa Rican Protected Areas. LACEEP Working Paper Series. San José, Costa Rica: Universidad de Costa Rica.
Scharlemann, J.P.W., Kapos, V., Campbell, A., Lysenko, I., Burgess, N.D., Hansen, M.C., Gibbs, H.K., Dickson, B. & Miles, L. (2010) Securing tropical forest carbon: the contribution of protected areas to REDD. Oryx 44: 352357.
Selig, E.R. & Bruno, J.F. (2010) A global analysis of the effectiveness of marine protected areas in preventing coral loss. PLoS ONE 5: e9278.
Thomas, C.D. & Gillingham, P.K. (2015) The performance of protected areas for biodiversity under climate change. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 115: 718730.
Tucker, C.J., Grant, D.M. & Dykstra, J.D. (2004) NASA's global orthorectified Landsat data set. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 70: 313322.
USGS (2006) Shuttle Radar Topography Mission, 3 Arc Second, Version 2.0, February 2000. University of Maryland, MD: Global Land Cover Facility [www document]. URL
Wendland, K.J., Baumann, M., Lewis, D.J., Sieber, A. & Radeloff, V.C. (2015) Protected area effectiveness in European Russia: a postmatching panel data analysis. Land Economics 91: 149168.
Western, D., Russell, S. & Cuthill, I. (2009) The status of wildlife in protected areas compared to non-protected areas of Kenya. PLoS ONE 4: e6140.
Woodley, S., Bertzky, B., Crawhall, N., Dudley, N., Londoño, J.M., MacKinnon, K., Redford, K. & Sandwith, T. (2012) Meeting Aichi Target 11: what does success look like for protected area systems? Parks 18: 2336.



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed